Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior

Brian Brown, the President and co-founder of the National Organization of Marriage, went into the home of one of the sickest perverts known to mankind (Dan Savage) and not only dined and laughed with him, but debated him on various topics that were irrelevant to homosexuality.

To my knowledge, pro lifers have never met with pro abortionists and debated, why would Brown lower himself and give a certain amount of validity to a pervert like Dan Savage?

If Brown really wanted to destroy Savage and his message, all he would have had to have done is to show the disease that runs rampant amongst those that engage in homosexual behavior. Brown then could have put the final nail in the proverbial coffin by showing how the homosexual movement (Dan Savage included) indoctrinate innocent children to accept homosexuality as something normal.

So needless to say, Brian Brown of NOM isn't someone that should be fighting this aspect of the culture war.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...postcount=1140

Well, I was sort of joking about Savage. I think Brian Brown had to "face facts" about what people would and would not accept as true, regardless of the actual facts.

A chart from the CDC showing how those who engage in homosexual behavior disproportionately are afflicted with AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases would have been enough for people to "accept as true".

Pictures of children being taken to gay pride parades where public nudity is accepted and literally flaunted in the face of children would have been more than sufficient evidence to be "accepted as true".

BTW: The guys at work have a little coffee bet going with me:

They say you were high on meth when you typed these posts last night, I say that you're a coke head.

Mark it well, Karl; Mark it well: Do you have ears to hear and a mind to understand?
Take care, Karl. Take care.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4006566&postcount=1438

You're just mad that you can't write like I can, Iron Closet,
and that I'm the one riding the bicycle, Daddy (Karl).

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4006577&postcount=1441

Which is it?

meth

or

coke?

Neither is good for your psychosis.

 

[GFR7]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior

Brian Brown, the President and co-founder of the National Organization of Marriage, went into the home of one of the sickest perverts known to mankind (Dan Savage) and not only dined and laughed with him, but debated him on various topics that were irrelevant to homosexuality.

To my knowledge, pro lifers have never met with pro abortionists and debated, why would Brown lower himself and give a certain amount of validity to a pervert like Dan Savage?

If Brown really wanted to destroy Savage and his message, all he would have had to have done is to show the disease that runs rampant amongst those that engage in homosexual behavior. Brown then could have put the final nail in the proverbial coffin by showing how the homosexual movement (Dan Savage included) indoctrinate innocent children to accept homosexuality as something normal.

So needless to say, Brian Brown of NOM isn't someone that should be fighting this aspect of the culture war.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...postcount=1140



A chart from the CDC showing how those who engage in homosexual behavior disproportionately are afflicted with AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases would have been enough for people to "accept as true".

Pictures of children being taken to gay pride parades where public nudity is accepted and literally flaunted in the face of children would have been more than sufficient evidence to be "accepted as true".

BTW: The guys at work have a little coffee bet going with me:

They say you were high on meth when you typed these posts last night, I say that you're a coke head.


http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4006566&postcount=1438



http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4006577&postcount=1441

Which is it?

meth

or

coke?

Neither is good for your psychosis.

I have smoked cigarettes and drank beer and Scotch in my life. (very, very small amounts)

Nothing else. No pot, no coke, no drugs.

I think you and your friends are too dim-witted to grasp the parody.
You've likely never heard of the political play it was based on, IC.
You still work??? At your age? I thought you were a retired cop :think: Liar. . .

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I have smoked cigarettes and drank beer and Scotch in my life. Nothing else. No pot, no coke, no drugs.
I think you and your friends are too dim-witted to grasp the parody. You likely never heard of the political play it was based on, IC.

No, we aint cultured like you fags is.

WARNING! Some nudity (in the name of "art").

http://fiercerthanyou.com/2010/12/19/daddy-karl/
http://www.amazon.com/Cracks-Iron-Closet-Travels-Lesbian/dp/0226815684

Moving on...

