Originally posted by Sozo
Aimiel... YOU ARE A FOOL!
The only prerequisite to your infantile tirade is to merely disagree with your closed-minded dim view of a single portion of scriptures, which doesn't ever closely trespass upon Truth.
Excuse me? Where do you see me telling ONE SINGLE LIE? Also, please keep your voice down, the baby's sleeping.
God and I both disagree with you, as do many of my friends.
YOU ARE A DELUDED SELF-PROMOTER!
No, I'm not, I'm Republican.
The "apostles" hold them in high regard. They are not apostles!
You're disagreeing with the obvious language implications, and with the majority of Biblical scholars.
You have the bible knowledge of a slug.
Coming from you, I consider this antoher compliment.
_________________________________
The following is from:
http://www.godswordtowomen.org/junia-preato.htm
"Junia was a female apostle. This is the preferred view. The evidence is authoritative, compelling, diverse, and objective. Junia has been demonstrated to be a woman based on the testimony of early manuscripts, recorded statements of various church leaders through the 12th century, and research performed by many other scholars attesting to the name Junia or Julia existing in ancient times.
The evidence for a male reading was based on later manuscripts subject to the interpretations of scribes who thought Iounian was a male and to the statement by one early church leader who was also mistaken as to the correct gender of Prisca. Computer generated searches could find no example of a male Junias in ancient times nor is there any evidence proving that Junias was ever a contracted form of a longer name.
Junia and Andronicus were apostles. Numerous contemporary and past scholarship, lexical definitions, grammatical construction, and scriptural examples all provide the strongest support that episemoi en tois apostolois, naturally meant they were "outstanding among the apostles," just as Chrysostom so elegantly declared."
"Andronicus and Junias were outstanding among the apostles probably by virtue of their apostolic sufferings, the numbers of years they had been in Christ, their labor, and their humble service for Christ. May the eyes of all those in the Church be opened to see this important truth and its significant implication in allowing women to minister equally as they are called by God. To do otherwise is to deny the full redemptive work of Christ."
________________________________________________
I guess Sozo thinks women should be silent in church, or maybe stay home, shoeless, and produce babies.