Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 5

[aCultureWarrior]

So much for Donald Trump being anti -Muslim.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=108&v=lFKBL_305hc

"...one of the world's great religions..."?

You forgot the word "violent" Donald.

Religion of Peace
Atrocity of the Week

Pastor among 6 Killed
During Attack on Church

Other Recent "Misunderstandings
of Islam"

2019.05.14 (Syria)
Two children are among six killed when terrorists lob missiles into a refugee camp.

2019.05.12 (Somalia)
A Turkish engineer is murdered by al-Shabaab bombers.

2019.05.12 (Syria)
A Sunni group sends a barrage of shells into a Christian neighborhood, killing five children and a woman.

2019.05.12 (Burkina Faso)
A large group of extremists attack a church during a service, killing six, including the pastor.

2019.05.11 (Afghanistan)
Eight children are pulled into pieces by shrapnel from a Taliban landmine.

2019.05.11 (Pakistan)
Three Majeed Brigade gunmen stage a suicide attack on a luxury hotel, killing four civilians and a guard.

https://thereligionofpeace.com/

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Everyone that embraces decency can let out a big sigh of relief, as Donald Trump allegedly doesn't support the 'Equality Act'.


President Donald Trump ‘opposes the Equality Act’

May 14, 2019

President Donald Trump does not support the Equality Act, an unnamed White House official told the Washington Blade.
The report, published on Monday (May 13), suggests even more hurdles along the way for the legislation that would extend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include gender identity and sexual orientation as categories protected from discrimination at the federal level...

The bill, which was introduced in March and is scheduled for a vote on the House floor on Friday (May 17), would ensure LGBT+ people can’t be discriminated against in areas including public accommodations and facilities, education, federal funding, employment, housing, credit, and the jury system...

The senior administration official told the Washington Blade in a statement via email: “The Trump administration absolutely opposes discrimination of any kind and supports the equal treatment of all; however, this bill in its current form is filled with poison pills that threaten to undermine parental and conscience rights.”..


The bill is expected to pass in the House, where Democrats hold a majority, but will face a tougher battle in the Republican-controlled Senate. Should the bill pass both votes, President Trump may still refuse to sign it.

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2019/05/14/president-donald-trump-opposes-equality-act/

Not to worry LGBTQ'ers, plan B is in place if the Equality Act shouldn't make it through Congress and past Donald Trump's desk.

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5333954&viewfull=1#post5333954

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Abortion ban reaction: Democrats erupt, Republicans stay quiet as both sides see an impact in the 2020 election

May 16, 2019

An Alabama bill intended to test whether President Trump’s Supreme Court appointees will allow for the banning of abortion, even in cases of rape and incest, threatened Wednesday to reshape the dynamics of the 2020 election.

Democrats erupted with loud and sustained outrage in an effort to reclaim the upper hand on a politically sensitive issue that has recently found them on the defensive after liberal states proposed extending protections for abortions late in pregnancy.
Republicans leaders, by contrast, spent much of the day avoiding questions about the Alabama law, wary of being dragged into a debate over whether to refuse rape and incest victims the option of abortion following forced pregnancies.

Trump left the topic of the Alabama law unaddressed on Twitter, the White House offered no comment about the measure, and several Republican senators such as Martha McSally (Ariz.) and Thom Tillis (N.C.), who are facing tough reelection fights, avoided the issue as best they could.
“That’s a state issue. I’m focused on my work here,” McSally said in a hallway interview at the U.S. Capitol.
Tillis dodged in a similar encounter: “I’m going to leave it to the folks in Alabama how to govern that state.”

Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...-the-2020-election/ar-AABp5b6?ocid=spartanntp

Note how the political Party that is supposedly pro life is mute on the subject of protecting the unborn in all cases (from what I understand there is an exception if the mother's life is endangered). The Republicrats are obviously wetting the tips of their slimy fingers and holding them up to test the political wind before they comment on this legislation.

