31 Reasons To Reject The Jab

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Will seat belts kill you? Not in normal use. Will the Fauci jab kill you? Yes, if you happen to be one of the unlucky 'insignificant' few they know will die from the jab.
Seat belts restrain you or delay a timely exit sometimes when time is of the essence. Do you wear them? -- they do come in handy in a high impact collision.

Deaths after vaccine according to medical examiners have no real causal link.
 
Last edited:

marke

Well-known member
Seat belts restrain you or delay a timely exit sometimes when time is of the essence. Do you wear them? -- they do come in handy in a high impact collision.

Deaths after vaccine according to medical examiners have no real causal link.
There seems to be no logical reason for liberals to continue to refuse the fact that vaccines have been causing deaths in some. Why would liberals lie about that? Maybe for money? To save face? To keep from being ostracized or persecuted by the brainless brutal thugs and their accomplices and supporters who are in power?

There must be a reason, but certainly not a good, logical, or moral one.
 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
There seems to be no logical reason for liberals to continue to refuse the fact that vaccines have been causing deaths in some.
I think you and others might confuse deaths after vaccine from Covid as being deaths caused by vaccine. Adverse effects of the vaccines are not out of proportion or degree with the adverse effects of common medications taken by millions of people - possibly you.
Why would liberals lie about that? Maybe for money? To save face? To keep from being ostracized or persecuted by the brainless brutal thugs and their accomplices and supporters who are in power?
It could be because that it is not a lie, but it doesn't come in the form of the pretend absolute truth that you market in.
 

marke

Well-known member
I think you and others might confuse deaths after vaccine from Covid as being deaths caused by vaccine. Adverse effects of the vaccines are not out of proportion or degree with the adverse effects of common medications taken by millions of people - possibly you.

Don't keep buying the lying leftist narratives built on the rejection of science and factual evidence. The vaccine jabs are killing people whether the wicked want to admit it or not. The evidence can not be hidden even by leftist social and mainstream liars desiring to force everyone into conformity with the lie while hiding the truth.
It could be because that it is not a lie, but it doesn't come in the form of the pretend absolute truth that you market in.

Call the lie true and truth a lie if you like, but that is evil and is causing more covid deaths than Cuomo's rest home patients.
 

glorydaz

Well-known member
There seems to be no logical reason for liberals to continue to refuse the fact that vaccines have been causing deaths in some. Why would liberals lie about that? Maybe for money? To save face? To keep from being ostracized or persecuted by the brainless brutal thugs and their accomplices and supporters who are in power?

There must be a reason, but certainly not a good, logical, or moral one.
They simply cannot admit to themselves that they fell for the lie....from start to finish starting with the election. It'll take some major great awakening before they'll see.
 

way 2 go

Well-known member
There seems to be no logical reason for liberals to continue to refuse the fact that vaccines have been causing deaths in some. Why would liberals lie about that? Maybe for money? To save face? To keep from being ostracized or persecuted by the brainless brutal thugs and their accomplices and supporters who are in power?

There must be a reason, but certainly not a good, logical, or moral one.
Dr. Robert Malone explains to Joe Rogan how Uttar Pradesh has crushed COVID with early treatment.

Joe Biden met with Narendra Modi and a decision was made to not disclose the contents of the treatment. Why?


h**ps://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1477034232161738755?s=20
 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Don't keep buying the lying leftist narratives built on the rejection of science and factual evidence. The vaccine jabs are killing people whether the wicked want to admit it or not. The evidence can not be hidden even by leftist social and mainstream liars desiring to force everyone into conformity with the lie while hiding the truth.
I buy science and realize experts in a field know a bit more than I do. Your evidence is nothing but any questionable shred of an anomaly given undue importance. And, then you ignore the explanation of the discrepancy. Then you assume a ton of bad faith on the part of objective researchers.

Call the lie true and truth a lie if you like, but that is evil and is causing more covid deaths
You flipped the script here, com padre.
 

way 2 go

Well-known member

Joe Rogan Interviews Dr. Robert Malone​

.

 

marke

Well-known member
I buy science and realize experts in a field know a bit more than I do. Your evidence is nothing but any questionable shred of an anomaly given undue importance. And, then you ignore the explanation of the discrepancy. Then you assume a ton of bad faith on the part of objective researchers.


