No need, this thread is about both in cases where the person is both, as with the man in the op. Same as in the other thread where the homosexual tried to buy sex with a boy.
There is a bigger connection than anybody wants to admit or look at:
1)
33% of child sex predation are committed by less than 1% of a population: Gay men.
2)
Another article siting that homosexuals still promote intergenerational relations favorably and still associate with NAMBLA without official ties because any that do so lose tax exempt status! And it say the figures of exponential abuse from homosexuals is "staggeringly" disproportionate.
-Lest anybody think we see all homosexuals an bin as bigots, that is not the case. We are giving accurate statistics. There is NO arguing accurate numbers :nono;
3)
As of 2014, no change in statistics and 'probably worse' than we'd suspect. Media, liberals, and dupes all shove fingers in ears and yell
"shame shame shame," And everybody are supporting Hitlers calling for Christian death-camps for saying God cannot be mocked and that we reap what we sow...
4) In order to minimize
repeated and stable damning numbers, paid-off psychology firms by these 'non-taxed' homosexual organizations, they have said a) "pay no attention to the staggering statistics behind the curtain" and b) "no child is inherently harmed by sexual predation"
lain:
-Again, not all gays. What is the purpose of a thread like this: to show that it is 1) an HUGELY disproportionate criminal act among homosexuals, and more common place than is acquiesced. No, we are not "just trying to be mean to those poor souls" to report what is shown to be the case. and 2) to keep 'politics' out of an issue that is nothing of the case. We can't 'vote' that its in the genes or 'they were born like this.' The overwhelming statistics are that many male homosexuals today were
molested themselves at an early age.
Bigotry? No! It saddens me. Why won't anyone look at figures instead of trying to explain them away? Why is it these articles are shoved under a carpet instead of raising genuine concern? Because a few gays themselves are marching down streets and defiantly yelling "I was born this way!?"
1) God has said He made sex for one purpose: to make one flesh that reveals the character of God in reflection. ANY deviance from that is a warping of God's intention. No Christian can or should allow for abhorrence away from God's intention. We should be teaching celibacy and love of one another as Spiritual beings belonging to God.
2) We should truly love one another. It is hard for a society so bent on beauty, glamour, fitness, and all things physical, to understand that we are NOT flesh beings primarily, but have fleshly 'tents' as Spiritual beings. Therefore, what all people need from me is not my admiration of their tents, but encouragement of their souls. It does NO good to advocate, as Christians, after the flesh. Scripture says there is "no longer Jew or gentile, male or female, slave or free...but we are all one in Christ." What does it mean? It means, for Christians, that we aren't regarding one another as sex objects AND that we don't make provision for that in our churches. In our churches, we only have married families or celibates. These are our only two biblical models.
3) Civically, we have to be active in promoting the 'common' good of Americans. Anytime promoting a 'supposed' good of a minority endangers the common good of everybody, we have to stand up as citizens and do all we can, as citizens, to promote again what is actually the common good. Yes, at times it will disfavor some, but seeking the common good is a matter of what is best for society.
We know there is a disproportionate problem with giving access without restraint. We are seeing that with bathroom laws currently as well. It does NO good to help a very small minority if it places the greater majority at significant risk (different issue, but same overall concern).