Arthur Brain
Well-known member
I want to thank all 3 of you for your words of wisdom and your contribution to my 5 part thread.
You're welcome, someone has to impart some after all...
I want to thank all 3 of you for your words of wisdom and your contribution to my 5 part thread.
Some folk think that people having heterosexual relationships out of wedlock is "perverse"...
... and should be punishable.
Consenting adults have the right to a private and sexual life without state involvement, religious or otherwise.
In one sense you're correct if Brunei enforces such laws, they'd be being murdered, not punished. Presumably you're also alluding to actual sex acts which falls under the above.
Oh, and I know I said you were going on ignore but I decided against it for now...
it is
it should be
i understand that's the way libtards like you justify the corruption of society and the perversion of children
right, it all depends on how you define "being gay"
in brunei and other places, the law only applies when faggots put their perverted desires in action
don't care
when did perversion become a basic human right?
in your libtard mind, does repeating your statement seem like a win to you?
When God gave man a free will. :chew:
in your libtard mind, does repeating your statement seem like a win to you?
:shut:
A balanced and non extremist worldview = libtard to you?
:idunno:
Okay.
right, you and i have chewed on this before
i'm right, you're wrong
there, i think i've covered all the ground we need to cover here :wave2:
Which shows you aren't thinking far enough ahead, doser.
and don't intend to :wave2:
and don't intend to :wave2:
when i was a kid, when your parents were kids, society recognized that the following were wrong and in most cases, the law reflected that:
abortion
pornography
divorce
adultery
homosexuality
was Britain extremist in the fifties and sixties, when their societal values recognized that those things were wrong?
Britain wasn't stoning people to death for being gay, getting divorced, owning pornography or having affairs in the 50's and 60's. There were still areas where racial segregation was tolerated and like the US, things progressed and draconian attitudes were dispensed with. Where it comes to abortion then that was going on long before the 50's along with the rest also.
Sorry if that's a problem for you.
Hey, how come you keep waving at me? :think:
That's not an answer to my question
Sure it was. Just like the US, Britain had to do away with ill informed prejudices and ignorance and both have. That's a good thing.