Acts 2:34

God's Truth

New member
I did not say that. You lie once again. Does God like habitual lying?

Some of what Jesus said was universally applicable and some was not. Problem is, you cannot tell the difference.

You sure are twisty. Okay then, was what Jesus said for us but not to us; or to us but not for us?
lol!
 

oatmeal

Well-known member
How many times do I have to explain it until you value the written words that I say to you? Don't you value language? I explained to you that when God the Father sent himself in the form of man, he called that man His Son. What else should God call the man Jesus whom He came as? Humans call what comes from them their son, or daughter.

To be honest, you yourself have taught me not to value your words, for your words clearly contradict God's words

Should you ever start stating God's words, then you will begin to gain some credibility with me.
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
Except it does not say “YHWH the Son”, but David’s Lord.

It doesn't say "David's Lord", either, you liar.

I did not say that it says "YHWH the Son"; I said that, in the verse, we have YHWH the Father saying something to YHWH the Son.

Oh, also, notice that you for some reason chose to not point out that it also does not say "YHWH the Father", nor "God the Father". Why did you not also complain about the phrase I used--"YHWH the Father"--ya hypocrite?
 

God's Truth

New member
To be honest, you yourself have taught me not to value your words, for your words clearly contradict God's words

Should you ever start stating God's words, then you will begin to gain some credibility with me.

You are lost and I couldn't care any less about having credibility with you. You don't even know Jesus is the Christ. You said Jesus isn't living in you.
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
adsqo4q34b n05b 43b0q0vrjaoier apr

Well, I wouldn't go quite that far. However, I do agree with you that adsqo4q34b n05b 43b0q0vr, so perhaps you're on the right track. I'm curious, though: Strrrerwhklickickicku7uut thrithrith? Yes or No?
 

TrevorL

Well-known member
Greetings again 7djengo7,
It doesn't say "David's Lord", either, you liar.
The quality of your posts seem to be deteriorating and you then also resort to abuse. Psalm 110 is a Psalm of David and he calls Jesus “my Lord” in other words as I stated Jesus, the Son of God is in truth David’s Lord, no lie.
Psalm 110 (KJV): A Psalm of David
1 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.
Matthew 22:41–45 (KJV): 41 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, 42 Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David. 43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, 44 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? 45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?


Kind regards
Trevor
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
Greetings again 7djengo7, The quality of your posts seem to be deteriorating and you then also resort to abuse. Psalm 110 is a Psalm of David and he calls Jesus “my Lord” in other words as I stated Jesus, the Son of God is in truth David’s Lord, no lie.

Here, you're playing stupid. You're continuing in your lie. Here is what you wrote:

Except it does not say “YHWH the Son”, but David’s Lord.


Obviously, in Psalm 110:1, David is talking about David's Lord. But that's not what you're saying, here. You're saying that Psalm 110:1 says the phrase, "David's Lord". Because of your Satanic guile, you chose to not put quotes around the phrase, "David's Lord", as you put quotes around the phrase, "YHWH the Son".

Notice the difference:
  1. Except it does not say "YHWH the Son", but [it says] David's Lord.
  2. Except it does not say "YHWH the Son", but [it says] "David's Lord".
David's Lord is not something that can be said, whereas the phrase, "David's Lord", is something that can be said. So, whereas David, in Psalm 110:1, speaks about his Lord--about David's Lord--he, therein, neither says David's Lord, nor the phrase, "David's Lord".

You can say the phrase, "Mt Rushmore", but you can't say Mt Everest; Mt Everest is not something you can say, but it is something that can be climbed.
You can say the phrase, "potato salad", but you can't say potato salad; potato salad is not something you can say, but it is something that can be eaten.
You can say the phrase, "David's Lord", but you can't say David's Lord. David's Lord is not something you can say, but is someone Who can raise people from the dead.

You're not as stupid as you're trying to let on like. Rather, you're a liar. By stating the truth, that you are a liar, I'm not resorting to abuse; it's not abuse to state the truth; in saying that you are a liar, I'm resorting to stating the truth about you.
 

TrevorL

Well-known member
Greetings again 7dengo7,
Obviously, in Psalm 110:1, David is talking about David's Lord. But that's not what you're saying, here. You're saying that Psalm 110:1 says the phrase, "David's Lord". Because of your Satanic guile, you chose to not put quotes around the phrase, "David's Lord", as you put quotes around the phrase, "YHWH the Son".
The reason why I wrote David's Lord and not "David's Lord" is because it actually says "my Lord", but as this is David speaking or writing it is David's Lord. Yes, obvious, but you like to play with words and not communicate correctly.

Kind regards
Trevor
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
Greetings again 7dengo7,The reason why I wrote David's Lord and not "David's Lord" is because it actually says "my Lord",

You did not write David's Lord. David's Lord is not something you can write. The phrase, "David's Lord", is something you can write. You wrote the phrase, "David's Lord", and erroneously chose to not put the phrase in quotes.

David, in Psalm 110:1, wrote the phrase, "my Lord". David neither wrote David's Lord, nor the phrase, "David's Lord".

You're a Satanic liar. I will pray for you.
 

TrevorL

Well-known member
Greetings again 7dengo7,
You did not write David's Lord. David's Lord is not something you can write. The phrase, "David's Lord", is something you can write. You wrote the phrase, "David's Lord", and erroneously chose to not put the phrase in quotes.
David, in Psalm 110:1, wrote the phrase, "my Lord". David neither wrote David's Lord, nor the phrase, "David's Lord".
You're a Satanic liar. I will pray for you.
I did write David's Lord. Would you have been happier if I had said David's "Lord". I was objecting to your introduction of the phrase "YHWH the Son", a phrase or title that is not found in the Scriptures and especially cannot be deducted from Psalm 110:1..

Kind regards
Trevor
 

oatmeal

Well-known member
Well, I wouldn't go quite that far. However, I do agree with you that adsqo4q34b n05b 43b0q0vr, so perhaps you're on the right track. I'm curious, though: Strrrerwhklickickicku7uut thrithrith? Yes or No?

Thanks for the question.

​​It seems to get to the heart of the matter.

in reply, my best answer is dghkyte$&+868)-22srgb.
 
Top