You flipped the script here, com padre.
Ignoring evidence is stupid, dishonest, and dangerous, yet leftists refuse to even consider the possibility that the mounting number of deaths that occur shortly after being vaccinated are even slightly related to the jab. Some victims have even been found by medical experts to have died from conditions suddenly brought on solely by the vaccine.
 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Until another expert in that same field comes along and tells the former expert their data was wrong.
Peer review and establishing a consensus is part of scientific investigation. Nothing to be ashamed of. A far sight better process than prophesies claimed to be absolutely true -- even after they have failed to come to pass.
 

musterion

Well-known member
Note the full headline, they're wasting no time shifting the narrative:

CDC warns against cruise ship travel, 'regardless of vaccination status'


Many cracks are spreading in the injecticide narrative so they're trying to get in front of it. This indicates that they're starting to panic.

Strap yourselves in, it's already shaping up to be an exceptionally stupid year.
 
Last edited:

marke

Well-known member
Peer review and establishing a consensus is part of scientific investigation. Nothing to be ashamed of. A far sight better process than prophesies claimed to be absolutely true -- even after they have failed to come to pass.
There are people who believe God no matter what secularist scientists claim science shows to the contrary, and there are those who believe the narratives the secularist mob of select scientists promotes in spite of scientific evidence to the contrary. Peer review has become a purely secularist outlet for atheistic interpretations of scientific data, not outlets promoting truth in science.
 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Ignoring evidence is stupid, dishonest, and dangerous,
They why do you continue to do it. I gave you evidence of one of Trump's gaffes you said you were unfamiliar with and doubtful of. You have never changed your view on the issue despite more and more video evidence.
yet leftists refuse to even consider
This is hyperbole and a strawman argument. Researchers are not leftests per se. People with education do lean left but not monolithically so. And, even Msnbc shows some diligence in regard to quickly mentioning exceptions to a rule or generalization. They make statements like vaccines are safe, but a few seirous allergic reactions occur, specifically with the J and J version.
refuse to consider possibility that the mounting number of deaths that occur shortly after being vaccinated are even slightly related to the jab. Some victims have even been found by medical experts to have died from conditions suddenly brought on solely by the vaccine.
They are considered but evaluated to be rare. Unfounded interpretation of "evidence" is appropriately discarded. Present evidence from a quality source that isn't easily dismissed, and I will change my view.
 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Many cracks are spreading in the injecticide narrative so they're trying to get in front of it. This indicates that they're starting to panic.

Strap yourselves in, it's already shaping up to be an exceptionally stupid year.
Variants and reduced vaccine effectiveness has always been a concern. It was never hidden. We have been relatively lucky so far. A changing narrative is what would expect with changing conditions and improving understandings. Did you really prefer a leader who made pronouncements based on fears about the stock market and the potential effects on his popularity rather than best practices and best estimates of experts?
 

marke

Well-known member
They why do you continue to do it. I gave you evidence of one of Trump's gaffes you said you were unfamiliar with and doubtful of. You have never changed your view on the issue despite more and more video evidence.
You called one of Trump's statements a gaffe. That has not been proven. It is your opinion. You should learn the difference between an opinion and a fact. You think Trump was mistaken to suggest disinfectants can be used internally, but disinfectants are already injected into humans to deal with infections, so I don't see how your opinion agrees with the facts.
This is hyperbole and a strawman argument. Researchers are not leftests per se. People with education do lean left but not monolithically so. And, even Msnbc shows some diligence in regard to quickly mentioning exceptions to a rule or generalization. They make statements like vaccines are safe, but a few seirous allergic reactions occur, specifically with the J and J version.
The peer-review process is highly subjective, subject to bias, and often one-sided. Articles approved and published after review were then resubmitted in a test of the review process and were rejected by reviewers during the test. Peer review failed the test of accuracy, consistency, and honesty.

They are considered but evaluated to be rare. Unfounded interpretation of "evidence" is appropriately discarded. Present evidence from a quality source that isn't easily dismissed, and I will change my view.
Without the universal flood, we would have no worldwide fossil record, but secular reviewers reject any evidence or interpretation of data that supports the flood of Noah's day. You cannot prove me wrong about that.
 
Top