Search results

Evangelicals have no claim to moral superiority when they back Putin.

Nope. Not having it. People who in a brief instance mistakenly defend someone who was involved statutory rape cannot be said to support pedophilia. That's reaching. And, I said this century. Some of those quotes occurred in the last century.

I am trying to get away from metaphorical language or what Divider called language of intelligence. The cellular signaling system has no intentional sender, so I am not using that language even though it is standard. So, no, no one is telling me anything. I am using my own judgment. I am...

Name someone who refuses to condemn child pornography in this century.

Everyone agrees sex trafficing and child pornography must be irradicated. (Some forgive republican congressman if they are MAGA enough). But, not everyone misconstrues age appropriate educational discussions as grooming, or the actions of a few low-level employees as the central goal of the...

LOL. Compare your post with my post. Empirically -- what do you see in regard to substance?

They have passed a peer review process. Even most Christian SCIENTISTS concur. Evidence of a global flood has not passed peer review. No non-Christian scientist believes the Flood holds any water. Only CHRISTIAN "scientists" agree that there is evidence of a global flood. It contradicts...

Some definitions of science require observable and repeatable conditions, but by this it is not meant that the past cannot be studied. Rather testing of the evidence is the focus. The phenomena itself does not need to be repeated before our eyes. Each piece of evidence that converges to form a...

Drop it, boy, drop it. Is the study of electron fields pseudoscience?

The Skeeter Plan will restore Stone to his jail cell.

So, writings of a human are more reliable than evidence from the past ensconced in rock? Speak, boy, speak!

So, the study of how electrons behave isn't science? Fetch, boy.

Nope. Pseudoscience is science done badly or dishonestly, like not using a control group or other control measures, claiming correlation alone to be causation, or using a paper's caveats and limitation sections to draw conclusions unsupported by the study. Several observations can be used to...

There is some giggly juice and urine down in under there.

It is better than your usual.

That is my interpretation. It also refers to the fact that, the decision cannot be appealed to the Supreme Court. Did you write this?

Your insistence on knowing the unknowable is a dodge. Their agreement is critical. Why would they agree unless they are measuring the same thing? But, we do not need to know it to make reliable estimates. I thought you agreed that sometimes in science we tolerate indirect observation. You...

That guy needs extra stimulation.

It means that the determination of whether to impeach or not can be made on issues greater than just the facts of the offense. So, considering the impact on the country and the impact on one's own career is fair game.

Due process is a term of art in law, and has a specific meaning involving notice and opportunity to be heard by a court and to have substantive Constitutional rights abided by. In the context of impeachment the due process is political and the "court" is congress. Trump was given due...