Why TeT gets so much attention I'll never understand? TeT is nothing but a "Religious provocateur." He's a complete and utter heretic and false believer. Obviously, he doesn't accept the "True Gospel. (Paul's Gospel.)
ECT Why preterism can never be taken seriously by Bible believers
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
"and, of course, meant land, in the Joshua passage, but no more."-Craigie
1.There you go, folks, this mystic/Buddhist can "prove" anything he wants to, with this sleight of hand.
2. Nope. Land, means land, in the Joshua passages, and following verses, and no amount of your daddy, the devil, pushing you to mystify the book, as he did/does, will work, little devil boy.
The Body of Christ will spend eternity with God in Heaven.
That's his best whimper, as usual, when Danoh/others, pick him apart-Darby.
Nang holds on to her Calvinistic false doctrine/gospel (small g) for dear life.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Yes indeed.
Which means Christ's Kingdom is heavenly, without end . . .
Not an earthly kingdom to be destroyed by fire.
Calvinism and Preterism share a common bond, they are both false doctrines. They are equally dangerous to the "True Gospel."
Yes, at the same time. Don't you believe the bible, sweetie? You're in denial.
"Christ Jesus is the Promised Land."-you
Made up. "Land," means "land."
"Those "in Christ" receive faith rest."-Craigie
Agreed. That does not mean "land," does not mean "land."
"There is no literal application, it's 100% spiritual."-Craigie
Nope. It is literal. "Land," means "land."
Craigie asserts, on record, that the passage in Joshua is "spiritual," only.
Josephus was a Christ rejecting Jew.
Christ rejecting Jews have numerous times throughout history believed God was going to send them their Messiah to help them defeat their enemies.
However, Josephus was also a historian, and his eyewitness account of what took place up to 70AD is valuable to those of us who believe the words of Christ Jesus. The writings of Josephus confirm the many prophecies given by Christ Jesus.
There were scoffers in Jerusalem and there were Roman scoffers.
You have to remember, Jude was writing to Christians, not unbelieving Jews.
Since Josephus was an eyewitness, and the ECF's and Russell were not, I would venture to say that Josephus had a much better understanding.
Ok, what is your point?
Bullinger wasn't 100% wrong
Contrary to what you guys think, I have never read any book by Russell.
Bullinger was the grandaddy of Hyper-Disepnsationalism.
Ah....the typical Darby follower.....anyone who doesn't subscribe to the false teachings of John Nelson Darby is blind, stupid, a fool, lost, and of course "their ears were long stopped up".
I believe that when the "New Jerusalem" comes down, it wll be here on the "new" earth, forever.
Made up. No scripture changes the meaning of "land." Only your mysticism, Buddhism, of Preterism, does that, to make that "invention" fly.
Why would God destroy the old earth and create a new Jerusalem to come down, then, turn around and destroy the new Jerusalem and the new earth? Can you back your assumption with Scripture?
:rotfl:
Used to be?????
That dirt in the Middle East is still there!
It has not stopped being the same land.
Deep down, Darby followers know they subscribe to a false teaching.
However, they're too afraid to admit it, because they are too scared of what their fellow Darby followers will think of them.
So, they try real hard to prove me wrong so they don't have to go through with it.
However, Dispensationalism cannot stand the test of scripture.
Nang and myself used to be Dispensationalists. So, we know how you guys have been brainwashed.
Revelation 21:1 "And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea."
And yet, you are a Josephus follower. You are in denial.
"All dispensationalist are Darby followers."-Craigie pie
All Preterists/AD 70-ists are Christ rejectors.
So there, little arms one.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Yes.
This is the promised Kingdom of Jesus Christ, where all the Jewish and Gentile saints, gathered out of all the nations, will dwell in His presence, without end.
Any and all earthly kingdoms will be destroyed by fire. So the new city of Jerusalem (Rev. 21:1-7) cannot abide on this old land, which is going to pass away. It is a spiritual, heavenly city that describes how all the saints will abide in Christ's glory and light, and reign with Him forever.
Who was the beast and who were the kings of the earth with their armies that fought a war against Christ and His armies of heaven in 70 AD.
Rev 19:19 And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army.
Yes, used to be.
And that's all it is is dirt. It's no different than the dirt in Texas or anywhere else (except maybe a little more sandy).
Christ Jesus is the Promised Land. In Him is where you find rest. You won't find rest in dirt.
It's irrelevant in the New Covenant.
Do you make pilgrimages to that dirt? Do the people who live on that dirt have rest?
Doesn't matter.
You are still a follower of him whether you want to admit or not.
This is fun.
When was it first invented that fire from heaven was really just a lightning bolt symbol on a Roman army banner???????