31 Reasons To Reject The Jab

Skeeter

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Last edited:
Skeeter

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
musterion said:
As predicted from the very beginning, it will never end for all who submit. The Left never willingly relinquishes power over you. And Skeeter is here to applaud it.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1471994250577518593
Click to expand...
Predicted from the beginning? All I heard was the virus would disappear after the election ad nauseum. If this is just a drummed up reaction over almost nothing, why is it continuing when Biden's approval rating has plummeted down almost as low as Trump had?
 
Last edited:
Skeeter

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
musterion said:
Exactly what Fauci said was the worst thing that could happen, has happened.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1470803018690056196
Click to expand...
Damn you Fauci for being honest and thorough! The reason the development of a vaccine takes years usually is that the vaccine must be similar enough to the virus to create an immune response but not so similar that you get the full blown disease or worse.

The mRNA technology which has been in development for years in regard to a generic corona virus, is theoretically safer because it only reacts to a small DNA sequence unique to Corona rather than being an inert form of the virus. It appears that we will have to tweak mRNA technology over time to better capture the developing strains, more so than other vaccines.
 
Last edited:
Skeeter

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Right Divider said:
Fauci - middle of March 2020: If you don't have symptom, you don't need to be wearing a mask.
Faucl - later: Wear a mask indoors.
Fauci - later yet: Wear two masks.
Fauci - yet again: No need to wear mask outdoors.
Fauci - later: Wear a mask outdoors.

This guys is a quack.
Click to expand...
Fauci and anyone in his position has to make decisions based on a evolving data base AND he has to predict how the public could over-react or under-react to information based on how it is presented. Fauci has made adequate decision in a thankless job.
 
Right Divider

Right Divider

Body part
Skeeter said:
Fauci and anyone in his position has to make decisions based on a evolving data base AND he has to predict how the public could over-react or under-react to information based on how it is presented. Fauci has made adequate decision in a thankless job.
Click to expand...
There is no "evolving data base" of how airborne respiratory viruses spread. That has been well known for a very long time. That is also why we know that masks don't stop them.
 
Last edited:
Skeeter

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Right Divider said:
There is no "evolving data base" of how airborne respiratory viruses spread. That has been well known for a very long time. That is also why we know that mask don't stop them.
Click to expand...
You are being ridiculously simplistic here. Masks help, but because they do not absolutely stop the virus, you reject them completely. This is what Fauci has to deal with: Concrete, all-or-or none thinkers.

Should we tell such people a mask protects others from you more than it protects you from others? Will these cause people to say why bother when they see others who aren't complying? People focused on individual salvation and feeling they are better than others are less likely to behave in accordance with the greater good.

Should we tell people not to use up our supply of N95 masks because they are needed more in medical settings or just tell them masks do not work well enough (to justify casual use and supply shortage)? Many will be self-serving and grab up N95 masks hoping others will not.

These are challenging times and communication is difficult.
 
Last edited:
Skeeter

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
musterion said:
Mods,

Ban the lying, dishonest shill.
Click to expand...
Please, ban me only after making those who paint me dishonest demonstrate the dishonesty specifically and allowing my response. I have been entirely sincere in my posts and represent no one but myself. I have followed forum rules as I understand them. My level of ire has remained below those who have disagreed with me. Thank you.
 
Skeeter

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
musterion said:
How does an exclusive group of ALL fully "vaccinated" and tested people, gathered together with NONE who are "unvaccinated," come down with what they were "vaccinated" against?
Click to expand...
Because a population is vaccinated to starve a virus over time. An individual is vaccinated to reduce the odds of infection, but does not lead to imperviousness.
 
Right Divider

Right Divider

Body part
Skeeter said:
You are being ridiculously simplistic here. Masks help, but because they do not absolutely stop the virus, you reject them completely. This is what Fauci has to deal with: Concrete, all-or-or none thinkers.
Click to expand...
No, I do not "reject them completely". If you want to wear a mask, then wear a mask. Just don't blindly try to force everyone, at all times, in all places to wear them.
 
Skeeter

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Right Divider said:
No, I do not "reject them completely". If you want to wear a mask, then wear a mask. Just don't blindly try to force everyone, at all times, in all places to wear them.
Click to expand...
You seemed to imply masks do nothing to help stop the virus. Do you respect businesses and churches that require masks for entry? People can choose not to enter. Have a family member enter for them or attend remotely, etc.
 
Right Divider

Right Divider

Body part
Skeeter said:
You seemed to imply masks do nothing to help stop the virus.
Click to expand...
I never said "nothing", but I would say very little.
If you look at the data for areas that were heavily masked and areas that were not, you cannot tell the difference in the spread of COVID-19. But, apparently, "follow the science" is rejected in that case.
Skeeter said:
Do you respect businesses and churches that require masks for entry?
Click to expand...
Only if THEY are the ones making the decision and not some bureaucrat.
Skeeter said:
People can choose not to enter. Have a family member enter for them or attend remotely, etc.
Click to expand...
(y)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top