31 Reasons To Reject The Jab

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
The global backpedaling begins.


Next, which have already begun, three things:

1. "Nobody forced you to get the jab!" Get ready to hear this narrative from all corners of the media.

2. War as a distraction.

3. The Left in tumult of internal power struggles as midterms approach but many Democrats are pissed off (see point 1). It'll get vicious.
You will always pretend that the vaccine was predicted to work as well on variants as they did on the original strain.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
View attachment 2573

The numbers have never been trustworthy.
Logically it works if you use the old definition of a vaccine, which was defined as something that PREVENTS disease.

If you get the disease, then obviously you were unvaccinated, or if you had gotten a shot, it "didn't work"

But we're talking about the current "vaccine" as if it bears any resemblance to what we've always done in terms of preventing disease.
 

marke

Well-known member
You will always pretend that the vaccine was predicted to work as well on variants as they did on the original strain.
Since both the unvaccinated and the vaccinated get covid we should not assume the vaccine is a factor. And since both the vaccinated and unvaccinated don't get covid we should not assume the vaccine is a factor.
 

way 2 go

Well-known member
FJ3x6hdXIAYg9Hk
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned

END OF THREAD. SHUT IT DOWN. DEBATE IS OVER. IT WAS ALL POINTLESS. WE WERE RIGHT. THE MURDEROUS LEFT WAS LYING.

The only thing murderous around here is your dangerous, deadly stupidity. As your guy says around the 8:19 mark, "So the most at risk are people that are unvaccinated with no previous diagnosis. So this shows it has been a good idea in the past to get vaccinated, because you don't want to be exposed to this virus with no cover from vaccine and no cover from previous infection."
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Democrats and republicans could not resolve their differences over slavery so it got bloody in the Civil War. Libertarians and monarchs could not resolve their differences so it got bloody in the Revolutionary War. Will it get bloody if capitalists and communists cannot resolve their issues today in America?
I'd heard of morons before, but you are just beyond moronic. You take stupidity to a whole new level.
 

musterion

Well-known member
Democrats and republicans could not resolve their differences over slavery so it got bloody in the Civil War. Libertarians and monarchs could not resolve their differences so it got bloody in the Revolutionary War. Will it get bloody if capitalists and communists cannot resolve their issues today in America?

It already is.
 
Top