So, you like Numbers?Song of songs - I have not looked at it for so many decades - its probably my least favourite book of the Bible.
So, you like Numbers?Song of songs - I have not looked at it for so many decades - its probably my least favourite book of the Bible.
So, you like Numbers?
I could agree with the concept that “the Lord’s day” here is the future Kingdom, but this would not exclude the prophecies being from the time of John the Apostle unto the day of Jesus’ Apocalypse, that is when he returns from heaven to establish his Kingdom. It is in the same sense that we will understand the details of prophecies after they are fulfilled.Rev 1:10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day,
That is why I see everything John describes as happening on the "Day of the Lord" or "Lord's day". Lord's day refers to when Christ takes up His power as Lord. This is future. For now Christ sits at the right hand of God, just waiting.
History and prophecy go together. The prophecy about Bethlehem in Micah 5:1-2 and the few hints in Micah concerning a humble birth finds its fulfilment in a remarkable way in the events of the birth of Jesus. We would be very poor if we did not have the history of these events concerning the humble birth of Jesus.I personally dislike the historical approach to Revelation because it relies on so many outside sources, historical sources, non biblical sources, to make connections. It is like saying we need knowledge of Hebrew or Greek customs to understand the parable of the foolish virgins. I personally dislike anything which demands an external, secular source to interpret the Bible.
Some things are future, but I consider it very sad if we did not have encouragement and warning if necessary for the last 2000 years.Also, I understand the Book of Revelation perfectly to my satisfaction with every single event being future.
I imagine that there are many fanciful interpretations. Could I suggest that I am not sure that your interpretation or anticipation fits the details of Revelation 17.For instance, the 10 horns of the beast are sometimes interpreted as 10 historical kings like Napoleon etc. I see them as 10 future kings, two of which will fall or be deposed before Mr. 666 sometime in the future.
We need to make our own choices on the basis of our environment, background and reasoning. I choose the continuous historical approach.Thus, being fully satisfied that I can explain all of Revelation by events in the future, or with the help of Daniel and no outside, secular source, I feel no need to change this perspective.
I cannot see that I will ever reverse my present understanding of Daniel. I certainly have a lot more to learn, but what I said about Daniel 8 and the 2300 days has been a thorough-going conviction for a long time. Other explanations of the 2300, especially futuristic seem fanciful to me.The topic on Daniel got me reading it again yesterday. If I am not on a forum, I can go months, years without reading books of the Bible.
Greetings again iouae I differ from what I suspect you are saying in that thread as I believe in the continuous historic view of prophecy based on Daniel 2. Taking two examples, I believe that the 2300 days is symbolic of the 2300 years from BC333-334 to 1967.
Kind regards
Trevor
I appreciate the invitation to comment on Daniel 8 and the 2300 days. It would take too much to explain every aspect, but the following is a start. Yes Jerusalem was militarily retaken in 1967. This was a reversal to some extent of the events of AD70 when Jerusalem and the Temple were destroyed and the people taken into captivity.How was the sanctuary cleansed in 1967?
Dan 8:13 Then I heard one saint speaking, and another saint said unto that certain saint which spake, How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot?
And he said unto me, Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed.
Especially as Gabriel says this is for the end time.
Dan 8:17 So he came near where I stood: and when he came, I was afraid, and fell upon my face: but he said unto me, Understand, O son of man: for at the time of the end shall be the vision.
I presume you are going to point to the 6 day war, and Jerusalem retaken.
I don't consider this to be the sanctuary cleansed. Especially as the Dome of the Rock still sits on the temple mount, and there is no sanctuary.
If it were fulfilled in 1967, I would be disappointed.
Greetings again iouae, I appreciate the invitation to comment on Daniel 8 and the 2300 days. It would take too much to explain every aspect, but the following is a start. Yes Jerusalem was militarily retaken in 1967. This was a reversal to some extent of the events of AD70 when Jerusalem and the Temple were destroyed and the people taken into captivity.
The principal event or vision of Daniel 8 is the overthrow of the Persian Ram by the Grecian Goat. This occurred in BC334-333. The significance of the change was a shift from the Persians who supported the Jews in their return and their worship, to a Gentile power which was at times antagonistic to the Jews and their religion. The Romans, successors to the Greeks, also were at times antagonistic. The expression used is “Trodden down” and this expresses military subjugation, and this is usually followed by political and sometimes religious subjugation. We have yet to see the full outworking of a reversal of political and religious subjugation.
