Search results

Secular Humanism has no idols, while Christianity has the cross.

That's a bit of a stretch. How do you define religion?

An unintentionally harsh process can be mastered and moderated. Intentional evil calling itself good is a blight that is hard to remove especially if we consider it omnipotent.

hoping's stance is prime evidence that how religion poisons everything.

You do not get basic logic. In my observation your brain has not been capable of logic so far. You very verbosely say very little, and what you do say is often not rationally central the conversation you are engaged in. A miraculous display has an emotional impact on many humans. However...

You believe in the divine right of kings. And, Putin is your king. That is Olde world thinking.

Polystrate fossils are rare overall. Some trees die standing up like in a petrified forest. Some trees live while debris is accumulated around them. That would represent an intrusion into another stratum that would be accounted for. A worldwide flood would create polystrate fossils quite...

The Bible views women as property?

That would mean that He created the emanated light at the same time he made the star.

In your apartment I assume there are some layers from the 1970s. That is readily apparent. I disagree with your central contention and you are fussy because of it. Additionally, an explanation of God's centrifuge comes off quite cartoonish, so you'd rather not spell that out. I don't blame you.

Carlson and doser are some of the worst people because they put their intelligence on hold to support their party line. What a nation does when being invaded does not change the overall form of government. Democracies can enact marshall law or other temporary measures and they are still...

The blandest fantasy I can think of. The layers of garbage in your apartment are likely chronologically lain. Are they not? Explain why you think this method is bogus. Besides the fact you do not like the results. None of which you are willing to describe!

There are a few assumptions where evidence contrary would be readily apparent. You are stuck on a loop. We are talking a bout relative dating so far. What about RELATIVE DATING? Focus. FOCUS! So, humans float higher than dinosaurs? Water orders species in successive variant fashion? Define...

Really? Because you say so? Because they are assumptions? Any assumption invalidates a method? As I told you before and should know as a computer guy, all inferential statistics have assumptions of their own. So, do not just throw up your hands when they exist. Verify that the assumptions can...

The link explains two methods, No. They are valid given two assumptions and an observation. Assumption checks and the observation can be reasonably made. I provide the milk; you provide the fudge.

Rock layers where fossils are found contain volcanic ash that can be dated. Different layers are consistent with different ages. Dinosaurs and humans are not even close. The fossils themselves are not as old as dinosaurs either...

Existing microbes must be kept from gobbling up stuff.

New life is precluded from emerging in an environment where other living creatures will usurp the resources.

Evidence that religious doctrine escalates violence from non-violence, therefore it is evil.

Miller and Urey attempted to re-create the conditions of primordial Earth. In a flask, they combined ammonia, hydrogen, methane, and water vapor plus electrical sparks (Miller 1953). They found that new molecules were formed, and they identified these molecules as eleven standard amino acids...