They why do you continue to do it. I gave you evidence of one of Trump's gaffes you said you were unfamiliar with and doubtful of. You have never changed your view on the issue despite more and more video evidence.
You called one of Trump's statements a gaffe. That has not been proven. It is your opinion. You should learn the difference between an opinion and a fact. You think Trump was mistaken to suggest disinfectants can be used internally, but disinfectants are already injected into humans to deal with infections, so I don't see how your opinion agrees with the facts.
This is hyperbole and a strawman argument. Researchers are not leftests per se. People with education do lean left but not monolithically so. And, even Msnbc shows some diligence in regard to quickly mentioning exceptions to a rule or generalization. They make statements like vaccines are safe, but a few seirous allergic reactions occur, specifically with the J and J version.
The peer-review process is highly subjective, subject to bias, and often one-sided. Articles approved and published after review were then resubmitted in a test of the review process and were rejected by reviewers during the test. Peer review failed the test of accuracy, consistency, and honesty.
They are considered but evaluated to be rare. Unfounded interpretation of "evidence" is appropriately discarded. Present evidence from a quality source that isn't easily dismissed, and I will change my view.
Without the universal flood, we would have no worldwide fossil record, but secular reviewers reject any evidence or interpretation of data that supports the flood of Noah's day. You cannot prove me wrong about that.