Have the boycotts, death threats and domestic terrorism against the State of Alabama and those brave men who voted for the abortion ban started yet? (Emphasis on the word "yet").

Of course court battles will be going on for months over this. Will Trump's two supposed "pro life" picks Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh side with the unborn if this case should make it back to the Supreme Court?

Don't bet on it, as they're both into precedence and precedence says that in cases of human sexuality, "the right to privacy" is the law of the land.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

So much for the Republicrat Party being a pro life political Party.

RNC chair says she personally opposes Alabama abortion law

May 17, 2019

Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna [Romney] McDaniel on Friday said she personally opposes Alabama’s new abortion law, which would outlaw abortions at any point during pregnancy, even in cases of rape and incest.

“Personally, I would have the exceptions,” McDaniel said during an interview on CNN. “That's my personal belief. But we are a party that is a broad tent. If you agree with us 80 percent of the time, I want you to be a Republican. We don’t have a litmus test as to whether you can belong to our party.”

Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...abama-abortion-law/ar-AABvdCu?ocid=spartanntp


Two things: As the chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, Mitt's niece wouldn't be allowed to give her "personal opinion" on the subject unless it was agreed upon by her fellow Republicrats all the way up to the wannabe dictator in chief.

Note how the Republicrat Party is now the "broad tent" (or as Phony Perkins said "big tent") Party that welcomes everyone even if they're pro homosexual and pro abortion.

Donald the degenerate Trump and the chair of the Republican National Committee, Ronna Romney McDaniel (no nepotism here).

 

[aCultureWarrior]

‘I Think it’s Great. … It’s Good’: Trump Says He Has ‘No Problem’ With Buttigieg Campaigning With ‘Husband’

May 17, 2019

In an interview that will be aired nationwide on Fox News this Sunday, President Donald Trump agreed without hesitation and affirmed that “it’s great” that Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttgieg is campaigning for office with his “husband” — a sign that such relationships can now be seen as “normal” and “progress” in the country.
“Putting aside policy disagreements, don’t you think that it’s just great to see the guy there on the stage with his husband, and it’s normal?” Steve Hilton, host of “The Next Revolution,” asked.
“I think it’s absolutely fine. I do,” Trump replied. “I think it’s absolutely fine.”

“Isn’t it a sign of great progress in the country?” Hilton inquired, continuing to prompt the president to concur that the development is positive.

Yeah, I think it’s great,” Trump answered unflinchingly. “I think that’s something that perhaps some people will have a problem with, [but] I have no problem with it whatsoever. I think it’s good.”

Read more: https://christiannews.net/2019/05/1...blem-with-buttigieg-campaigning-with-husband/

Democratic Presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg and his 'husband'. (I wonder if they honeymooned near an HIV/AIDS clinic?)
Republicrat President Donald Trump believes that the faux marriage "is great".

 

[aCultureWarrior]

As expected, the 'Equality Act' easily passed in the House of Representatives, with a few Republicans proudly flying the rainbow flag as they voted "yes".

https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/05/17/with-support-of-8-republicans-house-passes-equality-act/

It's speculated that the Senate won't even allow it to come to a vote, hence Plan B: the SCOTUS decision that will be happening in 2020 deciding whether or not if sexual orientation (i.e. homosexuality and transgenderism) are protected from discrimination under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5333954&viewfull=1#post5333954

Don't think for a moment that the SCOTUS decision will only be applicable to employment discrimination, as once they've decided that sexual orientation is protected under the 1964 Civil Rights Act (and the black robed tyrants will rule in favor of that), the Supreme Court's version of the 'Equality Act' will be the law of the land.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Gotta love Phil Robertson:

Duck Dynasty’s Phil Robertson to ex-transgender Christian: ‘I am your brother’

May 16, 2019

As a growing band of courageous ex-gays and ex-transgenders from around the United States prepare to travel to Washington, D.C. for the second annual Freedom March later this month,
https://www.freedomtomarch.com/

founder Jeffrey McCall thanked Duck Dynasty’s Phil Robertson for encouraging him “to push through persecution.”
McCall had visited Robertson last summer to tell his story on Robertson’s In the Woods with Phil CRTV show.
During the video interview, McCall explained that when he turned away from his old life as “Scarlet” — a trans “woman” — and embraced his new life in Christ, he lost all his friends.

