musterion
Well-known member
It's pre-gaslighting. They're getting out in front of it before the Biden admin gets it put on the childhood vax schedule and the deaths start piling up.
The premise [that the vax situation is free market capitalism at work] is false. The vaccines are not being sold to consumers in a competitive open market. Three "picked" companies are selling the vaccines to governments. This is nothing like capitalism. Free market would be for government to stop buying the vaccines and for the consumer to decide if they want to pay their own money to get vaccinated. But when government makes the purchasing decision [let alone mandates that you then submit to it], you aren't talking about capitalism. It is just the opposite.
This might be your dumbest post yet... and that's saying a lot!So the socialists outcapitalize the capitalists?
it's also removing the control groupIt's pre-gaslighting. They're getting out in front of it before the Biden admin gets it put on the childhood vax schedule and the deaths start piling up.
it's also removing the control group
There you go confusing the sheep with facts.Myocarditis, which is basically congestive heart failure, is spreading even as colleges/universities require the most at risk age group take more jabs.
More Bad News on Covid Vaccines And Myocarditis In Men Under 40 – Even As More Colleges Require Booster Shots For Students - LewRockwell
A huge new study has found the risk of serious heart problems called myocarditis in men under 40 soars with each dose of a Covid mRNA vaccine – and is sharply higher than the risk from a coronavirus infection itself. The findings call into sharp question the efforts by American colleges and...www.lewrockwell.com
I know.There you go confusing the sheep with facts.
Don’t be so hard on yourself it is tough business to get a liberal to see the truth.I know.
I just sentenced myself to 50 lashes with a wet noodle.
I am seeing more and more videos of folks dropping dead after taking the vaccine sure makes me want to go out and get the vaccine and every booster they come out with for the next 40 or so years. Not.Three year old Argentinian girl dies of heart attack one day after vaccination.
3 Year Old Girl Dies Of Heart Attack One Day After Taking COVID Vaccine - GreatGameInternational
Another girl dies of heart attack caused by the vaccine that has now been made into a mandate even upon children who are under zero threat of getting severe reactions from the virus. The girl's parents are quite devastated and have taken to the media to express their grief.greatgameindia.com
Considering how much censorship of negative stories of vaccines exists the few that slip through the cracks in the media are just the small leak in the dike. The study done on VAERS back in 2007 - 2010 reported less than 1% of adverse events being reported.I am seeing more and more videos of folks dropping dead after taking the vaccine sure makes me want to go out and get the vaccine and every booster they come out with for the next 40 or so years. Not.
This image doesn't include what Andreas Noack, a leading expert in graphene hydroxide, found in the "vaccines".
"You have to take the vaccine to find out what's in it."
You are blinded by fanboy passion of Trump. Another thread focuses on this so I will not repeat here.You called one of Trump's statements a gaffe. That has not been proven. It is your opinion. You should learn the difference between an opinion and a fact. You think Trump was mistaken to suggest disinfectants can be used internally, but disinfectants are already injected into humans to deal with infections, so I don't see how your opinion agrees with the facts.
Peer review is a good solid process. However, because humans are involved, some imperfect results can occur. Don't throw baby science out with the bath water, dude.The peer-review process is highly subjective, subject to bias, and often one-sided. Articles approved and published after review were then resubmitted in a test of the review process and were rejected by reviewers during the test. Peer review failed the test of accuracy, consistency, and honesty.
I will make it my purpose to try.Without the universal flood, we would have no worldwide fossil record, but secular reviewers reject any evidence or interpretation of data that supports the flood of Noah's day. You cannot prove me wrong about that.
Let me correct your statement and put it in scientifically defensible terms.Peer review is a good solid process.