Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[Arthur Brain]

Female on female is certainly bisexual. ACW certainly has that right. I have met many women who admit to being bisexual. I am pretty sure this dynamic is not a novel phenomenon in current history, I think it goes back to past cultures. Is a man that is turned on by 2 women bisexual, is he anymore bisexual than a man who watches heterosexual pornography, is he more bisexual than a man who only looks at soft porn like Playboy? The point is that any type of pornography has the possibility to desensitize people from one on one heterosexual romantic relations. I think once one starts down that road and continues then sexual addiction can take over and they can mistake sex for love.

aCW's 'conclusion' that a heterosexual man who enjoys seeing two or more of the opposite sex is bisexual is what was bizarre to be honest. He wouldn't be bisexual in the slightest because of that which was my point. Where it comes to the rest I've little argument really. I've certainly known more bisexual women in life than men...

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Perhaps we should have some heterosexual males come forward and tell us if they enjoy watching acts of homosexuality:

Art Brain, come on down (Art's a heterosexual, he told us 7 times in one post in part 1 that he is).

Alwight the atheist, come on down (Al's the George Clooney of Great Britain, except that Al is waiting to marry when he's 105).

Aaron, aka WizardofOz, come on down (unblock me first).

Anyone else that proclaims to be a heterosexual who enjoys watching homosexual acts come on down and share with us why (after all, it is quite common).

Well, I'm comfortable enough with being honest about my heterosexuality so if you have any doubts I don't particularly care frankly. It's not like you have any power to do anything so if I was homosexual I'd tell you easily enough as you'd be no threat whatsoever.

And it isn't 'quite common', it's very common among straight men. If it wasn't it wouldn't be reflected so heavily in the glamour industry, something that even you should be able to recognize...

I must have missed your answer somewhere in that rant Mr. Heterosexual as to whether or not you enjoy viewing two lesbians getting it on.

Please answer.


Quote:
Question: What do you call a heterosexual male that enjoys watching acts of homosexuality?

Answer: A bisexual (the "B" in the LGBT etc. etc. etc. acronym).

Seriously, how can even you be this dumb?!

The only way a heterosexual could actually be bisexual is if they're attracted to homosexual activity between both sexes genius...for a heterosexual man the only source of arousal would be between women.

Unreal...

You're absolutely right Art. Anyone that enjoys watching an act of homosexuality isn't a bisexual, he or she is a homosexual.

Thanks for the clarification.

 

[Heterodoxical]

Female on female is certainly bisexual.

By definition it's homosexual. :-| Man in water is DEFINITELY DRY!

ACW certainly has that right. I have met many women who admit to being bisexual. I am pretty sure this dynamic is not a novel phenomenon in current history, I think it goes back to past cultures. Is a man that is turned on by 2 women bisexual, is he anymore bisexual than a man who watches heterosexual pornography, is he more bisexual than a man who only looks at soft porn like Playboy?

A man turned on by watching two women is a voyeur. The attraction to two women stems from the man's desire to give and receive the masculine virtues of sex both. Thus seeing the woman being treated on by another woman, allows his brain to see himself as feminine receiving sexual attention.

It's based on the same psychological reasoning that you never see yourself in your own dreams, and project yourself out onto the people who are in your dreams.

The point is that any type of pornography has the possibility to desensitize people from one on one heterosexual romantic relations. I think once one starts down that road and continues then sexual addiction can take over and they can mistake sex for love.

Or lose the opportunity to ever see sex and love as tied together as one. They become totally separated events in a person's life.

 

[Christian Liberty]

For what its worth, as a heterosexual, I don't find the idea of two people of the same gender doing anything sexual to be attractive, even if its two women. Let's just leave it at that.

1. Please stop the silly/paranoid idea that I am the other poster (Junior the Libertarian).

Could I please ask that you not use that name? You may be under the impression that it is an old-username, but it is not. aCW started calling me "Junior" to make fun of me. Just saying.

The greater Metro New York City area is a vast region which includes northern New Jersey and suburban/ex-burbs of New York state. Just because you get 2 intellectual posters from that region does not mean we are one and the same. :doh: Kentucky does not give you a proper view of the United States.

lol! Good point.