 

[GFR7]

No, we aint cultured like you fags is.

http://fiercerthanyou.com/2010/12/19/daddy-karl/
http://www.amazon.com/Cracks-Iron-Closet-Travels-Lesbian/dp/0226815684

Moving on...

You got it all wrong, sugar. :nono:

`1. Iron Closet is a term in Provincetown, it means a closeted gay who won't come out, ever.

2. Karl refers to Orwell's analysis of Karl Marx. To call someone Karl is like calling a girl "Mary". You've been typed.

3. "It depends on who's riding the bicycle, Daddy" is from Tennessee Williams, "Camino Real".

4. "Daddy" is a term of respect butch-on-the-bottom boys call the men they worship.

:wave2:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
No, we aint cultured like you fags is.

http://fiercerthanyou.com/2010/12/19/daddy-karl/
http://www.amazon.com/Cracks-Iron-Cl.../dp/0226815684

Moving on...

You got it all wrong, sugar. :nono:

`1. Iron Closet is a term in Provincetown, it means a closeted gay who won't come out, ever.

2. Karl refers to Orwell's analysis of Karl Marx. To call someone Karl is like calling a girl "Mary". You've been typed.

3. "It depends on who's riding the bicycle, Daddy" is from Tennessee Williams, "Camino Real".

4. "Daddy" is a term of respect butch-on-the-bottom boys call the men they worship.

:wave2:

Why am I not surprised that you have all of the homosexual 'lingo' down pat?

I don't recall if it was in part 1 or 2, but I posted a link to the

"GLTB Slang Dictionary"
http://andrejkoymasky.com/lou/dic/dic00.html

What a sick subculture the homosexual lifestyle is.

How can you live such a life GFR7?

 

[GFR7]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
No, we aint cultured like you fags is.

http://fiercerthanyou.com/2010/12/19/daddy-karl/
http://www.amazon.com/Cracks-Iron-Cl.../dp/0226815684

Moving on...




Why am I not surprised that you have all of the homosexual 'lingo' down pat?

I don't recall if it was in part 1 or 2, but I posted a link to the

"GLTB Slang Dictionary"
http://andrejkoymasky.com/lou/dic/dic00.html

What a sick subculture the homosexual lifestyle is.

How can you live such a life GFR7?

You know I do not live such a life. You know from back in July that I told you why I had a connection to Provincetown (family property/ reporting). Are you unaware that there are straight families - husbands, wives, kids - who summer there? Stop wishing for what cannot be.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

You know I do not live such a life. You know from back in July that I told you why I had a connection to Provincetown (family property/ reporting).

You have a "connection" alright. Why don't you stop all of this foolishness by pretending to be something that you're not and just admit that you're a limp wrister who has much to lose by having your chosen behavior recriminalized?

You're winning the culture war Bruth, and it's more than likely that you'll die from a STD or at the hands of someone you met in a public restroom toilet stall before homosexuality is recriminalized (or at the hands of a dad that doesn't like his 11 year old son being sodomized).

Spoiler

aCultureWarrior gives GFR7 a wink and a smile and says:

"Let's be careful out there."

 

[GFR7]

You have a "connection" alright. Why don't you stop all of this foolishness by pretending to be something that you're not and just admit that you're a limp wrister who has much to lose by having your chosen behavior recriminalized?

You're winning the culture war Bruth, and it's more than likely that you'll die from a STD or at the hands of someone you met in a public restroom toilet stall before homosexuality is recriminalized (or at the hands of a dad that doesn't like his 11 year old son being sodomized).

Spoiler

aCultureWarrior gives GFR7 a wink and a smile and says:

"Let's be careful out there."

I was/am eternally married and now I'm celibate since 2006.
I have literally 0% chance of any STDs or any trouble.
I've never been gay and have no fears of an anti-gay backlash (although I would not like to see the non-harmful gays hurt, and yes, I know more about it than you do).
Stop cultivating your delusions.
Are you going to wind up like that Christian preacher who killed himself
by accident with the scuba suit??? Nooo, no no no.
Wake up, brother, before your delusions destroy you.

