Then you missed the point. A homosexual who remains chaste commits no sin, just as an alcoholic who stays clean commits no sin or a kleptomaniac who does not steal commits no sin. People who check their disordered desires and avoid sin should actually be praised, not condemned. Why don't you get that.No, I must disagree. Some sins do indeed disqualify us from being overseers..........
Then you missed the point. A homosexual who remains chaste commits no sin, just as an alcoholic who stays clean commits no sin or a kleptomaniac who does not steal commits no sin. People who check their disordered desires and avoid sin should actually be praised, not condemned. Why don't you get that.
Can you please show me a canon law that says that, or a catechism section that says that?do you understand why homosexuals cannot be priests?
Then you missed the point. A homosexual who remains chaste commits no sin, just as an alcoholic who stays clean commits no sin or a kleptomaniac who does not steal commits no sin. People who check their disordered desires and avoid sin should actually be praised, not condemned. Why don't you get that.
Can you please show me a canon law that says that, or a catechism section that says that?
Do you not understand that because of original sin, we ALL have disordered desires which tempt us to different sins and which we must keep in check through prayer and living in Christ. The person who suffers from a same-sex attraction disorder is no different than you or me for we all suffer from disordered desires of different kinds. If you prevent a man who suffers from a same-sex attraction disorder from becoming a priest then you must prevent every man who suffers from disordered desires from becoming a priest. In other words: Everybody.
Result: No priests.
So again, please show me a canon law or a catechism section or a Papal statement or any official document that says homosexuals cannot be priests.
2359 Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.
. Catechism of the Catholic Church
Likewise, I see that you cannot show me a canon law or a catechism section or a Papal statement or any official document that says homosexuals cannot be priests.I can see you don't understand why homosexuals cannot be priests..........
Likewise, I see that you cannot show me a canon law or a catechism section or a Papal statement or any official document that says homosexuals cannot be priests
THAT I do understand. Liberals have infected and corrupted the Church. But be that as it may, we cannot cannot be unfair to someone who is actually doing what they are supposed to do, avoiding the sin that they are prone to.well do I have to show you how politically correct the Church is?
THAT I do understand. Liberals have infected and corrupted the Church. But be that as it may, we cannot cannot be unfair to someone who is actually doing what they are supposed to do, avoiding the sin that they are prone to.
EDIT: For the record, I would prefer that homosexuals don't enter the priesthood. But then I think to myself, what if I were barred from the priesthood because I am an alcoholic, which I am, even thouigh I have not drank in years? That would not be fair. So how can I impose the same unfairness on somebody else.
You're wrong. They are both disorders that have disordered desires as a symptom. Neither can be "cured", yet both can be controlled.for you to equate the two
suggests that you do not understand either
You're wrong. They are both disorders that have disordered desires as a symptom. Neither can be "cured", yet both can be controlled.
Homosexual sex is a sin.
Drunkeness is a sin.
Homsexuals can stay chaste and not sin.
Alcoholics can stay sober and not sin.
Both are born that way.
And by the way, how are you going to tell an alcoholic who has remained sober for years that he does not understand alcoholism. You take a little to much upon yourself.
One is NOT born a homosexual or a drunkard! Homosexuality
is a 'lust of the flesh!'
You have medical proof that one is not born a homosexual or an alcoholic? Because there are medical findings that say they are.
Do you think that people can "choose" to be afflicted with disorders?
disorder - noun
: a mental or bodily condition marked primarily by sufficient disorganization of personality, mind, and emotions to seriously impair the normal psychological functioning of the individual—called also mental illness
: an abnormal physical or mental condition : ailment <an intestinal disorder> <a nervous disorder>
Man, you're so blind. It is commiting the ACT itself that is the sin.The Bible calls homosexuality, and drunkenness a sin! We need
not look to the opinions of "professionals" after accepting that!
I have been Evangelical Protestant most of my life, even spending some time living in a fulltime religious community.
The more I researched the origin of the bible and the history of my faith, the more I discovered the Catholic Church.
I am taking steps towards joining the Catholic Church and my question is this....'Why shouldn't I?'
I am not asking because I doubt my journey, I am asking because I haven't come across a good enough reason NOT to join.
Each side, for and against may debate, I look forward to reading each side's responses.
So, why shouldn't I convert to the Catholic Church?
And by the way, how are you going to tell an alcoholic who has remained sober for years that he does not understand alcoholism. You take a little to much upon yourself.