31 Reasons To Reject The Jab
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
Use of the term causal in this study is laughable. This analysis compares a simplistic artificial projection with actual deaths and claims firm broad conclusions. It failed to account for other variables that also directly affect cases and COVID-19 mortality (confounding factors), such as virus variants with increased transmissibility and healthcare capacity during the pandemic.
The scientific evidence shows that COVID-19 vaccination reduces the risk of infection and mortality; analysis of cases and deaths from 145 countries is methodologically flawed
Ecological studies compare aggregate data from whole groups or populations and seek correlations between exposure to a potential risk factor and the frequency of disease. They are relatively quick and inexpensive to do compared to studies such as randomized controlled trials. However, there are...
healthfeedback.org
Seriously? You are about to mention that people massively converted to cults and that could be a confounding variable. First, people didn't massively convert to cults. And secondly, if you are serious that could have been a primary factor of the excess deaths, judging my ability to weigh the variables would be impossible for you.
Yeah, go ahead and excuse murdering old people as an honest mistake. This kind of excusing you do, is that why you trust government health officials?
So I'm guessing you are trolling. Bringing up Q was a mistake that tips your hand to show you don't even believe the clown world talking points you list.
People massively joined cults! That's definitely the direction we should investigate! The principle of parsimony dictates weighing variables is not something you do well.
What are you even going on about? You're saying somehow white supremacy changes math... I was hoping you'd be more like Barbarian and less like the clown Username.
Still, since all evidence points to government leaders and health officials being at fault for the excess deaths, it certainly can't be the easy way.
Other variables like your claimed massive conversion to cults and white supremacy!Use of the term causal in this study is laughable. This analysis compares a simplistic artificial projection with actual deaths and claims firm broad conclusions. It failed to account for other variables that also directly affect cases and COVID-19 mortality (confounding factors), such as virus variants with increased transmissibility and healthcare capacity during the pandemic.
The scientific evidence shows that COVID-19 vaccination reduces the risk of infection and mortality; analysis of cases and deaths from 145 countries is methodologically flawed
Ecological studies compare aggregate data from whole groups or populations and seek correlations between exposure to a potential risk factor and the frequency of disease. They are relatively quick and inexpensive to do compared to studies such as randomized controlled trials. However, there are...
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Bizarre isn't it?
and totally ignores the fact that the demographic with the greatest proportion of vaccine hesitancy is African-Americans
clearly Skeeter is totally plugged into the leftist mainstream Media, trying desperately to continue blaming the mounting deaths under Joe Biden's presidency on Trump
Bizarre is right. He talks like a troll but he acts like and NPC... more information needed!
There has been a trend starting in 1990 and deepening in 2010 of increasing mortality. Of course with covid the trend was escalated by leaps and bounds. Covid is the main reason but there is also some other element at work here.Other variables like your claimed massive conversion to cults and white supremacy!
I am beginning to wonder whether it is better for a segment of the population to be spoon fed meaning by the Church. That is better than Qanon lunacy. Simple people need a simple explanation for human existence in narrative form. Without it, they appear to unravel and grasp at the ridiculous.
Underlying lack of a stable sense of importance in the world leads to obesity and death.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Though, Trump is now onboard with the vaccine. That ship has sailed. Trump was wagging the dog. He pretended to be the leader of mildly retarded white folks, but really they lead him.
way 2 go
Well-known member
the study didn't include the effects of gravity or pollen counts so its flawedUse of the term causal in this study is laughable. This analysis compares a simplistic artificial projection with actual deaths and claims firm broad conclusions. It failed to account for other variables that also directly affect cases and COVID-19 mortality (confounding factors), such as virus variants with increased transmissibility and healthcare capacity during the pandemic.
The scientific evidence shows that COVID-19 vaccination reduces the risk of infection and mortality; analysis of cases and deaths from 145 countries is methodologically flawed
Ecological studies compare aggregate data from whole groups or populations and seek correlations between exposure to a potential risk factor and the frequency of disease. They are relatively quick and inexpensive to do compared to studies such as randomized controlled trials. However, there are...
there are no "authorized" treatments for wuflu
and hospitals have not been over burden anymore than seasonal flu does
so not wrong , just don't like the results .
New big data study of 145 countries show COVID vaccines makes things worse (cases and deaths)
I missed this study. So did the mainstream media for some reason. But this study is yet another independent analysis that is difficult to refute: we have been misled by the CDC, FDA, and NIH.
stevekirsch.substack.com
way 2 go
Well-known member
expose4 replacement ?
Sorry, the model used to compare to actual deaths does not include the effect of variants. This is relevant and essential to the analysis unlike gravity.the study didn't include the effects of gravity or pollen counts so its flawed
You do not seek to comprehend the links that you post, it appears. Rather whether the headline supports your view is the only consideration.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Possibly
The other element is people like you who support government leaders that are OK with people dying in order to achieve their goals. I know you aren't good at putting things together, but government leaders that are OK with people dying in order to achieve their goals is called, in short, murder.
I dunno about that. The church has a lot more people in it that support murderous government leaders the same way you do than not. And the number of people that believe in Q I think is almost none compared to the number of people that go to church.
You figured it out man! Everyone that joined a cult and believed in white supremacy suddenly got fat and died in the last 2 years! The rest of the living await your evidence and thank you for your service.
way 2 go
Well-known member
Alberta just inadvertently confessed to fiddling the COVID vaccination stats.
More than half the newly vaccinated deaths were dumped in the unvaccinated
Alberta just inadvertently confessed to fiddling the COVID vaccination stats.
More than half the newly vaccinated deaths were dumped in the unvaccinated.
metatron.substack.com
way 2 go
Well-known member
.
boriquagato.substack.com
there is a 2 week window of immune suppression post vaccination. it roughly doubled the base rate chance of healthy people getting covid back before even delta. (it’s likely far worse now given omicron and OAS issues) this has been demonstrated in trials.
this gets not only covered up, but willfully misattributed. i wrote THIS on it some time back. it’s pretty simple.
this is the essence of bayes. it’s how you measure and aggregate real relative risk and outcome. but the definition of “vaxxed” as “dose 2 +14 days” which breaks this utterly.
it attributes the risk of running across the field to “staying in the foxhole.”
if you get sick or hospitalized or die in that period, you get called “unvaxxed.” the increased risk you face due to immunosuppression should be associated with vaccination. instead, it gets attributed to lack of vaccination.
this is frightfully dishonest.
it’s also frighteningly effective if you seek to lie about efficacy.
alberta gets caught palming cards on covid vaccine efficacy
and we get real quantification on the size of the definitional datacrime. it shocked even me.
boriquagato.substack.com
there is a 2 week window of immune suppression post vaccination. it roughly doubled the base rate chance of healthy people getting covid back before even delta. (it’s likely far worse now given omicron and OAS issues) this has been demonstrated in trials.
this gets not only covered up, but willfully misattributed. i wrote THIS on it some time back. it’s pretty simple.
this is the essence of bayes. it’s how you measure and aggregate real relative risk and outcome. but the definition of “vaxxed” as “dose 2 +14 days” which breaks this utterly.
it attributes the risk of running across the field to “staying in the foxhole.”
if you get sick or hospitalized or die in that period, you get called “unvaxxed.” the increased risk you face due to immunosuppression should be associated with vaccination. instead, it gets attributed to lack of vaccination.
this is frightfully dishonest.
it’s also frighteningly effective if you seek to lie about efficacy.