 

[Arthur Brain]

I was/am eternally married and now I'm celibate since 2006.
I have literally 0% chance of any STDs or any trouble.
I've never been gay and have no fears of an anti-gay backlash (although I would not like to see the non-harmful gays hurt, and yes, I know more about it than you do).
Stop cultivating your delusions.
Are you going to wind up like that Christian preacher who killed himself
by accident with the scuba suit??? Nooo, no no no.
Wake up, brother, before your delusions destroy you.

He's an ineffectual witless clown, just pay no heed to his feeble little slurs.

 

[GFR7]

He's an ineffectual witless clown, just pay no heed to his feeble little slurs.

I know, but my silence would be just the confirmation he would need.

I really do wish we all had a conference where we all had to meet in person.

I wonder how likely he would be to look any of us in the eye and say these things, especially if people came with wives and children.

The internet breeds the kind of one-sided delusional person and bully he is.

My bet is he would be quite awkward and silent at such a conference, and would strike people as a shrinking violet.

On another forum I was on in 2008, we did have such a conference of about 30 members, in Europe. The most arrogant, bullying , dominating member wound up being an oafish, over-weight, shy man with thick glasses who clammed up in the face of much more attractive and articulate people. He was nothing without his screen and keyboard - and it later came out that he was a registered sex offender in Great Britain.

 

[Arthur Brain]

I know, but my silence would be just the confirmation he would need.

I really do wish we all had a conference where we all had to meet in person.

I wonder how likely he would be to look any of us in the eye and say these things, especially if people came with wives and children.

The internet breeds the kind of one-sided delusional person and bully he is.

My bet is he would be quite awkward and silent at such a conference, and would strike people as a shrinking violet.

On another forum I was on in 2008, we did have such a conference of about 30 members, in Europe. The most arrogant, bullying , dominating member wound up being an oafish, over-weight, shy man with thick glasses who clammed up in the face of much more attractive and articulate people. He was nothing without his screen and keyboard - and it later came out that he was a registered sex offender in Great Britain.

Oh quite possibly. It's very easy to bluster behind the anonymity of a keyboard. I highly doubt aCW would even entertain the possibility of a conference where his face would actually be seen...

 

[GFR7]

Oh quite possibly. It's very easy to bluster behind the anonymity of a keyboard. I highly doubt aCW would even entertain the possibility of a conference where his face would actually be seen...

:think: Probably not. . .

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I was/am eternally married and now I'm celibate since 2006.
I have literally 0% chance of any STDs or any trouble.
I've never been gay and have no fears of an anti-gay backlash (although I would not like to see the non-harmful gays hurt, and yes, I know more about it than you do).
Stop cultivating your delusions.
Are you going to wind up like that Christian preacher who killed himself
by accident with the scuba suit??? Nooo, no no no.
Wake up, brother, before your delusions destroy you.

While updating the table of contents I came across this post that was written by you a month ago:

3. I need not love persons - family or not - who have done extreme harm to me and my family, and never repented of it. Jesus tells us to forgive "7 x 70" for those who repent. These people did not. If you want to love them, be my guest. Let's see how you fare with them. I really don't think St. Paul was too loving when he consigned to hell everyone who practiced what he found sinful.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3970822&postcount=676

You've been hurt beyond words by someone/people who engaged in homosexual pedophilia GFR7. While it would be nice if you would talk about it here, I know that you won't.

There are many good people on TOL who you can talk to, people who can give you spiritual advice so that you can leave this living hell that you are currently experiencing. I also frequently give a plug for the good people at NARTH who work with people with homosexual desires and have great success.
http://www.narth.com/


You're not alone GFR7, countless people have experienced what you have and come out of it just fine. It's just a matter of having faith in God and doing the necessary things to overcome it.

God bless.

aCW

 

[GFR7]

Thank you.

 

[serpentdove]

Two Sodomites hanged in Iran :Letsargu:

Homosexuality is: forbidden (Lev. 18:22), considered an abomination (1 Kin. 14:24), punishment for (Lev. 20:13), unclean (Rom. 1:24, 26, 27). :vomit:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Thank you.

