Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[Heterodoxical]

Two gay men killed by hanging in Iran

Homosexuality is: forbidden (Lev. 18:22), considered an abomination (1 Kin. 14:24), punishment for (Lev. 20:13), unclean (Rom. 1:24, 26, 27). :vomit:

Levitical laws were a covenant between God and the Jews. If you are part of Christ's church (you can hope to find that bus one day...) You are in a church established after the order of Melchizedek, not the Levitical laws. The levitical laws were a hunnerd or so years later than Mel's cameo in the OT.


Nearly every poster in here is an abomination to God. Pro 3:32

A false balance (unfair deal) is an abomination. Prov 11:1

A LIAR IS AN ABOMINATION, Proverbs 12:22
You don't seem to care about them though.

So the fact homosexual sex is a sin, has no bearing as you don't care that other sins get married. Duplicitous and double minded, what a great minister for God you are.

If you are man enough to discuss Romans 1 (rather than just eisegetically cherry pick parts to use as a sword on those you wish to lash out at) I'll be happy to accept that investment of time in your education.

 

[GFR7]

Levitical laws were a covenant between God and the Jews. If you are part of Christ's church (you can hope to find that bus one day...) You are in a church established after the order of Melchizedek, not the Levitical laws. The levitical laws were a hunnerd or so years later than Mel's cameo in the OT.


Nearly every poster in here is an abomination to God. Pro 3:32

A false balance (unfair deal) is an abomination. Prov 11:1

A LIAR IS AN ABOMINATION, Proverbs 12:22
You don't seem to care about them though.

So the fact homosexual sex is a sin, has no bearing as you don't care that other sins get married. Duplicitous and double minded, what a great minister for God you are.

If you are man enough to discuss Romans 1 (rather than just eisegetically cherry pick parts to use as a sword on those you wish to lash out at) I'll be happy to accept that investment of time in your education.

Heterodoxical, I hope you see my posts are making the same point.
To confine condemnation to gays is to bear false witness.

 

[Heterodoxical]

Two gay men killed by hanging in Iran

Homosexuality is: forbidden (Lev. 18:22), considered an abomination (1 Kin. 14:24), punishment for (Lev. 20:13), unclean (Rom. 1:24, 26, 27). :vomit:

Tell me, did you go to school and get special training to be so hatefully, snarkily, obnoxious or is it just a natural talent of yours?

 

[Heterodoxical]

Heterodoxical, I hope you see my posts are making the same point.
To confine condemnation to gays is to bear false witness.

We agree a whole LOT on this stuff.... I'm sure I could find things to disagree with you on if I was challenged.

 

[GFR7]

We agree a whole LOT on this stuff.... I'm sure I could find things to disagree with you on if I was challenged.

:cheers: - yeah, I reckon so.

 

[alwight]

@GFR7
You are clearly a reasonable and intelligent person while aCW is anything but.
There is no need to try and compensate for aCW, but by all means do keep poking him with a stick from time to time if you get something out it and can shrug off all the personal attacks. I don't think you'll ever get a rational dialog going whatever you say. lain:

 

[GFR7]

@GFR7
You are clearly a reasonable and intelligent person while aCW is anything but.
There is no need to try and compensate for aCW, but by all means do keep poking him with a stick from time to time if you get something out it and can shrug off all the personal attacks. I don't think you'll ever get a rational dialog going whatever you say. lain:

I do greatly appreciate your kind words; sadly, I too am losing hope that a rational dialog and good will will ever occur between myself and aCW

 

[aCultureWarrior]

You are greatly in error if you think that the sexual problems in our culture are limited to homosexuals, and have not altered and changed and transformed heterosexuals as well.

("But but but, heterosexuals do immoral/unnatural things too!").

The topic was addressed when I spent time discussing how the homosexual-sadomasochist-child molester Alfred Kinsey's fraudulent studies made mainstream America begin accepting immoral behaviors.

A society doesn't accept something as inherently perverse as homosexuality and expect to defeat things like abortion, adultery, cohabitation and no fault divorce.

BTW,you acknowledged that you have a severe problem, when are you going to seek the help that I suggested instead of wasting time defending homosexuality?

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4008319&postcount=1473

 

[GFR7]

("But but but, heterosexuals do immoral/unnatural things too!").

The topic was addressed when I spent time discussing how the homosexual-sadomasochist-child molester Alfred Kinsey's fraudulent studies made mainstream America begin accepting immoral behaviors.

A society doesn't accept something as inherently perverse as homosexuality and expect to defeat things like abortion, adultery, cohabitation and no fault divorce.

BTW,you acknowledged that you have a severe problem, when are you going to seek the help that I suggested instead of wasting time defending homosexuality?

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4008319&postcount=1473

1. I am NOT "defending homosexuality" - not in any way, shape, or form.

2. Thanks for your in-depth reply to my lengthy posting - NOT.

3. You don't really know what the "problem" is, do you? And what makes you think help wasn't already sought, and that the helpers didn't make it far worse than it was? Thanks as always for your compassion and help - NOT.

