Search results

Republican voter fraud!

Sounds like the words of an active drug user.

I have not seen footprint evidence at all. Fossilized remains are more reliable.

Content from Hunter Biden's laptop was put in another laptop to conceal the source. Russia hacked the data and then a blind repairman found it to hide Russia's role.

I just recognize that many creationists act out of desperation and make no effort to control for their own bias. Let's see the footprint evidence, and see if you have honest discourse about it.

Have any of these people changed their minds? Sherman Nathon Detroit Freak ddevonb Servo Adam Crow Yorzhik ApologeticJedi Turbo Aimiel drbrumley Delmar Sozo Poly Vera Carp Mr. 5020 RightIdea philosophizer Frank Ernest AROTO CRASH Lighthouse Clete Christine Lucky Free-Agent Smith cruxenlightened...

Is answering old threads in the old threads bad?

Amino Acids are found on meteorites. Amino Acid molecules readily link together in a tight bond. RNA is a single strand of amino acids. Areas of the RNA strand has weak attraction that will form weak bonds with anther strand. DNA is two strands wound together with weak bonds. This is the...

As you should well know, by now, an entire phenomenon need not be observable or repeatable to be studied by scientific method. Science often involves looking at puzzle pieces to study the finished puzzle. Predictions about the pieces need to be observable and repeatable in order to make...

Blinded by objectivity.

Not unless there is an indication that a layer has been adulterated.

No human foot prints with dinosaurs, and no grass with dinosaurs.

Point in fact: he usually states that quite haughtily, and has had this acknowledgment since his was an undergraduate.

Darwin never pretended to have infallible absolute truth, and neither does anyone in any field of science today. You should try it.

Darwin's ideas were a bit of an analogy but quite a bit beyond common sense. Analogies and common sense go into creating hypotheses, not conclusions. That is where the video fails. Now, get beyond the history lesson and focus on the modern theory of evolution.

That depends on which translation you use.

Why rename it when the process improves?

Of course, it's not. Example: hypotheses about the content of our genome have been tested. A bottom-up process would show some circuitous route to achieve results. The circuitousness would reflect earlier forms. Investigation has borne these hypotheses out. The human kidney is built...

It should be illegal for children of politicians to imply access or control of the public figure in order to get lucrative positions in foreign countries, but its not. Is there proof that Biden made a different decision based on paying back a favor? What influence does a Vice President have...

That alone is not enough to make a claim about a specific LUCA. Combine it with the fossil record and information on the genome and then we see a convergence that represents highly compelling support. See how this is evidence and contemplating a library is not?