"All dispensationalists are Darby followers."-infallable men follower Tellalie
We are all in denial.
Eewh, Schistosomiasis!
"All dispensationalists are Darby followers."-infallable men follower Tellalie
We are all in denial.
STP: "It's not that complicated."
Rev 20
11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.
12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.
13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
14 And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.
16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, King Of Kings, And Lord Of Lords.
17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God;
18 That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great.
19 And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army.
20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
Does not sound like 70ad to me.
Er, no, you are Exhibit A of a Darby/Breen follower, that thinks "sound" is literal. You are in denial.
The prophecies that he would defend Jerusalem were "conditional", is my guess.
We are all in denial.
14 And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
Does not sound like 70ad to me.
" for, before sun-setting, chariots and troops of soldiers in their armour were seen running about among the clouds, and surrounding of cities." - Josephus
"In the sky appeared a vision of armies in conflict, of glittering armour." - Tacitus
Does to me.
Yes sir, when you try to force that square peg into the round hole of 70ad, you know what you get fella?
That's right, you make a moulage out of the Bible.
Wrong again.
When you try to force the Bible to fit the false teachings of John Nelson Darby, you make way more than a moulage out of the Bible.
Don't you know, Darbyite, that the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ was in the form of a pagan Roman army?
Yes, even while denying (after having been shown) the mood of conditionality in the This Generation passage.
Wrong again. The appearing happened after the tribulation committed by the Roman army.
(Matt 24:30) Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory.
How did the armies, and kings of the earth, make war with him?
Both the Roman Empire and the Jews killed Christ Jesus and the Christians.
(Psalm 2:2 KJV) The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord, and against his anointed, saying,
So his coming in the clouds is after his appearing, but his coming in the clouds is also before his appearing.
Got it.
I don't think you get it.
In fact, I think you are more confused than a chameleon in a bag of skittles. :chuckle:
Go back and read Isaiah 19:1. Did the Lord literally ride a "cloud" into Egypt?