Search results

People become more left when they study higher level science.

A biologist will tell you there are three kinds of differences typically seen between genders including genital, genetic, and brain differences. Many individuals do not have all three differences! Most with less typical constellation do not consider themselves trans per se. But, the concept...

Blackburn and others were hoping to get either that or a quote to use back against trans supporters. Even Judge Jackson said "a woman is not a male who thinks he is a woman".

In the context of particular statutes the definition of the term can vary. Any question for the judge is best taken in a legal context, not just informal semantics. The Judge had other reasons to answer the question with more caution.

Dumb politically charged questions worthy of some dodging.

Here there is a personal interest of spouse, not just a political one. His wife had an interest that the records not be made public. Justice Thomas did what he could to make that happen.

The juror was biased; that does not mean that the judge was. Thus there is no legitimate reason to recuse. Do you see the difference between a wife's interests and a juror biases? Judges can sit on cases of clients of a former law firm as long as they were not a part of the firm during the...

Does anyone get jailed or poisoned?

Justice Thomas cheapened a fine institution at a time when confidence in our government is already low. If you cannot appreciate the significance of this, it reflects your cognitive insufficiency.

For those who suffer from dichotomous thinking.

Half your brain is clouded.

Doesn't it concern you that qanon and fox are definitely lying to you?

It is certainly not unique to the Nazi's. The Don't say gay Bill is political censorship, for instance. No political party in the US is so pervasive as the Nazi's or Putin currently in their desire to limit speech.

I admit the truth even when its is a tangent sometimes. In the case of Justice Thomas, his vote on that issue was inappropriate. And, no concurrence by other justices makes it glaringly obvious. On any lessor court, he would be reprimanded by the bar without question.

Very tangential evidence at best. And extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence.

Nope. You purposely miss the point. His wife's texts were among the documents he was deciding on. Capeeeeesh? Being the only one to rule the way he did under these circumstances is suspicious, wouldn't you say? Judges are ethically bound to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. What...

Wow - I never thought we would be adding: wife of supreme court justice texts to help riot! We live in weird times.

The Nazis often didn't eat enough vegetables and forgot to brush their teeth. Stop making nonsensical off-center comparisons.

A judge is supposed to be a neutral arbiter of the law. Judges are largely supposed to police themselves. Failure to recuse oneself in a matter where personal interests or the interests of a spouse is at issue will be an ethics violation warranting discipline.

Answered/ supported in less than one minute. Aren't you impressed, marke?