4. But, but, but, but, anal sex is not so bad if it is between straights, see????

Young men don’t think they need consent for anal sex
A new study shows that pain for women during anal sex is considered normal. It shouldn't be

http://www.salon.com/2014/08/14/you...ex/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialflow

 

[aCultureWarrior]

1. I am NOT "defending homosexuality" - not in any way, shape, or form.

2. Thanks for your in-depth reply to my lengthy posting - NOT.

3. You don't really know what the "problem" is, do you? And what makes you think help wasn't already sought, and that the helpers didn't make it far worse than it was? Thanks as always for your compassion and help - NOT.

4. But, but, but, but, anal sex is not so bad if it is between straights, see????

I conceded that my co-workers were right and paid off the coffee bet.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4007677&postcount=1461

 

[GFR7]

I conceded that my co-workers were right and paid off the coffee bet.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4007677&postcount=1461

I didn't watch and they were wrong, of course.

I have never done any drugs in my entire life.

I really thought you had more power to come back with solid arguments.
I can see you have no authentic come-backs.
You've left me riding the bicycle, Daddy :chuckle:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Returning to the segment on

homosexual violence:

Back on April 19th I did a review of various posts showing how violent those that partake in homosexual behavior can be.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3846878&postcount=6388

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3849005&postcount=6457

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3849053&postcount=6458

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3849981&postcount=6470

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3853262&postcount=6585

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3854042&postcount=6605

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3854130&postcount=6606

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3854502&postcount=6609

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3854551&postcount=6614

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3858625&postcount=6718

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3858729&postcount=6719

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3860232&postcount=6744

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3861332&postcount=6758

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3869686&postcount=7390

And then on page 499 I opened the segment on homosexual serial killers:

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3872121&postcount=7474

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3872616&postcount=7476

On page 500 I showed how the freedom to cruise homosexual bathhouses and bars allows these degenerates the opportunity to meet and eventually murder other homosexuals:

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3877018&postcount=7497

I then talked about homosexual serial killers Colin Ireland and Kirk Thompson, showing in this post how crystal meth is widespread amongst urban male homosexuals:

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3879084&postcount=7527

Studies show a higher prevalence of methamphetamine use among MSM than among the general population. For example, in a study of urban, young MSM (aged 15-22 years), conducted during 1994–1998, 20% of the participants reported having used methamphetamine during the past 6 months [6]. A 2001 study found that 15% of MSM in San Francisco had used methamphetamine during their most recent anal sex (within the past 3 months)―making methamphetamine use third only to the prevalence of alcohol and marijuana use [7].http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/pdf/meth.pdf

Ok, back later with more on homosexual serial killers and an excellent article by the boogeyman that hides underneath every homosexual's bed: Dr. Paul Cameron.

 

[GFR7]

Just a little thing to add.
As you are using some statistics from 20 years ago, I thought I might point out this article from
July 29, 2014, less than one month ago (United Kingdom):

Why is drug use higher in the gay community?

The headline figure in the Crime Survey for England & Wales is that drug use in the past year amongst gay and bisexual men is three times higher (33%) than use amongst heterosexual men (11.1%). For lesbian and bisexual women use is more than four times as high (22.9%) than for heterosexual women (5.1%).

Just as for heterosexuals, the most commonly used illicit drug amongst LGB people is cannabis, used by around 1 in 5 gay or bi men, and 1 in 6 lesbian or bi women. Compared with heterosexuals these rates are again much higher: more than twice as high for gay and bi men and a whopping four and a half times higher for lesbian and bi women.

The figures, in fact, show higher use across all drugs by LGB people; unsurprisingly the largest difference is in the use of amyl nitrite (poppers), the second most commonly used drug by gay and bi men, and 25 times more common than amongst straight men.
We also see large differences in ‘club’ drugs such as ecstasy (almost five times higher in LGB people) and ketamine (seven and a half times more common). Even drugs thought to be less associated with the gay community like heroin and crack cocaine see higher levels of use, although just as for heterosexuals use of these is thankfully very low.


http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/07/29/comment-why-is-drug-use-higher-in-the-gay-community/

 

[GFR7]

And July, 2014:

Crystal Meth 'drug of choice' among Gay Men:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...-for-gay-men/121767+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

 

[GFR7]

And Dan Savage does (or did) admit to having violent rape fantasies about Rick Santorum (as you also showed in the above link from NewsBusters)-

in his case, he really does believe that Santorum is a closeted gay (as you also insist I am) and believes such action would be therapeutic.

 

[jgarden]

Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights decision of the United States Supreme Court which invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage.

The case was brought by Mildred Loving, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, who had been sentenced to a year in prison in Virginia for marrying each other. Their marriage violated the state's anti-miscegenation statute, the Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which prohibited marriage between people classified as "white" and people classified as "colored". The Supreme Court's unanimous decision held this prohibition was unconstitutional, overturning Pace v. Alabama (1883) and ending all race-based legal restrictions on marriage in the United States.