He and I have different ideas and philosophies, and I only came on board this month, while he was apparently on vacation. I am sure he does not like LaBarbera, Kierkegaard, and Spinoza. :rotfl:

I don't actually know much about LaBarbera because I don't actually pay much attention to aCW's posts, and I find it hard to believe that anyone who is well known is actually as authoritarian as aCW is. I try to keep in mind that aCW has mentioned Chuck Baldwin and Pat Buchanan in a positive light as well, and neither of those guys are actually anything like aCW philosophically (Chuck even endorsed Ron Paul in '08 and I believe '12 as well.) So, I don't judge LaBarbera just because aCW likes him, I withhold judgement. I don't know anything at all about the other two guys.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

1. Please stop the silly/paranoid idea that I am the other poster...

I thought that we had an agreement via private mail :

There is no truth in your accusation, but of course I'll move on out of respect for your thread..

(How soon the youngins forget).

You've been exposed as a fraud numerous times in this thread, I don't want to waste anymore time exposing you.

Thanks for your cooperation in this matter.

 

[Arthur Brain]

I must have missed your answer somewhere in that rant Mr. Heterosexual as to whether or not you enjoy viewing two lesbians getting it on.

Please answer.

If it's two beautiful women then yes, I'm hardly repulsed at all, as I would be if it were two men.

You're absolutely right Art. Anyone that enjoys watching an act of homosexuality isn't a bisexual, he or she is a homosexual.

Thanks for the clarification.

You're a complete loon. One can only be a homosexual if you're attracted to your own gender engaged in sexual acts you nutcase...

:freak:

 

[Christian Liberty]

I thought that we had an agreement via private mail :



(How soon the youngins forget).

You've been exposed as a fraud numerous times in this thread, I don't want to waste anymore time exposing you.

Thanks for your cooperation in this matter.

You know, aCW must be a former cop. There's no way anyone this dumb would be able to get a free market job. I guess "Welfare queen" would be equally as likely.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

hey, you from the international school of inbreeding, ACW, it's a stone cold fact more than 80% of child molesters were molested as children and as such don't realize what they are doing is wrong as we can tell it's wrong.

So, once a child is molested, why don't we start beating them then? It's almost a guarantee they will molest a child at a point to some degree, and it's dang near a given they will be promiscuous and partake of dangerous sex acts....

Might as well kill them all. If they are stupid enough to get molested, which means most likely they will be a child molestor, we should kill them, right?

I see that you reported me for the story about the 18 year old homosexual child molester that "fall down go boom."

As I've said many times before in this thread, we don't report anyone for violations unless it comes across as a death threat, as this thread is for debate, NOT silencing the opposition.

I'm going to ask you Homodoxical to take your business elsewhere, as it's not appreciated here.

 

[GFR7]

I thought that we had an agreement via private mail :



(How soon the youngins forget).

You've been exposed as a fraud numerous times in this thread, I don't want to waste anymore time exposing you.

Thanks for your cooperation in this matter.

I had moved on. But when I saw you mentioning me and saying I was the other poster, and posting that on my own thread, I realized you felt I had to move on, but you didn't have to. If I am spoken about, I will respond. It's only fair. If you want me off your threads, stay off mine, and don't mention me or accuse me of sock puppetry.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

You know, aCW must be a former cop. There's no way anyone this dumb would be able to get a free market job. I guess "Welfare queen" would be equally as likely.

Welcome back Jr.; I was just looking at a few pictures of the March of the Moral Degenerates (Seattle Pride 2014) and noticed how many youth are involved.

I worry so much about you Jr., being that AIDS and such runs rampant amongst your age group.

 

[GFR7]

You know, aCW must be a former cop. There's no way anyone this dumb would be able to get a free market job. I guess "Welfare queen" would be equally as likely.

I have to admit, when he put something that arrogant in my PM inbox, the first thing I thought of was "retired cop". I have posted on tons of forums, and have never had anyone do anything remotely like this to me. It actually scared me.

 

[noguru]

By definition it's homosexual.

I was assuming the women were attracted to men as well, but the act itself is homosexual.

Though many men fantasize about the threesome with them included.

A man turned on by watching two women is a voyeur.

Anyone who watches and enjoys others having sex is a voyeur, this is not limited to hetero, homo, bisexual.

The attraction to two women stems from the man's desire to give and receive the masculine virtues of sex both. Thus seeing the woman being treated on by another woman, allows his brain to see himself as feminine receiving sexual attention.

No, I think you are wrong that such is the rule, though I cannot say it is not the case for some. I think you have neglected the possibility of the highlighted part above.

