Right Divider
Body part
It means nothing different, 'for', 'to'.
I can see that words have no meaning to you.
It means nothing different, 'for', 'to'.
I can see that words have no meaning to you.
So is what Jesus said to the Jews for us and not to us, or to us and not for us? LOL
You so remind me of jokes about dumbness.
And you get so bent out of shape when someone "abuses" you.
Can you really NOT tell the difference between the things that Jesus said specifically to Israel and generally applicable topics? Really?
You've make such a mess out of scripture by TRYING to FORCE your story upon it. You cannot even tell truth from fairy tale.
Here is what you say: "God the Father came as a son".
Here is what scripture says:1Jn 4:9-10 KJV In this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him. (10) Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.
Those are clearly contradictory .... you are WRONG and scripture is RIGHT!
You don't tell the truth.
I just told the truth and you ignored every word.
READ THIS AGAIN and RESPOND.
Here is what you say: "God the Father came as a son".
Here is what scripture says:1Jn 4:9-10 KJV In this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him. (10) Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.
Those are two very different things. Your's is WRONG and the Bible is RIGHT.
NONE of the scripture that you "quoted" proves this silly idea of yours.I've explained it to you many times.
God the Father is an invisible Spirit and lives in unapproachable light, and no one has seen Him, except the son.
Before God the Father made anything, He made Himself a body, and this body is the body of Jesus Christ, and Jesus, the Son, in the body, was next to God the Father, who still existed eternally in the light.
The Father than spoke through this body, and He made everything that was ever made through this body.
When God the Father was coming to the earth as a man, He was giving up the body and life He had in heaven for an earthly body, a body of flesh.
After living as a man on earth, he died, raised up again, and then ascended to heaven and received the same body he had before coming to earth in the first place.
NONE of the scripture that you "quoted" proves this silly idea of yours.
Pure cultic baloney.
AGAIN, Jesus spoke about being WITH HIS FATHER BEFORE ALL CREATION. John 17:5.
The first "body" that God created was animals. The first human body was that of Adam.
No, I'm not. That would be YOU!You are merely denying the truth.
:juggle:God made the First and the Last first.
You always TRY to TWIST the words of other into something completely stupid. It is YOU making up stupid stuff.You say He made animals first before He made the earth, before He made the angels?
I fully understand that the truth sounds dumb to you.See how dumb your argument sounds?
NO, IT DOES NOT.The Bible says God made everything through the body Christ.
Wrong again... you are always wrong.By the way, you are goofy not putting my scriptures that I gave to support what I said.
No, I'm not. That would be YOU!
:juggle:
WRONG CONTEXT... you understand NOTHING.
You always TRY to TWIST the words of other into something completely stupid. It is YOU making up stupid stuff.
Here is the ORDER of CREATION.I fully understand that the truth sounds dumb to you.
- Heaven and earth.
- Plant life
- Animal life
- Human life.
NO, IT DOES NOT.
Wrong again... you are always wrong.
Quit spamming.No, I'm not. That would be YOU!
:juggle:
WRONG CONTEXT... you understand NOTHING.
You always TRY to TWIST the words of other into something completely stupid. It is YOU making up stupid stuff.
Here is the ORDER of CREATION.
I fully understand that the truth sounds dumb to you.
NO, IT DOES NOT.
Wrong again... you are always wrong.
Quit spamming.
The only one spamming here is you.Exactly. Why don't you stop spamming?!
The same 'liar' and 'cult' comments, and the same dumb juggling emoji.
Your fairy tale is not supported by scripture.Try replying to the scriptures I give and give your false understanding of them.
The only one spamming here is you.
Your fairy tale is not supported by scripture.
- You have lied constantly.
- Your idea are cultic.
- Your confusion is well symbolized by the juggling emoji.
I give you an accurate description of the scripture and you hate it.
I did write David's Lord.
I was objecting to your introduction of the phrase "YHWH the Son", a phrase or title that is not found in the Scriptures and especially cannot be deducted from Psalm 110:1.
Matthew 22:41–46 (KJV): 41 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, 42 Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David. 43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, 44 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? 45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son? 46 And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions.Where in the Scriptures did you find your phrase, "David's Lord"? That's right: nowhere. It's not in there. Neither can it be deducted from Psalm 110:1, nor from anything else in the Bible,
Stop spamming.
The only one spamming here is you.
They are one... you got that part correct.The Lord said to my Lord.
They are one and the same.
There is not any support for that in the Bible. The Bible says that God SENT HIS SON... not "sent the Father as a son".Jesus is God the Father come as a son of man.
Gal 4:4 KJV But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law,
They are one... you got that part correct.
The Bible speaks of THEM distinctly. Deal with it. Agree with the Bible instead of your fairy tale.
Hebrews 5:5 So also Christ glorified not himself to be made an high priest; but he that said unto him, Thou art my Son, to day have I begotten thee.There is not any support for that in the Bible. The Bible says that God SENT HIS SON... not "sent the Father as a son".
[/COLOR][/INDENT]
Continue to disagree with the Bible if you like. I'm going with the Bible, God's Word is God's Truth.