Robertson quickly assured McCall, “I am your brother.”
“Your brothers and sisters love you, they really do, and I do, too,” said Robertson. “You are to be commended for seeing the error of your ways, and turning to to God.”...

“Even when people persecute you, keep going,” said Robertson, encouraging McCall. “What you are doing is ‘Kingdom work.’’’

McCall is the driving force behind the Freedom March, first held in the nation’s capital last May.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/former-trans-woman-i-dumped-my-dresses-hair-makeup-to-follow-jesus

The racially diverse group of mostly Millennials — formerly sexually active gays and lesbians as well as others who had lived as “transgenders (assuming the identity of a member of the opposite sex) — has faced plenty of opposition after publicly proclaiming the freedom its members have found through Jesus Christ.”
Read more: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/d...to-ex-transgender-christian-i-am-your-brother

They were never your friends to begin with Jeffrey, as true friends guide you in the right direction, not a destructive one.

God bless these brave men and women for going public and telling how change from homosexuality and transgenderism is possible.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Having some fun with Libertarian for life Ron Paul:

Libertarian for life turned Republicrat Congressman from Texas (retired) Ron Paul has this article circulating around the internet:

Violence Against Women Act Does Violence to the Constitution
When government violates the rights of anyone it threatens the liberties of everyone


A common trick of big-government loving politicians is to give legislation names so appealing that it seems no reasonable person could oppose it. The truth is, the more unobjectionable the title, the more objectionable the content. Two well-known examples are the “PATRIOT Act” and the “Access to Affordable and Quality Care Act.”
Another great example is the Violence Against Women Act. Passed in 1994, the Violence Against Women Act provides federal grants to, and imposes federal mandates on, state and local governments with the goal of increasing arrests, prosecutions, and convictions of those who commit domestic violence.
Like most federal laws, the Violence Against Women Act is unconstitutional. The Constitution limits federal jurisdiction to three crimes: counterfeiting, treason, and piracy. All other crimes — including domestic violence — are strictly state and local matters.

The law also forbids anyone subject to a restraining order obtained by a spouse or a domestic partner from owning a gun. This is a blatant violation of the Second Amendment’s prohibition on federal laws denying anyone the right to own a gun. Whether someone subject to a restraining order, or convicted of a violent crime, should lose their rights to own firearms is a question to be decided by state and local officials.
Read more: https://www.newswars.com/violence-against-women-act-does-violence-to-the-constitution/

My response:

Interesting article Dr. Paul. Before I comment on it I wanted to share the deep gratitude that the LGBT movement has for you for crossing Party lines and voting to allow openly homosexual men and women in the military. I really doubt that the makers of that document that you claim to be an expert on (The US Constitution) felt the same way, but hey, the times are a changing aren't they?
The drug culture also owes you a lot, as marijuana is being legalized State by State, and had it not been for your active pro legalization effort, the millions of lives wasted due to recreational drugs probably wouldn't have happened (but hey, ruining your life and the lives of others is a constitutional right ey Dr. Paul?).
Now on to your interesting article:
So a drugged up drag queen who threatens to kill his boyfriend shouldn't have his firearm(s) temporarily confiscated?
Oh and by the way Dr. Paul: "Our Constitution was made ONLY for a moral and religious people, it is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I'm really beginning to love the State of Alabama. Not only did they give us the 10 Commandments Judge Roy Moore, they've told the nation that every unborn child has a God-given right to live (Donald Trump and his Republcrat Party doesn't agree: https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-alabama-abortion-law-2019-5 )

Now the State of Alabama is telling those who support the celebration of sexual perversion to leave their children alone!

