:chuckle:
It's the opposite of what happened in 70ad.
Nope.
You don't understand the kingdom.
What happened to the Christ rejecting Jews in 70AD is separate from the spiritual kingdom.
:chuckle:
It's the opposite of what happened in 70ad.
And in any such conflict, one of two things happens. The contradiction is denied/ignored, or it's carefully examined and resolved. Tet will do the former while claiming it's we disps who have failed to do the latter.
Watch...
Anything that doesn't match was "conditional" or "fulfilled in Christ Jesus".
The MAD wackos on this site are just as disturbed by the predictions as you are.
In this case, dispensationalism can be traced back to Darby as being the champion of this new systematic theology. Just because you were never taught about him doesn't mean you do not follow his systematic theology.
Except for that whole 'not one stone left upon another' thing. That was just His nonliteralistic alleygoreicall figger of speechifying, to be spurtially applicated by those in His Kingdom Now.
Your "logic" suffers from the oft illogic of anyone often opposed to a thing due to where they are looking at it from to begin with.
The fact of the matter is that concluding the soundness of a thing based on how old or how new it is, is a sloppy way to approach a thing.
"This new fangled 'telephone' as you call it, will never work; who wants to speak into a black box" - Western Union turning down Alexander Graham Bell.
"Not interested - we seriously doubt there is a world market for even five of those 'personal computers" IBM turning down Steve Jobs and his Apple Computer.
I could list hundreds of turn downs like that.
THIS IS WHY I haven't any patience for the likes of you and your kind.
God only knows how many new developments have never seen the light of day due to your exact kind of half-baked "wisdom."
You actually post that under the light in your home that was once some new development in progress and was therefore unacceptable?
On a computer? On a smartphone once some fool's illogical pipe dream.
Mark 1:27 And they were all amazed, insomuch that they questioned among themselves, saying, What thing is this? what new doctrine is this? for with authority commandeth he even the unclean spirits, and they do obey him.
John 18:19 The high priest then asked Jesus of his disciples, and of his doctrine.
Acts 5:28 Saying, Did not we straitly command you that ye should not teach in this name? and, behold, ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man's blood upon us.
Acts 17:19 And they took him, and brought him unto Areopagus, saying, May we know what this new doctrine, whereof thou speakest, is?
"You oughta go back tuh drivin a truck, son; you have no future in this business" - a Nashville Music producer turning down a young man named Elvis Aaron Presley.
No "His" servant, keep your illogic.
This may be the DUMBEST POST of the year.
Worse; you have gone from years of posting Joseph as evidence not one stone was left standing, to not only denying it after I proved you wrong, but you now just cite the verse in an attempt to back up your back pedaling.
Oh.Nope.
You don't understand the kingdom.
You only think that is the dumbest post you have posted.
Fact is; all your posts are dumb.
Worse; you have gone from years of posting Joseph as evidence not one stone was left standing, to not only denying it after I proved you wrong, but you now just cite the verse in an attempt to back up your back pedaling.
You are lower than low; you have no integrity.
You only think that is the dumbest post you have posted.
Fact is; all your posts are dumb.
Worse; you have gone from years of posting Joseph as evidence not one stone was left standing, to not only denying it after I proved you wrong, but you now just cite the verse in an attempt to back up your back pedaling.
You are lower than low; you have no integrity.
There you go again with your half-baked cake of a logic taken out of the oven of your reasoning before you have actually checked and double-checked things.
I am Cessasionist in my view of such things.
Meaning, I hold there has been no inspired revelation this side of the "that which is perfect."
That the traditions of men refused to heed the warning of Romans 11:25 is why such things ended up, and remained hidden to so many.
Why you are blind to it, as well.
Yours is the school of "what makes sense to me."
Which you then post on devices of technology once considered beyond the realm of possibility, even by so great a towering giant of a genius like few as Tom Watson; the founder of IBM.
If you actually had any sense, you'd reread my above post and ask 'what's he getting at?'
Instead, you read it, and respond from the same old parroted reasoning of your "mentors" once more.
When you have lost the argument... Smear the poster... Typical troll behavior.
What is the Gospel of our salvation? What must we do to be saved?
Not really. If you hadn't skipped over the first sentence, you might see how that works. I will repeat myself:Everything else is optional, then.
Yep.
Notice how all the Darby followers on this site live in denial.