heir
TOL Subscriber
She denies that the faith and finished work of Christ 2000 years before any of us no good, double dog Gentiles were even born is enough to save ALL! She has NO good news!~
ECT A further MAD error 2
- Thread starter Lazy afternoon
- Start date
She denies that the faith and finished work of Christ 2000 years before any of us no good, double dog Gentiles were even born is enough to save ALL! She has NO good news!~
My belief is, there are very few, "true" members of the Body of Christ
on this forum!
on this forum!
Doom
New member
One thing is certain, you cannot believe in a limited atonement and also claim that you believe the gospel.
There are a few "Calvinists" on TOL, that I have a civil relationship
with! The others always appear, angry, argumentative, superior,
and somewhat boorish! Nang is one of the worst posters on this
forum, Calvinist or not!
A "true Calvinist" believes that God chose whom He would save
before the foundation of the world, and the remainder, not of the
"Elect" will suffer "eternal damnation!" In order to be a Calvinist,
one must change the character and intent of the God of the Bible!
before the foundation of the world, and the remainder, not of the
"Elect" will suffer "eternal damnation!" In order to be a Calvinist,
one must change the character and intent of the God of the Bible!
Good post!
all work and no play makes . . . oh, wait, that's jack, not john w - but seriously it was a loaded question ? he just probably gets tired of doing the verbal waltz. i see where he's coming from sometimes. i wouldn't answer it myself though. trying to define God never works for me -
atrol:
Nang
TOL Subscriber
You seem to not be very bright, for you make no sense or follow through with good Scriptural argument at all. :dunce:
You seem to be overly grouchy and cranky, why is that?
Doom
New member
Liar, and you know you are lying. You're a dog. Go return to the vomit you spew.
Those verses say exactly what I showed you they say. Any honest person in Christ knows it, but you cannot know it, because you have not the Spirit of God in you. All you have is the same demon your church has.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
all work and no play makes . . . oh, wait, that's jack, not john w - but seriously it was a loaded question ? he just probably gets tired of doing the verbal waltz. i see where he's coming from sometimes. i wouldn't answer it myself though. trying to define God never works for me -
Do you believe your Maker is a Covenantal God?
If so, why so?
If not, why not?
This is not a "loaded question" but a strait-forward question about why you believe in God.
Doom
New member
I answer your question about a verse, and then you respond with:
Then you report me by saying this:
You are a hypocritical pig
Then you report me by saying this:
You are a hypocritical pig
Lon
Well-known member
"Exclusively Christian" and so I'm ashamed of things said in this section. We cannot 'hide' Godliness behind purposeful meaningless insult. "If" an insult is warranted, it should be a sad description, reluctantly given, not a joyous rapture of doctrinal delight. One might wonder whom you actually serve. See my sig. I'm working on it this year. A few others might want to do the same.
The only part of my sin I will glory in, is in the cleansing blood of the Cross but my sin too, placed Him there. My joy is rarely without tears of His necessity. He begged His Father to avoid it. I may sin boldly, but not without understanding that great cost. I tend to sin sheepishly when those droplets fall on me and I see them.
The blood of Jesus does indeed cleanse us from all unrighteousness, but never without great cost to Him.
Luke 7:47 Therefore, I tell you, her many sins have been forgiven--as her great love has shown. But whoever has been forgiven little, loves little.
The only part of my sin I will glory in, is in the cleansing blood of the Cross but my sin too, placed Him there. My joy is rarely without tears of His necessity. He begged His Father to avoid it. I may sin boldly, but not without understanding that great cost. I tend to sin sheepishly when those droplets fall on me and I see them.
The blood of Jesus does indeed cleanse us from all unrighteousness, but never without great cost to Him.
Luke 7:47 Therefore, I tell you, her many sins have been forgiven--as her great love has shown. But whoever has been forgiven little, loves little.
Lon
Well-known member
Not sure what you said, Doom (ignore, remember?) "Love much." Paul was killing Christians, not just opposing Christ's gospel. If God can save him, He can save a Calvinist wretch like me, and a MADist wretch like you. For me, that's a very Calvinist notion, that God saved Paul when he was not looking for it, against even his will as it were, to even strike him blind. If I am wrong, I'm happy to be shown wrong and open to correction (though not specifically yours at the moment). This same Paul, wrote the book of Romans that explains God choosing. This does NOT mean I believe God arbitrarily chooses some while not others. I know the negative of Limited Atonement, but that's not what I believe. It is rather a very ugly caricature that I have heaped upon me, often. I am told to gladly take stripes for Him and I do have to look to 1 Peter to wonder if these are my own stripes or His. I'm not sure if you agree that 1 Peter even applies to my Gentile self. A few people on TOL don't bother to ask or correct. Nick has always asked first. I really appreciate him for that. He and other's examples have led me to this year's resolution to attack less, defend more.
In Him,
Lon
In Him,
Lon
Well, if it were possible, and it's not; you would have noticed, he
wasn't speaking to GM?
musterion
Well-known member
Interesting that Nang said in her report to the woodshed,
Calvinists believe the elect (whoever they are) can't lose their salvation; they'll be persevered unto the end by God. They likewise don't believe reprobates even have salvation, so they can't very well lose it.
So how exactly is Nick in risk of "losing his eternal soul" if he doesn't start being nice to Nang? If he's a reprobate, his soul is already unsavably lost. If he's elect, God can't possibly lose hold of him.
A confused lady, she is.
Consider carefully what this reveals about Nang's core beliefs.
Calvinists believe the elect (whoever they are) can't lose their salvation; they'll be persevered unto the end by God. They likewise don't believe reprobates even have salvation, so they can't very well lose it.
So how exactly is Nick in risk of "losing his eternal soul" if he doesn't start being nice to Nang? If he's a reprobate, his soul is already unsavably lost. If he's elect, God can't possibly lose hold of him.
A confused lady, she is.