Jesus alludes to Daniel 8:13-14 in the following, setting a correct understanding of Daniel’s prophecy.
Luke 21:20-24 (KJV): 20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. 21 Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto. 22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. 23 But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people. 24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.
The Persians did not tread down Jerusalem, but supported the Temple restoration. Thus the 2300 commences with Alexander the Great. Jesus mentions a longer period than the 2300 years. The times of the Gentiles commenced with the Babylonian captivity, and will not be complete until the King of the North is defeated Ezekiel 38, Daniel 11:40-45. I believe that we are already in the “end times”, and 1967 is one of the steps. It is significant that the world is focussing on Jerusalem, and the events of 1967 were instrumental in creating the situation where now the nations seek to become involved in the status of Jerusalem, especially the Old City where Jesus was crucified. The city belongs to Jesus Matthew 5:35.
Kind regards
Trevor
I appreciate your response. For my part I see a difference between Daniel 7 and 8. Daniel 7 describes more the Western aspect of the Roman Empire and the little horn is the Papacy. The emphasis then is more on the religious aspect. Daniel 8 starts with the conflict between Greece and Persia, but then progresses to the Roman Empire, but this describes more the Eastern aspect of the Roman Empire. The emphasis then in Daniel 8 is more on the military aspect. You may object, but I parallel the latter verses of Daniel 8 with Daniel 11:40-45. I see this initial invasion of the Holy Land as preceding the final revelation of the Man of Sin. He will be revealed after Armageddon, after Jesus has defeated the King of the North. Another reinforcement of my understanding of Daniel 8 is the emphasis of the speed, persistence and success of Alexander's conquest. The aspects of the speed, persistence and success of the start of the 2300, can be compared to the same with the war, the end of the 2300 and the reversal of the events in BC334-333, that is now known as the Six Day War.Trevor, I am looking into what you say, but it will take some time since I am not used to looking at it your way. In the meantime, I believe the 2300 start when the man of sin is revealed, and ends when he is killed.
2Th 2:7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
2Th 2:8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed [START], whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming[END OF 2300]:
2Th 2:9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders.
But I am not even sure what I believe since it has been so long. But I am very inclined to the KISS principle of keeping things simple.
Greetings again iouae, I appreciate your response. For my part I see a difference between Daniel 7 and 8. Daniel 7 describes more the Western aspect of the Roman Empire and the little horn is the Papacy. The emphasis then is more on the religious aspect. Daniel 8 starts with the conflict between Greece and Persia, but then progresses to the Roman Empire, but this describes more the Eastern aspect of the Roman Empire. The emphasis then in Daniel 8 is more on the military aspect. You may object, but I parallel the latter verses of Daniel 8 with Daniel 11:40-45. I see this initial invasion of the Holy Land as preceding the final revelation of the Man of Sin. He will be revealed after Armageddon, after Jesus has defeated the King of the North. Another reinforcement of my understanding of Daniel 8 is the emphasis of the speed, persistence and success of Alexander's conquest. The aspects of the speed, persistence and success of the start of the 2300, can be compared to the same with the war, the end of the 2300 and the reversal of the events in BC334-333, that is now known as the Six Day War.
As far as knowing events beforehand, one prophetic commentator in the late 1800s based upon the 2300 of Daniel 8 stated that the Jews would capture Jerusalem in the spring of 1967. To reveal my age, I also attended a Bible Class in 1965 where the dates BC334-331 were connected to the 2300 to state that great things would soon happen in the Holy Land, and the period 1966-1969 was stated. I still have my pencil notes in my Bible margin. Also one of our pamphlets issued in December 1966 had a pictorial representation, stating that the focus of attention should be on the Holy Land, and not Vietnam, and the writer was drawing attention to the final conflict from Ezekiel 38. The world did shift some of its attention to the Holy Land for a short while. Jerusalem is now in the news again, but most probably it will settle down, as Ezekiel 38 and Daniel 11:40-45 have a few more details yet to develop before it can be fulfilled. We will need to patient, watching and waiting for the Lord’s return as Revelation 16:15 indicates that Jesus will come to his household before the full development of Armageddon.