You're welcome.

Returning to the segment on

homosexual violence,

I want to address a comment that you made a few posts ago:

I've never been gay and have no fears of an anti-gay backlash (although I would not like to see the non-harmful gays hurt, and yes, I know more about it than you do).

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4007798&postcount=1468

First of all, there is no such thing as a "non-harmful homosexual". The physical nature of the act of homosexuality in and of itself is harmful. It doesn't matter if it's anal or oral sex, male to male or female to female relationships, it's been shown throughout this 3 part thread (and will be shown in detail in the segment on disease and early death) that homosexual behavior is inherently harmful.

Secondly: Those who are proud and unrepentant about their behavior (which this 3 part thread is all about), overwhelmingly vote for political candidates and causes that promote their extremely harmful agenda.

I'd shown in an earlier thread that the homosexual vote was the deciding factor in a Presidential election. An election that brought an extremely pro abortion-pro homosexual candidate into office.

While there are supposed "conservative" homosexuals (Bryan Fischer said it best when he stated "Anal sex is not a conservative value") who belong to the Log Cabin Republicans and/or GOProud organizations, they're only economically conservative and are just as liberal on social issues as their democratic allies.

With the decriminalization of homosexuality, it gives those that would normally be hiding their immoral behavior (and those who were caught in the act would be getting much needed help) the freedom to go out in public and recruit innocent children, adopt them and indoctrinate them, make legislation that harms those that need help (anti reparative therapy laws), make laws that prohibit discrimination against homosexuals (civil suits and threats of jail time against Christians or those who simply speak out against homosexuality), and as will be shown in the continuing segment on homosexual violence/serial killers: the freedom to meet others in settings (bars, bathhouses, etc.) where someone ends up murdered.

 

[GFR7]

You're welcome.

Returning to the segment on

homosexual violence,

I want to address a comment that you made a few posts ago:


http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4007798&postcount=1468

First of all, there is no such thing as a "non-harmful homosexual". The physical nature of the act of homosexuality in and of itself is harmful. It doesn't matter if it's anal or oral sex, male to male or female to female relationships, it's been shown throughout this 3 part thread (and will be shown in detail in the segment on disease and early death) that homosexual behavior is inherently harmful.

Secondly: Those who are proud and unrepentant about their behavior (which this 3 part thread is all about), overwhelmingly vote for political candidates and causes that promote their extremely harmful agenda.

I'd shown in an earlier thread that the homosexual vote was the deciding factor in a Presidential election. An election that brought an extremely pro abortion-pro homosexual candidate into office.

While there are supposed "conservative" homosexuals (Bryan Fischer said it best when he stated "Anal sex is not a conservative value") who belong to the Log Cabin Republicans and/or GOProud organizations, they're only economically conservative and are just as liberal on social issues as their democratic allies.

With the decriminalization of homosexuality, it gives those that would normally be hiding their immoral behavior (and those who were caught in the act would be getting much needed help) the freedom to go out in public and recruit innocent children, adopt them and indoctrinate them, make legislation that harms those that need help (anti reparative therapy laws), make laws that prohibit discrimination against homosexuals (civil suits and threats of jail time against Christians or those who simply speak out against homosexuality), and as will be shown in the continuing segment on homosexual violence/serial killers: the freedom to meet others in settings (bars, bathhouses, etc.) where someone ends up murdered.

I understand these points and I agree that this legalization and agenda was the final step in the feminist /sexual revolution which arose in the '60s and '70s.

My only point was, since so many married heterosexual couple report engaging in oral and anal sex, much of it gleaned from watching cable and internet porn (I don't think this is right , I am just stating facts) some of the gay couples who don't adopt and have their careers an homes are living lives not very different at all to these straight couples. Agreed?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I understand these points and I agree that this legalization and agenda was the final step in the feminist /sexual revolution which arose in the '60s and '70s.

Enough with your patronizing comments.