Alabama Public Television refuses to air Arthur episode with gay wedding

May 20, 2019

Alabama Public Television chose not to air PBS’s Arthur episode that included a same-sex marriage.
In the episode, which aired nationwide May 13, Arthur and his friends attend their beloved teacher Mr. Ratburn’s nuptials to his partner...

Mike Mckenzie, director of programming at APT, said APT was notified by WGBH and PBS in mid-April about the episode titled “Mr. Ratburn and the Special Someone” and decided to show a re-run. Mckenzie said APT has no plans to air the episode at a later date.

“Parents have trusted Alabama Public Television for more than 50 years to provide children’s programs that entertain, educate and inspire,” Mckenzie said in an email. “More importantly – although we strongly encourage parents to watch television with their children and talk about what they have learned afterwards – parents trust that their children can watch APT without their supervision. We also know that children who are younger than the ‘target’ audience for Arthur also watch the program.”
APT previously pulled an episode of Arthur in 2005, when Buster, a bunny character in Arthur visited a girl who had two mothers.

Read more: https://www.al.com/news/2019/05/ala...s-to-air-arthur-episode-with-gay-wedding.html

More indoctrination of children to accept homosexuality with the public television show 'Arthur'.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

How that decriminalization of homosexuality worldwide effort coming along Donald Trump and Richard Grenell (Trump's openly homosexual Ambassador to Germany who proposed it)?

Kenya’s High Court Unanimously Upholds Ban on Homosexual Sex

May 25, 2019

NAIROBI (Reuters) — Kenya’s high court on Friday upheld a law banning gay sex, keeping same sex relations punishable by 14 years in jail in the East African nation and drawing strong criticism from the United Nations and rights activists.
Same-sex relationships are a crime in more than 70 countries around the world, almost half of them in Africa. Neighboring Uganda once enacted a law imposing a life sentence for certain acts of gay sex although it was later nullified by court.
South Africa is the only African nation to have legalized gay marriage.

“We hereby decline the relief sought and dismiss the combined petition,” Justice Roselyn Aburili told a packed courtroom in Kenya’s capital Nairobi, relaying the unanimous opinion of the three-justice panel.
https://christiannews.net/2019/05/25/kenyas-high-court-unanimously-upholds-ban-on-homosexual-sex/

 

[aCultureWarrior]

"Kenya’s high court on Friday upheld a law banning gay sex, keeping same sex relations punishable by 14 years in jail in the East African nation..."

Someone commented that receiving 14 years jailtime for homosexual behavior is a bit harsh. I commented that the homosexual 'deathstyle' is even more harsh and being separated from God for eternity is even harsher. The important thing about the criminalization of homosexuality is that these people will be subjected to the criminal justice system (therapy, jailtime or therapy while in jail) and that the homosexual movement (i.e. the 'gay' agenda) won't be allowed to organize and indoctrinate children and change invaluable institutions like it has here in the US and other western countries.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Continuing with the table of contents: Pages 10 through 20.

Homosexual Perversion-fest – Mid-Atlantic Leather Weekend – Returns to DC and Hyatt Regency; page 10, post #136
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5174693&viewfull=1#post5174693

[Trump'sSecretary of State Rex Tillerson's] State Department Spending $592,500 to ‘Explore Gender Identities of Boys and Men in Kenya’
Taxpayer-funded study blames terrorism on 'ideals of masculinity'; page 10, post #139
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5177062&viewfull=1#post5177062

Amnesty Don offering citizenship to 1.8 million "Dreamers" (one million higher than Obama) ; page 10, post #148
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5180626&viewfull=1#post5180626

Peter LaBarbera of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality uses pro homosexual/pro abortion Libertarian John Stossel video to slam the Southern Poverty Law Center; page 11, post #154
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5183433&viewfull=1#post5183433

