Right Divider
Body part
Can you talk about Jesus instead of where you take these threads?
If you want to talk about the real Jesus instead of your fairy tale one... sure.
Can you talk about Jesus instead of where you take these threads?
If you want to talk about the real Jesus instead of your fairy tale one... sure.
You say what Jesus says when he walked the earth wasn't to us!
I did not say that. You lie once again. Does God like habitual lying?
Some of what Jesus said was universally applicable and some was not. Problem is, you cannot tell the difference.
You sure are twisty. Okay then, was what Jesus said for us but not to us; or to us but not for us?
lol!
Besides your lying ways, you are also childish and immature.
How many times do I have to explain it until you value the written words that I say to you? Don't you value language? I explained to you that when God the Father sent himself in the form of man, he called that man His Son. What else should God call the man Jesus whom He came as? Humans call what comes from them their son, or daughter.
Come on you know you get it mixed up yourself. HA! You say it one way and then when I say what you say you change it the other way. Either way, it is wrong.
Except it does not say “YHWH the Son”, but David’s Lord.
To be honest, you yourself have taught me not to value your words, for your words clearly contradict God's words
Should you ever start stating God's words, then you will begin to gain some credibility with me.
You're lying again... what a surprise.
adsqo4q34b n05b 43b0q0vrjaoier apr
The quality of your posts seem to be deteriorating and you then also resort to abuse. Psalm 110 is a Psalm of David and he calls Jesus “my Lord” in other words as I stated Jesus, the Son of God is in truth David’s Lord, no lie.It doesn't say "David's Lord", either, you liar.
Come on you know you get it mixed up yourself. HA! You say it one way and then when I say what you say you change it the other way. Either way, it is wrong.
You're lying again... what a surprise.... NOT!
Greetings again 7djengo7, The quality of your posts seem to be deteriorating and you then also resort to abuse. Psalm 110 is a Psalm of David and he calls Jesus “my Lord” in other words as I stated Jesus, the Son of God is in truth David’s Lord, no lie.
Except it does not say “YHWH the Son”, but David’s Lord.
The reason why I wrote David's Lord and not "David's Lord" is because it actually says "my Lord", but as this is David speaking or writing it is David's Lord. Yes, obvious, but you like to play with words and not communicate correctly.Obviously, in Psalm 110:1, David is talking about David's Lord. But that's not what you're saying, here. You're saying that Psalm 110:1 says the phrase, "David's Lord". Because of your Satanic guile, you chose to not put quotes around the phrase, "David's Lord", as you put quotes around the phrase, "YHWH the Son".
Greetings again 7dengo7,The reason why I wrote David's Lord and not "David's Lord" is because it actually says "my Lord",
I did write David's Lord. Would you have been happier if I had said David's "Lord". I was objecting to your introduction of the phrase "YHWH the Son", a phrase or title that is not found in the Scriptures and especially cannot be deducted from Psalm 110:1..You did not write David's Lord. David's Lord is not something you can write. The phrase, "David's Lord", is something you can write. You wrote the phrase, "David's Lord", and erroneously chose to not put the phrase in quotes.
David, in Psalm 110:1, wrote the phrase, "my Lord". David neither wrote David's Lord, nor the phrase, "David's Lord".
You're a Satanic liar. I will pray for you.
Well, I wouldn't go quite that far. However, I do agree with you that adsqo4q34b n05b 43b0q0vr, so perhaps you're on the right track. I'm curious, though: Strrrerwhklickickicku7uut thrithrith? Yes or No?