The decision was followed by an increase in interracial marriages in the U.S., and is remembered annually on Loving Day, June 12. It has been the subject of two movies as well as songs. Beginning in 2013, it was cited as precedent in U.S. federal court decisions holding restrictions on same-sex marriage in the United States unconstitutional.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia

Given that "aCultureWarrior" wants to crimmialize homosexuals, I wonder what his opinion of interracial marriage, given that anti-miscegenation laws in some states preceeded American independence, and remained a crimminal offence in 17 states until the landmark Supreme Court decision in 1967.

"Loving v. Virginia" is currently being used to challenge state restrictions on same-sex marriage, questioning the government's constitutional right to deny the legal union of 2 consenting adults!

 

[GFR7]

Since aCW is focusing on gay violence, here is breaking news about a man shot by ex-boyfriend:

Police Seek Ex-Boyfriend in execution-style killing of gay man

A gay Minnesota activist and executive's life ended abruptly on Tuesday when he was shot to death at a gas station in Arden Hills, Minnesota. Police are searching for Lyle "Ty" Hoffman (below), an ex-boyfriend and former business associate of Kelly Phillips (above), a VP and general counsel at medical device company Boston Scientific and the co-founder of Lush Food Bar in Minneapolis, who died of multiple gunshot wounds at the scene of the shooting.

http://www.towleroad.com/2014/08/po...tyle-murder-of-gay-minneapolis-man-video.html

 

[Christian Liberty]

And I am not, I repeat, I am not libertarian nor Darwinian - minded. Please.

Do you understand what "libertarian" actually means?

Here's a quick hint, aCW doesn't know the answer.

 

[Christian Liberty]

Given that "aCultureWarrior" wants to crimmialize homosexuals, I wonder what his opinion of interracial marriage, given that anti-miscegenation laws in some states preceeded American independence, and remained a crimminal offence in 17 states until the landmark Supreme Court decision in 1967.

"Loving v. Virginia" is currently being used to challenge state restrictions on same-sex marriage, questioning the government's constitutional right to deny the legal union of 2 consenting adults!

As repulsive as restrictions on interracial marriage are, there's nothing in the US Constitution that prevents a state from having them.

THat said, interracial marriage doesn't fundamentally change the nature of what marriage is. Same sex marriage does.

Regarding "consent", people are actually arrested for consensually engaging in drug use and prostitution. They go to jail. Consenting adults who engage in homosex do not go to jail. The government may not RECOGNIZE their consensual relationship, but they don't prohibit it. Its unfortunate that liberals care more about their government benefits than they do about freedom, but I guess its no surprise.

I don't support laws against gay marriage. But I don't think the government should recognize gay marriage either. Since it isn't marriage.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

This is an interesting article from MSNBC showing how homosexual organizations are joining the Human Rights Campaign in solidarity with robber/attempted cop killer (Saint) Michael Brown.

Nation’s LGBT leaders stand in solidarity with Michael Brown

8-13014

The nation’s LGBT leaders have joined the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) to pen an open letter of solidarity in response to the killing of Michael Brown, the unarmed African-American teenager who was shot and killed by police on Saturday in Ferguson, Missouri.

The coalition of co-signers noted that Brown’s killing transcends LGBT rights. All equality movements are a deeply-connected fabric of the country and its unfulfilled promise of liberty and justice for all, the open letter said.

“It’s an issue that encompasses all communities that have experienced injustice,” said HRC spokesman Adam Talbot. “We can’t be silent because LGBT people come from all races and backgrounds.”
Read more: http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/nations-lgbt-leaders-stand-solidarity-michael-brown

This is a rather "queer" union as the Black community (along with the Mormons) were responsible for passing Prop 8, the pro traditional marriage legislation in California back in 2008.

Most of California's Black Voters Backed Gay Marriage Ban
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/06/AR2008110603880.html

It's even more "queer" that the drag queens and fairies at HRC and other homosexual organizations look to the Black community as allies, especially when young punks like (Saint) Michael Brown are notorious for beating up homosexuals.

Beaten for Being Gay in a Black Neighborhood

Being gay is “about the worst thing you can be in black culture,” said Don Lemon, a gay, black news anchor at CNN.

Sometimes you see can see the antipathy in hip hop videos. Other times at the ballot box. Still other times black hostility towards gay people is expressed in the dozens and dozens of hyper-violent episodes of black mob violence against gay people. Some on video.

These crimes are a perfect storm of silence: Predators do not want to get caught. Victims do not want to identify themselves as gay. And newspapers loathe reporting black mob violence.
Read more: http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/colin-flaherty/black-mob-violence-against-gays/

Of course the common denominator between the homosexual movement and the left wing faction of the Black community (i.e. Jesse "Who shall I shake down this week?" Jackson and Al Sharpton) is that they play the victim card to gain sympathy for their movement.

(We saw that numerous times with GFR7 in previous posts).

The homosexual movement has pretty much always had an intense hatred for law enforcement (who wouldn't be mad if a big bad policeman broke up your love tryst in the bushes of some public park and charged you with lewd act in a public place?).

Speaking of which: I see we have a couple of homosexualist cop haters and (Saint) Michael Brown fans here.

GFR7 and the Jr. Libertarian, tell us why you why both hate the police and support thugs like (Saint) Michael Brown...

(i.e. what was the name of the park you were busted in?).