Search results

Noam Chomsky: "How can we get food to them? Well, that's actually their problem."

Believing/faith is not a work, in that it doesn't merit one's salvation. Here's what John Piper had to say about this: APRIL 1, 1976 Is Faith Meritorious? Article by John Piper Founder & Teacher, desiringGod.org The question I am trying to answer is this: If faith is the sine qua non of being...

It's not Christian conservatives who are afraid of teaching their children American History. Not sure why you would try to make that connection where there is none, other than to take a cheap shot at Christian conservatives...

Now their parents just need to not let them go back.

The IRS needs to be audited and then shut down for good.

Who cares? I care about what the Bible ACTUALLY says, not what some man I've never heard about says.

Well, @Idolater?

"You can't have a job if you aren't vaccinated, but if you're an illegal immigrant, ¡no problemo!"

Chickened out already? I'll wait a bit longer....

No one has said otherwise. What you said was that Jesus has always existed as a man, which is completely and utterly false, as per scripture. Don't move the goalposts, Marke. This is called moving the goalposts. Don't do that. I recommend you read this: https://kgov.com/bel/20040223...

So you're denying that I'm calling you out on a potential false dichotomy? Except that it's not. Like Catholicism, Protestantism isn't a monolithic group. Please don't lump brothers in Christ in with Atheists. Because you say so? And which view would that be? hmm? No answer to what...

Because you say so?

My medical history and status is none of anyone's business but mine and my doctor's. She seems to have forgotten that.

Because they are. Because you say so? Says the one posturing... False dichotomy. The alternative is that you're delusional and consumed with confirmation bias, and that at best, the foundations of your "orthodoxy/catholicism" are flawed, and thus the rest of it is based on that flawed...

Probably not.

Because you say so? Unless all those verses are meant to be figurative language... in which case, the non-RCC position makes more sense.

Or you could apply your mind and try to understand what it is that we're saying. It's not hard to understand. You're just not trying to understand it. Which is heresy at best, and blasphemy at worst. God was not a man prior to the incarnation. He BECAME a man AT the incarnation. You cannot...

It says God is not a man before God came a man, and it says that God became a man after He became a man. It NEVER says that God is not a man after He became a man, and it never says that God became a man before He became a man. The two statements are BOTH true, but not simultaneously, as you...

Every single one of those people on the train that day who did nothing, or just filmed what was going on, should be arrested, and at the very least, flogged, for not trying to help the poor woman.

That's good, but you may want to check to see what they're teaching the kids (not necessarily yours) these days.