exminister
Well-known member
That's a good start.
Active shooter near San Bernardino, CA
- Thread starter serpentdove
- Start date
That's a good start.
Terrorism is generally considered to be violence aimed at a political purpose. And as hard as it is to believe, the indication seems to be that this event was spurred by some sort of interpersonal conflict at a San Bernadino employees' luncheon that, because this is America, ended with a mass shooting. That's not really political.
Obviously, the result of 'Climate Change'.
nikolai_42
Well-known member
I've been wondering when we would start to see the effect of all the convicted violent offenders that have been released because of shortages of facilities (and money...I guess):
Corrections Officials...Release More Violent Offenders
6,000 Violent and Non-Violent Prisoners to be Released
Violent Offenders can be Released in Realignment Program
And then there's last year's 36,000 illegal criminals that were released :
36K Criminals Freed While Awaiting Deportation
Of course....with the "sanctuary city killing" earlier this year, this isn't anything new....
We don't need radical Muslims to bring terror. And for the government to release these people on one hand and then say something needs to be done about guns on the other....
Please dont include me in your use of "we" I have 0 obligation to take responsibility for something i did not do or cause or contribute to in any way.
I will not ever suffer from manufactured guilt for things i had no part in.
:shocked:
Derf
Well-known member
Sounds like a good reason to ban Planned Parenthood facilities.
:thumb:
It sounds like this was a Christmas party at work, just imagine that.
It doesn't work that way. Al Qaeda, for example, are not defined as terrorists by the government.
You can't just label everything 'terrorist', and for good reason, because otherwise you cannot know thy enemy. It would all just be dumbed down to 'terrorism'.
It's all already kind of ridiculous that everyone is heralding some 'war on terror'- you can't have a war on something abstract. It's propaganda.
Do you agree with Knight's blaming President Obama? Or do you think he was involved here somehow?
brewmama
New member
Except that he's a Muslim, and there were 3 shooters. There seems to be a bit more involved.
I highlighted the phrases that make no sense - please expound
Syed Farook
Disgruntled employee ? Or wannabe terrorist ? Or both.
Too many Muslims in America
And the last guy was Christian. So?
That's where it looks like terrorism.
Yes. There seems to be a pretty clear personal, professional, element. And yet, having three people, heavily armed, seemingly quite prepared suggests something larger and more coordinated. Maybe it's some sort of weird hybrid. I think it's time to withhold judgement for the time being.