I connect 2 Thessalonians 2:7-9 with Daniel 7, not Daniel 8. It speaks of the falling away that started in the times of the Apostles, but did not fully develop because of the defense of the Truth by the Apostles and some of their immediate successors. The other restraining force was the Pagan Roman Empire, but once overcome by Constantine, the Man of Sin, the Papacy was fully developed and revealed. After Armageddon Revelation 16:12-16, the Papacy will not repent Revelation 16:21, nor will he submit to Christ, and the Man of Sin, the Pope at that time, will oppose Christ as depicted in Revelation 17:12-14. So at this time I will leave you with your end-time predictions and futurism. My impression is that many with these views will side with the Papacy against Christ.
All of the above is why I do not fear the end times, but my only fear is whether I will be found worthy at that time, because of my many failings. On the other hand I have been greatly encouraged by the gentle hand of my God, the Father and His Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, in my life.
Kind regards
Trevor
I do not accept this as the correct interpretation, as I do not believe that the King of the North is Mr.666. As stated I believe that the King of the North will be mainly a military power, identified in location north of Israel, similar to the Eastern Roman Empire. When defeated I believe that Mr.666 will appear, mainly a religious power and is identified with the Western Roman Empire, similar to the 10 horn locations after the decline of the Roman Empire.Trevor, Try something out if you don't mind. Wherever you see "he" or "him" substitute (Mr.666).
Does this sound reasonable now?
If this is the correct interpretation, what do you learn from this?
I find these comments fanciful, and far outside the way I view these things.I feel you are quite right about the importance of Alexander the Great.
My belief is that the same demon spirit that was in Alexander, will be in Mr. 666.
This spirit, called "the beast" is currently locked away underground. Hence this spirit WAS, IS (locked away), and IS TO COME (out of the pit, with attitude, and recommissioned to do what Alexander did back then).
Greetings again iouae, I do not accept this as the correct interpretation, as I do not believe that the King of the North is Mr.666. As stated I believe that the King of the North will be mainly a military power, identified in location north of Israel, similar to the Eastern Roman Empire. When defeated I believe that Mr.666 will appear, mainly a religious power and is identified with the Western Roman Empire, similar to the 10 horn locations after the decline of the Roman Empire. I find these comments fanciful, and far outside the way I view these things.
Kind regards
Trevor
1. God has commanded "fear not" and also Mat 6:34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.
We are commanded not to worry or fear, just as we are commanded not to kill. We have to look for another, more appropriate response to the end time.
2. We do not know if this is the end time. Everyone saying it is the end time has been wrong, to date. It may be, we shall see.
3. If this is the end time, then what could one actually do about it to improve our situation, instead of sitting talking about it? Most folks who preach the end time take zero, nil, nada steps to improve their or others situations IF this is the end time. It's almost hypocrisy, or just a head belief.
4. IF this is the end time, then depending on whether one is a pre-tribulation, mid-trib, or post-trib rapture or no rapture believer, this should shape one's actions. I am a post-trib rapture believer, believing one will have to live through the first 5 seals, before the rapture comes. IF I really believed with all my heart this was the end time, I should become a doomsday prepper, bug out with a few year supply of stores, and disappear off the grid when Mr. 666 offers me his mark. That would be a faith appropriate response, instead of fear and worry.
5. What is the worst that can happen. AI or Mr. 666 takes over the world and tells me to bow down and worship his image or 666-bot. Then I can refuse, and hope the end comes quickly. Like the early Christians who were martyred, Christ made sure that they were not tempted above what they were able to bear.
6. I dislike prophecy because what can it actually do for your walk with God? Prophecy is there to warn the wicked, and maybe motivate Christ's servants to be about His business. But love and concern motivate perhaps better than hell and brimstone preaching. Folks live their whole lives watching the news for end time prophecy being fulfilled. When the end time really comes, I don't think I will not notice that it has arrived, if it is as bad as prophecy says it will be.
7. There are ministries who's "thing" is Bible prophecy. This is mostly what they talk about. I feel they should preach the Good News of the Gospel, which is Christ's Kingdom, not the Bad News of what happens before His kingdom.
8. For most of us today, the glass IS half full or 99% full. It's just so much more pleasant living like Pollyanna.
9. Christ devoted next to no time speaking about the end times while He was on earth. Did you know that his Matt 24, end-time prophecy was given days before He was crucified. For the rest of the four Gospels, Christ's focus was on folks souls being saved, not their skin being saved.
10. "Cowards die many times before their deaths; The valiant never taste of death but once" - Julius Caesar.
What is the longest you've gone without food?
48 hours. Why?