LaBarbera on 'gay' Christian Guy Benson and Prager U video; page 11, post #155
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5184325&viewfull=1#post5184325

Judge Rules in Favor of Christian Baker Who Refused to Bake Cake for Same-sex Wedding...for the wrong reason; page 11, post #159
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5187971&viewfull=1#post5187971

MassResistance table BANNED from CPAC – after having been accepted. Because of our 2015 comments about the “culture war” (but a homosexual group is allowed); page 12, post #166
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5195122&viewfull=1#post5195122

What is cheap grace? page 12, post #168
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5195122&viewfull=1#post5195122

Trump's Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos is not as conservative as you think; page 12, post #178, page 17, post #249 and 255
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5195726&viewfull=1#post5195726
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5197039&viewfull=1#post5197039
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5199204&viewfull=1#post5199204

Brian Camenker on dealing with the sleazy LGBT movement and not being nice, kept his group out of CPAC. Michael Brown video entitled "The Truth about Adulterated Doctrine". page 13, post #186
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5196366&viewfull=1#post5196366

28 Photos Of Kids At Pride Parades Who Know That Love Is Love: The beauty of children celebrating the LGBTQ community in a rainbow-filled list (homosexual indoctrination of youth); page 17, post #241
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5196582&viewfull=1#post5196582

More on MassResistance being banned from CPAC: Phony Perkins and his Family Research Council allow Log Cabin Republicans but not MassResistance; page 17, post #248
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5197022&viewfull=1#post5197022

Donald Trump speech as CPAC: Does he want to strip 18-21 year olds of their 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights? page 18, post #256
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5200823&viewfull=1#post5200823

 

[Arthur Brain]

"Kenya’s high court on Friday upheld a law banning gay sex, keeping same sex relations punishable by 14 years in jail in the East African nation..."

Someone commented that receiving 14 years jailtime for homosexual behavior is a bit harsh. I commented that the homosexual 'deathstyle' is even more harsh and being separated from God for eternity is even harsher. The important thing about the criminalization of homosexuality is that these people will be subjected to the criminal justice system (therapy, jailtime or therapy while in jail) and that the homosexual movement (i.e. the 'gay' agenda) won't be allowed to organize and indoctrinate children and change invaluable institutions like it has here in the US and other western countries.

So, therapy that hasn't been proven to work at all and even former practitioners "coming out" and admitting that they're still "gay" still doesn't register for you does it? What sets the West apart from places like the above, Uganda etc is that they don't enforce laws based on "religion" that usurp freedom and personal liberty in adult relations.

What has this blog of yours achieved exactly?

 

[ok doser]

"Kenya’s high court on Friday upheld a law banning gay sex, keeping same sex relations punishable by 14 years in jail in the East African nation..."

Someone commented that receiving 14 years jailtime for homosexual behavior is a bit harsh. I commented that the homosexual 'deathstyle' is even more harsh and being separated from God for eternity is even harsher. The important thing about the criminalization of homosexuality is that these people will be subjected to the criminal justice system (therapy, jailtime or therapy while in jail) and that the homosexual movement (i.e. the 'gay' agenda) won't be allowed to organize and indoctrinate children and change invaluable institutions like it has here in the US and other western countries.

:thumb:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
"Kenya’s high court on Friday upheld a law banning gay sex, keeping same sex relations punishable by 14 years in jail in the East African nation..."

Someone commented that receiving 14 years jailtime for homosexual behavior is a bit harsh. I commented that the homosexual 'deathstyle' is even more harsh and being separated from God for eternity is even harsher. The important thing about the criminalization of homosexuality is that these people will be subjected to the criminal justice system (therapy, jailtime or therapy while in jail) and that the homosexual movement (i.e. the 'gay' agenda) won't be allowed to organize and indoctrinate children and change invaluable institutions like it has here in the US and other western countries.

