Search results

  1. JudgeRightly

    Take the jab or we will destroy you

    @User Name To add to this: Neither you nor I have any obligation to protect anyone else from a virus that no one has any sort of control over. Being considerate does not mean bowing the knee to tyrants.
  2. JudgeRightly

    Take the jab or we will destroy you

    People, regardless of vaccination, should be paying their own medical bills, rather than relying on the government to pay them. Punishing someone for exercising their rights is wrong, regardless.
  3. JudgeRightly

    Take the jab or we will destroy you

    For not doing something they have every right to choose not to do? No government should foot ANY hospital bills. But this move only further shows the desire to punish those who don't comply with unreasonable demands.
  4. JudgeRightly

    Faith to believe on Christ !

    ... he was speaking about his disciples. Because Jesus, as He said in John 14, is the True God. “If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; and from now on you know Him and have seen Him.”Philip said to Him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is sufficient for us.”Jesus said to...
  5. JudgeRightly

    On the omniscience of God

    No, God does not act like a man. But HE BECAME A MAN, where before he was NOT a man. Can you acknowledge that much, Marke? You're either blatantly ignoring the argument being made, or your just stupid. Neither is good for your mental health. Which, clearly, isn't speaking about God, but...
  6. JudgeRightly

    Take the jab or we will destroy you

    I mean exactly what I said. Who is to be held responsible for harming someone with a vaccine (or any form of medicine, for that matter) that is supposed to protect them? Because currently, the companies producing the covid vaccine, as far as I'm aware, are not liable for damages caused by their...
  7. JudgeRightly

    Take the jab or we will destroy you

    You also didn't answer my question: So no one should be held responsible for damages caused by taking a vaccine, but someone who does NOT take a vaccine they find to be questionable, or tainted morally, should be punished?
  8. JudgeRightly

    Take the jab or we will destroy you

    If we were talking about a highly contagious viral pandemic, then sure, things would be different. But we're not. The covid is not "highly contagious," at least not as highly contagious as more serious, and far more deadly, diseases. No, you don't. No, we don't. No, I would be better off...
  9. JudgeRightly

    Take the jab or we will destroy you

    From the link: "The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is a no-fault alternative to the traditional legal system for resolving vaccine injury petitions." So no one should be held responsible for damages caused by taking a vaccine, but someone who does NOT take a vaccine they find to...
  10. JudgeRightly

    Take the jab or we will destroy you

    Neither you nor I have any obligation to care about what anyone else does regarding their own personal health. To reiterate: My neighbor has the right to choose to be afraid. If he is afraid that I unknowingly carry an illness, he has the right to be afraid of me. He has the right to stay...
  11. JudgeRightly

    Take the jab or we will destroy you

    Haven't taken the jab. Haven't been destroyed yet. What if the opposite happens? Where they take the jab, and it destroys them? Who should be held resposible?
  12. JudgeRightly

    Wokey McWokeface

    Lets put all the homo and pedo perverts in the military on that ship, and then have one or more of our battleships open fire on it and cause it to sink into the ocean.
  13. JudgeRightly

    Our Moral God

    That's nice. Now make a rebuttal. Appeal to the stone is a logical fallacy. Make the argument, or concede that you have none. By the way, simply responding to this post (and any future posts you respond to) is you changing. False. You, in responding to my post, changed from not having...
  14. JudgeRightly

    Our Moral God

    Yes. Showing mercy is, itself, a change, from initially not showing mercy upon someone who deserves punishment, to not punishing them. The fact that God is merciful doesn't change, but God DOES change by showing mercy. To restate the premise here: That God does not change... in his...
  15. JudgeRightly

    On the omniscience of God

    Marke was the one who stated it originally, but I'm starting to wonder if Lon believes it too...
  16. JudgeRightly

    Speed of light

    @Omniskeptical fix your formatting.
  17. JudgeRightly

    On the omniscience of God

    For example? Such as? Which was because you can't differentiate between right and wrong, as you so clearly demonstrated, which is what he was responding to. His statement that you should not be a pastor had nothing to do with open theism, and had everything to do with you not being able to...
  18. JudgeRightly

    On the omniscience of God

    Jesus: I came forth from the Father and have come into the world. Again, I leave the world and go to the Father.” - John 16:28 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John16:28&version=NKJV Lon: "er, no..." Who's right? You'll have to explain how you arrived at that conclusion, because...
  19. JudgeRightly

    Speed of light

    Beam, eye, remove it, hypocrite.
  20. JudgeRightly

    On the omniscience of God

    Do I smell a Battle Royale XV brewing? I volunteer as a referee! Aw.... That's a lot of tea...
Top