My only point was, since so many married heterosexual couple report engaging in oral and anal sex, much of it gleaned from watching cable and internet porn (I don't think this is right , I am just stating facts) some of the gay couples who don't adopt and have their careers an homes are living lives not very different at all to these straight couples. Agreed?

Do you mean those homosexuals that are "living so quietly that no one would ever know?"
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3135571&postcount=4
(Sigh, a brain is such a terrible thing to waste anna).

Of course I don't agree, because their is no comparing sex between a married heterosexual couple and those that engage in homosexuality.

 

[GFR7]

Enough with your patronizing comments.



Do you mean those homosexuals that are "living so quietly that no one would ever know?"
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3135571&postcount=4
(Sigh, a brain is such a terrible thing to waste anna).

Of course I don't agree, because their is no comparing sex between a married heterosexual couple and those that engage in homosexuality.

Stop calling my sincere statements 'patronizing'. They are nothing of the kind.

You are greatly in error if you think that the sexual problems in our culture are limited to homosexuals, and have not altered and changed and transformed heterosexuals as well.

Think of that Mormon fellow (Travis Alexander) who got himself killed by Jodi Arias: He was supposedly a "devout Mormon" but was engaging in anal and oral sex. He was living the gay lifestyle with a woman. If you follow the facts , you will see it is true.
A "devout Mormon"? I think not.

And if you believe that married couples engaging in anal and oral sex, use of sex toys and porn and threesomes, are "undefiled", then you are a LOT more sexually liberal than I am. You would be fine if gays would vanish, and we were left with a world of kinky straight couples. I would not be. I am the more conservative, that much is clear.

You feel the problem is smaller, and contained to gays.
I feel it is larger, and has engulfed the entire population.
If you recriminalize sodomy, are you limiting that word to anal sex only? (in fact, it includes other acts).
Will you arrest gays only, and allow straights to engage in it?
Will the problem be solved, then?
Answer these or your theory is flimsy.

*Paul said, "Marriage is an honor and the bed undefiled, but the fornicators and adulterers God will judge.".
But this translation says:
[Let] marriage [be] had in honor among all, and [let] the bed [be] undefiled: for fornicators and adulterers God will judge.Married heterosexuals can be judged as fornicators and adulterers even within the marriage. Ignore at your own peril.

Here is another translation:

Let married life be honoured among all of you
and not made unclean;
for men untrue in married life will be judged by God.
Marriage can be made untrue.
And not just with adultery , either.

For your own sake, aCW, in terms of your public campaign it is important to remember that as pernicious as the rainbow agenda is - and it is - it is a subset of a much larger liberal agenda which is everywhere and nowhere: Not easy to fight:

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”

I do think Dan Savage has been incredibly destructive, and not only with the gay community, but with the young college men and women whom he advises through his "Savage Love" syndication:

WARNING-LaBarbera has covered up the obscenity, and I am sorry it is there in the tweet; however it is important to see how this gay AND straight sexual advocate and same sex marriage advocate views things:

Take note that like myself,
Peter LaBarbera views Dan Savage as
encouraging straights to act like gays:

 

[GFR7]

Another sign that the sexual decadence problem is NOT confined to the homosexual crowd:

(forgive the racism of this site, with which I am NOT in agreement;
the article is still relevant ):

9th Grade Text Book Features Oral Sex, Vibrators and Bondage


http://www.dailystormer.com/9th-grade-text-book-features-oral-sex-vibrators-and-bondage/

There is a larger sexual agenda afoot which has its roots in postmodernism, revisionism, post-feminism, homosexual activism, and is being pushed by straight administrators as well: On these kids. Do you think oral sex, bondage, sex toys, should be part of their pre-marriage ideal?

Again, not just confined to the rainbow agenda, the sexualization agenda is larger and has fueled much of the gay campaign:

Sext Up KIDS: How Children are Becoming Hypersexualized

http://www.commercialfreechildhood.org/resource/sext-kids-how-children-are-becoming-hypersexualized