So, therapy that hasn't been proven to work at all and even former practitioners "coming out" and admitting that they're still "gay" still doesn't register for you does it?

No, your comment saying that "therapy that hasn't been proven to work at all" doesn't register, as many people that have had spiritual therapy through Jesus Christ, and others that have had professional psychological therapy, or those that have combined the two have proven you wrong.

What sets the West apart from places like the above, Uganda etc is that they don't enforce laws based on "religion" that usurp freedom and personal liberty in adult relations.

The Kenyan law wasn't based on religion, my comment about being separated from God for eternity is something that those who proudly engage in homosexuality should know.

What has this blog of yours achieved exactly?

Other than making you feel extremely uncomfortable, the truth has been shared with many. I'm hoping that some of those following this 5 part thread embrace it.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Setting the stage for the upcoming (pro LGBT) SCOTUS cases,
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-5&p=5333954&viewfull=1#post5333954

the Supreme Court sides with transgender so-called 'rights' by refusing to hear a case in Pennsylvania.

Supreme Court Declines Case on 'Transgender Rights' In School Policy Controversial school policy allows trans students to choose restrooms

May 28, 2019

A high profile dispute over a school policy allowing s transgender pupils to choose which locker rooms and restrooms they want to use will not be taken up by the U.S. Supreme Court, according to reports. The controversial school policy that is in dispute was adopted by the Boyertown Area School District in Pennsylvania in the 2016-2017, allowing transgender students to use school facilities based on their 'identity' rather than actual sex. Following the court's declination to hear the case, the school district's policy remains intact. At the center of the case is student, Joel Doe, who learned of the policy while changing in the men’s locker room at his school, during which he saw a female student wearing only a bra.

The student, along with others raised concerns with the school about the new policy but was told to make it seem “natural,” according to court filings.

According to The Washington Examiner: Joel Doe then filed a lawsuit challenging the school district’s policy and asked the courts to restore a previous rule allowing for single-sex, multi-user locker rooms and restrooms. Doe’s lawyers argue the Boyertown Area School District violated the privacy rights of students and warned that “forcing a teenager to share a locker room or restroom with a member of the opposite sex can cause embarrassment and discomfort, particularly for students who have been victims of sexual assault.”

The federal district court, however, denied Doe’s request, and the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit affirmed the lower court’s ruling. The student, the appeals court said, has a “constitutionally protected privacy interest in his or her partially closed body,” but upheld the Boyertown Area School District’s policy because it “served a compelling interest — preventing prejudice against transgender students — and was narrowly tailored to that interested.”

READ MORE: https://neonnettle.com/news/7633-supreme-court-declines-case-on-transgender-rights-in-school-policy

"The student, along with others raised concerns with the school about the new policy but was told to make it seem “natural,” according to court filings."


I.e. Just pretend that things that are unnatural are natural.


And get used to the phrase: "serves a compelling interest--preventing prejudice against..."

 

[Arthur Brain]

No, your comment saying that "therapy that hasn't been proven to work at all" doesn't register, as many people that have had spiritual therapy through Jesus Christ, and others that have had professional psychological therapy, or those that have combined the two have proven you wrong.

Um, well no, what's been proven is that "conversion therapy" is complete quack science and harmful hence the shut down and laws against them being able to practice. Also that some of those who practised this rubbish have admitted they're still homosexual themselves and acknowledged that it doesn't do any good and apologised for the harm they've caused.

The Kenyan law wasn't based on religion, my comment about being separated from God for eternity is something that those who proudly engage in homosexuality should know.

Eh? Of course it is, a quick google search confirmed it. Your personal and narrow beliefs are not fact by any stretch.

Other than making you feel extremely uncomfortable, the truth has been shared with many. I'm hoping that some of those following this 5 part thread embrace it.

