For those outside of TOL following this thread: I finally got an answer from WizardozOz (he is my very bestest friend in the whooole wide world don'tcha know) regarding the above post. I'll share it here and continue to share any correspondence here (unless WizardofOz comes into the thread and says otherwise).
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
It's been well established that the WAPO lied about Moore sexually harassing and molesting teenage girls.
Originally Posted by WizardofOz
Um, no. WAPO reports what their investigation turned up. How did they lie? It's one thing to say these women lied but WAPO didn't lie. These women obviously told them about their respective recollection of events.
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Evidence should be required when accusing someone of sexual misconduct. Once the little evidence that was provided was shown to be false (the yearbook and one of the accusers description of the restaurant that she was allegedly molested out back), then a retraction should be done, which WAPO hasn't done.
But since WAPO has backed Democrat Doug Jones in this Senate race, I can understand why.
Since you've taken a personal interest in smearing Judge Roy Moore, present all of the information that WAPO published from the various accusers, and I'll show that it can be proven that either they have presented bold faced lies or that they have an ulterior motive for smearing Moore's reputation.
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Let's discuss those lies first Aaron and once we both agree that the rainbow flag wavers at the WAPO are pathetic liars, let's talk about how the liars at WAPO are calling a 501c3 tax exempt organization that "fights to protect the Constitution and protect the heritage of our Country" a "charity".
WARNING! Left wingers/Libertarians are going to find the following website disgusting, as it mentions God numerous times!
http://morallaw.org/
Quote: Originally posted by WizardofOz
Semantics. Your feathers are ruffled over whether or not it's technically a "charity"? That isn't significant enough to even debate. As [MENTION=7390]rexlunae[/MENTION] correctly pointed out it has to do with their 501(c)(3) tax exempt status and that they accept charitable donations.
In short, who cares?
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
If you're going to start calling all 501c3's "charities" Aaron, then refer to the baby butchers at Planned Parenthood and NARAL as "charities" as well, as like Judge Roy Moore's non profit organization, they too are tax exempt (except Moore's organization doesn't accept taxpayer dollars to stay afloat).
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...-believe-you&p=5141487&viewfull=1#post5141487
Let's hope that WizardofOz returns to the thread to continue his smear campaign against Judge Roy Moore, as I look forward to exposing this terrible injustice further.