It's based on the same psychological reasoning that you never see yourself in your own dreams, and project yourself out onto the people who are in your dreams.

Oh yeah, and where do you get this from?

Or lose the opportunity to ever see sex and love as tied together as one. They become totally separated events in a person's life.

I agree. I have seen with many people since then that it becomes very difficult for them to feel real love after that.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I must have missed your answer somewhere in that rant Mr. Heterosexual as to whether or not you enjoy viewing two lesbians getting it on.

Please answer.

If it's two beautiful women then yes, I'm hardly repulsed at all, as I would be if it were two men.

Thanks for letting the world know Art that an act of homosexuality turns you on.

Quote:
You're absolutely right Art. Anyone that enjoys watching an act of homosexuality isn't a bisexual, he or she is a homosexual.

Thanks for the clarification.

You're a complete loon. One can only be a homosexual if you're attracted to your own gender engaged in sexual acts you nutcase...

We're not talking about viewing a heterosexual act Art, we're talking about a homosexual act where the participants are homosexual females.

Call it what you want, but I call anyone that gets excited about such a thing a freak.

 

[Arthur Brain]

I have to admit, when he put something that arrogant in my PM inbox, the first thing I thought of was "retired cop". I have posted on tons of forums, and have never had anyone do anything remotely like this to me. It actually scared me.

If he's a cop, retired or otherwise, then I'm the Sultan of Brunei...

lain:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I have to admit, when he put something that arrogant in my PM inbox, the first thing I thought of was "retired cop". I have posted on tons of forums, and have never had anyone do anything remotely like this to me. It actually scared me.

Do you need a change of panties GFR7?

 

[Christian Liberty]

Welcome back Jr.; I was just looking at a few pictures of the March of the Moral Degenerates (Seattle Pride 2014) and noticed how many youth are involved.

I worry so much about you Jr., being that AIDS and such runs rampant amongst your age group.

As far as I understand, HIV primarily spreads through sexual contact and through sharing needles. Since I have never done either of the above, I'm pretty sure I'm low risk.

And for what its worth, I was in the Adirondacks last week, I was not in Seattle.

I have to admit, when he put something that arrogant in my PM inbox, the first thing I thought of was "retired cop". I have posted on tons of forums, and have never had anyone do anything remotely like this to me. It actually scared me.

I'm mostly messing around because a bunch of people here have said that they think aCW is lying/bragging about being a retired cop. Seeing as I have a low opinion of police in general (I could share why in another thread, or in PM) I kind of find it a fun thing to use as an insult

 

[noguru]

For what its worth, as a heterosexual, I don't find the idea of two people of the same gender doing anything sexual to be attractive, even if its two women. Let's just leave it at that.

Would you think any polygamist figure in the Bible would not be heterosexual if he enjoyed 2 or more of his wives together?

 

[Christian Liberty]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I must have missed your answer somewhere in that rant Mr. Heterosexual as to whether or not you enjoy viewing two lesbians getting it on.

Please answer.



Thanks for letting the world know Art that an act of homosexuality turns you on.

Quote:
You're absolutely right Art. Anyone that enjoys watching an act of homosexuality isn't a bisexual, he or she is a homosexual.

Thanks for the clarification.



We're not talking about viewing a heterosexual act Art, we're talking about a homosexual act where the participants are homosexual females.

Call it what you want, but I call anyone that gets excited about such a thing a freak.

A freak? Maybe.

A homosexual? Not exactly.

If he's a cop, retired or otherwise, then I'm the Sultan of Brunei...

lain:

I beg to differ. I don't see being a cop as something to be proud of, but I do see it as a very logical explanation of WHY the individual in question is an authoritarian fascist.

His character is consistent with policing, and not consistent with any free market job. You know, jobs that people actually CHOOSE to pay for.

 

[noguru]

If he's a cop, retired or otherwise, then I'm the Sultan of Brunei...

lain:

If he ever was a police officer he was most likely fired when they realized how stupid he is. He was more likely a sanitation engineer at a public restroom (because he claims to have been involved with vice stings there) that was commonly used for homosexual encounters between men.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

It even seems that he [noguru] would be in agreement that homosexual behaviour
should be regulated by government and courts.

Since you're here noguru, perhaps you could respond to Naz's post about how you feel about the regulation of homosexual behavior by governments and courts (for you Libertarians out there, that means criminalizing it).
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3977666&postcount=804