Your blog has never made anyone uncomfortable, it's left alone for the most part.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
No, your comment saying that "therapy that hasn't been proven to work at all" doesn't register, as many people that have had spiritual therapy through Jesus Christ, and others that have had professional psychological therapy, or those that have combined the two have proven you wrong.

Um, well no, what's been proven is that "conversion therapy" is complete quack science and harmful hence the shut down and laws against them being able to practice. Also that some of those who practised this rubbish have admitted they're still homosexual themselves and acknowledged that it doesn't do any good and apologised for the harm they've caused.

The two hundred brave men and women who attended the recent WA DC Freedom March are living testimony that same sex desires can be defeated through Christ (and psychological therapy) and that the homosexual/culture of death can be left behind without doing so in the typical fashion (in a body bag).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=256&v=D1bCwLM3uIM
https://www.wnd.com/2019/05/look-at-this-they-say-we-dont-exist/

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
The Kenyan law wasn't based on religion, my comment about being separated from God for eternity is something that those who proudly engage in homosexuality should know.

Eh? Of course it is, a quick google search confirmed it.

There is a Judeo-Christian moral basis behind the law, if that's what you're trying to say.

Your personal and narrow beliefs are not fact by any stretch.

If you believe that there is such a thing as a 'gay' Christian, make your case.

 

[Arthur Brain]

The two hundred brave men and women who attended the recent WA DC Freedom March are living testimony that same sex desires can be defeated through Christ (and psychological therapy) and that the homosexual/culture of death can be left behind without doing so in the typical fashion (in a body bag).

Um, no, it's not proof. Even the article doesn't stipulate that people are free from same sex attractions. They may very well be celibate, live single lives but "cured" from being gay/bi? Nope.

There is a Judeo-Christian moral basis behind the law, if that's what you're trying to say.

No, it wasn't and you were wrong to say that such laws aren't based on religion.

If you believe that there is such a thing as a 'gay' Christian, make your case.

That wasn't even what I was referring to in my reply but as it goes, if a Christian has same sex attractions and lives a celibate life then is that a problem for you or only if they act on such?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
The two hundred brave men and women who attended the recent WA DC Freedom March are living testimony that same sex desires can be defeated through Christ (and psychological therapy) and that the homosexual/culture of death can be left behind without doing so in the typical fashion (in a body bag).

Um, no, it's not proof. Even the article doesn't stipulate that people are free from same sex attractions. They may very well be celibate, live single lives but "cured" from being gay/bi? Nope.

So the general rule of reasoning amongst the LGBT movement is to believe a 10 year old boy who comes out as 'gay' (i.e. he was raped by a homosexual elder at a young age and had his view of human sexuality terribly skewed) but not adults who have had spiritual and/or psychological therapy to help overcome their unwanted same sex desires?

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
There is a Judeo-Christian moral basis behind the law, if that's what you're trying to say.

No, it wasn't and you were wrong to say that such laws aren't based on religion.

Yes, all laws have a moral basis, either from God or secular humanist man.

Speaking of Kenya: It appears at one time that they did an anal exam of those males arrested for homosexuality.

"Last year, an appeals court in Mombasa ruled that forced anal exams on people who are suspected of same-sex activity are unconstitutional,"
https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/24/health/kenya-lgbtqi-ruling-intl/index.html

Can you believe that homosexuals use the anal cavity, an orifice that was designed to expel human waste, for sex? I believe it's called "buggery".

Pretty sick huh?

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
If you believe that there is such a thing as a 'gay' Christian, make your case.

That wasn't even what I was referring to in my reply but as it goes, if a Christian has same sex attractions and lives a celibate life then is that a problem for you or only if they act on such?

Then that person would be like every other Christian: someone that struggles with sinful desires (note the keyword "struggle" in that sentence), not someone whose identity is homosexuality and attempts to mix it in with Christianity.

BTW, Someone who identifies as a Christian yet is content with sinful desires goes against the teachings of Jesus.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=27&v=XUXhKbHMGJg