Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
I'd have to know more about the reasoning behind it before making a comment. I'm speculating that like track marks on a junkie's arms, showing anal trauma would be evidence in court to convict someone of a homosexual act.
Anal trauma from homosexual acts is no laughing matter.
The lining of the vagina is tough, like the skin on our hands, so it can withstand the trauma of intercourse and child bearing, but the lining of the anus is too delicate to withstand any trauma.
Anal intercourse, penile or otherwise, traumatizes the soft tissues of the rectal lining. As a consequence, the lining of the rectum is almost always traumatized to some degree by any act of anal intercourse. Even in the absence of major trauma, minor or microscopic tears in the rectal lining allow for immediate contamination and the entry of germs into the bloodstream."
Furthermore, comparable tears in the vagina are not only less frequent because of the relative toughness of the vaginal lining, but the environment of the vagina is vastly cleaner than that of the rectum. Indeed, we are designed with a nearly impenetrable barrier between the bloodstream and the extraordinarily toxic and infectious contents of the bowel.
Anal intercourse creates a breach in this barrier for the receptive partner, whether or not the insertive partner is wearing a condom."
In addition to the trauma of intercourse, semen can eat away at the intestinal lining. This allows a person to "infect themselves" as the bacteria from their feces enter the blood stream.
As a result of this, a man is 2,700 times more likely to get an HIV infection from anal intercourse than he is from vaginal intercourse. Anal intercourse is so dangerous, the United Kingdom Blood Transfusion Service will not accept blood from any man who has ever had sex with another man, even if they were practicing 'safe sex' with a condom.
Regarding safe sex, even condom manufacturers advise against anal intercourse. The condom company, Durex, said in October 2000 : "Anal intercourse is a high-risk activity because of the potential for infection from STDs including HIV transmission. Currently, there are no specific standards for the manufacture of condoms for anal sex. Current medical advice is therefore to avoid anal sex..
http://earstohear.net/Separation/sodomy.html
Just say NO! to buggery. But then since the anus is to a homosexual act what the vagina is to a heterosexual act...
I'd have to know more about the reasoning behind it before making a comment. I'm speculating that like track marks on a junkie's arms, showing anal trauma would be evidence in court to convict someone of a homosexual act.
Anal trauma from homosexual acts is no laughing matter.
The lining of the vagina is tough, like the skin on our hands, so it can withstand the trauma of intercourse and child bearing, but the lining of the anus is too delicate to withstand any trauma.
Anal intercourse, penile or otherwise, traumatizes the soft tissues of the rectal lining. As a consequence, the lining of the rectum is almost always traumatized to some degree by any act of anal intercourse. Even in the absence of major trauma, minor or microscopic tears in the rectal lining allow for immediate contamination and the entry of germs into the bloodstream."
Furthermore, comparable tears in the vagina are not only less frequent because of the relative toughness of the vaginal lining, but the environment of the vagina is vastly cleaner than that of the rectum. Indeed, we are designed with a nearly impenetrable barrier between the bloodstream and the extraordinarily toxic and infectious contents of the bowel.
Anal intercourse creates a breach in this barrier for the receptive partner, whether or not the insertive partner is wearing a condom."
In addition to the trauma of intercourse, semen can eat away at the intestinal lining. This allows a person to "infect themselves" as the bacteria from their feces enter the blood stream.
As a result of this, a man is 2,700 times more likely to get an HIV infection from anal intercourse than he is from vaginal intercourse. Anal intercourse is so dangerous, the United Kingdom Blood Transfusion Service will not accept blood from any man who has ever had sex with another man, even if they were practicing 'safe sex' with a condom.
Regarding safe sex, even condom manufacturers advise against anal intercourse. The condom company, Durex, said in October 2000 : "Anal intercourse is a high-risk activity because of the potential for infection from STDs including HIV transmission. Currently, there are no specific standards for the manufacture of condoms for anal sex. Current medical advice is therefore to avoid anal sex..
http://earstohear.net/Separation/sodomy.html
Just say NO! to buggery. But then since the anus is to a homosexual act what the vagina is to a heterosexual act...
