Search results

You missed an "Eve" pun there... "... EVEr heard of him?" XD

Scripture. God created man from the dust of the ground and breathed life into him. The only man that came from God was the Man, Jesus Christ. EDIT: As for the second half of that phrase, you'll have to define what you mean by "sustained," since as far as I can tell, "sustained" is something...

Is not a term Paul used, but one that only Jesus and Peter used, both of whom were speaking DIRECTLY to the nation of Israel. There is currently no such thing today (nor for the past 1800 years or so) as a "born again believer," despite the fact that the church has misappropriated the term to...

Because Paul says otherwise. And we know that Paul, at the very least, did not contradict himself. No, just addressed to a different audience than the other books in the New Testament. No, let's NOT assume that, because that's called begging the question. It's a logical fallacy for a reason...

Did you choose to write such stupidity, or did God predestine you to do so? Which answer makes more sense in light of 1 Corinthians 14:33?

Locking the thread, as it's dead.

There's a difference between making it easy to understand the Bible, especially for children, and changing the Bible in order to satisfy a particular set of beliefs. Usually, the latter involves butchering the translation between what the Bible says in the Hebrew/Greek and the English. For...

For those in the Body of Christ, He is not our High Priest, no. For those who are under the New Covenant, yes, but no one alive today is under the New Covenant, not even for the past 1800 years. Please do so.

Saying it doesn't make so.

I didn't ask if you agree with the argument. We know you do. What I asked was, can you ask the same question? Can you articulate the same argument that you hold in such high esteem, or are you just someone who parrots that which he finds pleasing to the ear? Then what use are you? Then why...

"He had no answer to @brewmama, who 'cleaned up'. It began post 115 and was over post 217. It wasn't much of a contest either, sad to say.)"

Nope. Read what I said again. The Bible never puts being salvation before faith/belief. NEVER. How are they being chosen? "Through sanctification of the spirit and BELIEF of the truth." The "from the beginning part" is talking about how God determined before He created the universe that...

And that would be, what, exactly? My, a Christian's, view, is the same as an atheist's? Are you sure you're not on something? 1) This is a straw man, in that you are misrepresenting (blatantly) what I believe. 2) This is a false dichotomy, in that it assumes that there are only two positions...

@Idolater Still waiting on a reply to this. And yes, I'm going to keep asking.

The RCC might be, but the Body of Christ is not a priesthood. Which puts the RCC in the wrong. Saying it doesn't make it so, idolater, and no, I'm not using your username. See the video above. Except that it's not doctrine. You, just like most Catholics, are simply missing the point of...

This subject was even addressed by Dr. Leighton Flowers on his show Soteriology 101 in a video a few months ago. Long story short, anyone who believes in transsubstantiation, et al, are, like the people Jesus was talking to in this chapter, completely missing the point of what Christ was...

Did you not bother to read what Anna said in the post you were responding to?

So it has to be a verbatim quote for it to be true?

The Bible never puts being made alive before faith/belief. NEVER. The following verse is no exception: How are they being chosen? "Through sanctification of the spirit and BELIEF of the truth." The "from the beginning part" is talking about how God determined before He created the universe...

A valid reason to reject the Pfizer jab: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/10/21/murdered-infants-at-the-heart-of-vaccine-research-doctors-agree/