Can you tell us why you aren't going off about this guy?
http://www.glaad.org/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/Josh%20DuggarFRC_0.png?itok=zbKKo5R8
It's his lover
Can you tell us why you aren't going off about this guy?
http://www.glaad.org/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/Josh%20DuggarFRC_0.png?itok=zbKKo5R8
It's his lover
Josh is a heterosexual
Can you tell us why you aren't going off about this guy?
The people following this 3 part thread learned about the cult that you identified with not too long ago (Libertarianism) in Part 2, and many including myself are wondering if you've flushed it and it's godless leaders down the proverbial toilet where it and they belong?
There are many people following this thread that haven't heard of your new cult, "thermometeronism",
perhaps you could share some details about it with us Jr.?
Nah. Talking to you is about the least productive thing I can do with my day.
You still need the gospel. If you want to talk about that, I will. Talking to you about anything else is pointless.
But we are talking about Josh Drugger, a Christian heterosexual who over the course of years molested many of his sisters and other girls. And by extension we are talking about his Christian heterosexual parents who knew about the abuse going on under their roof and did nothing to stop it and worked for years to cover it all up. And we are also talking about his Christian heterosexual parents who hypocritically spread false witness regarding gays and lesbians claiming that they were pedophiles while harboring a pedophile themselves.What's to talk about? A Christian did a terrible thing as a 15 year old boy and has asked Jesus Christ to forgive him.
Yeah the gay agenda that you claim was written in 1972 but didn't exist until the Family Research Council published it in 1991.Of course the LGBTQueer movement couldn't care less about the incident if it weren't for the fact that Josh Duggars worked for that evil Family Research Council (you've heard of them, you claim that they made up the 1972 gay agenda, which included in it's platform:
and you will keep trying to defend them and their perverted pedophile actions.I'm sure you homosexual activists will have fun thrusting your disease ridden daggers in and out of the Duggars family for as long as you can milk this story.
What should a youth mentor organization do that has a long history of homosexual leaders molesting little boys?
What's to talk about? A Christian did a terrible thing as a 15 year old boy and has asked Jesus Christ to forgive him.
But we are talking about Josh Drugger, a Christian heterosexual who over the course of years molested many of his sisters and other girls. And by extension we are talking about his Christian heterosexual parents...
who knew about the abuse going on under their roof and did nothing to stop it and worked for years to cover it all up.
And we are also talking about his Christian heterosexual parents...
who hypocritically spread false witness regarding gays and lesbians claiming that they were pedophiles while harboring a pedophile themselves.
Of course you don't care about Josh and his victims, after all they were girls making Josh a righteous heterosexual
Yeah the gay agenda that you claim was written in 1972 but didn't exist until the Family Research Council published it in 1991.
Bringing up the question: if there is such a thing as a "gay agenda" why do you have to rely on a fake agenda? why the lie Connnie?
and you will keep trying to defend them and their perverted pedophile actions.
I know you want this molester executed. You've said many times that should be the punishment for such a crime.
Which would wipe out about 98 percent of the LGBTQueer "community" shag.
Refer to that fact that Josh Duggars was a teen and the definition of pedophile.
You must at least be mad that the family tried to cover it up? His parents aren't teens after all.
what's wrong Connie? You've never had issues labeling 15 year olds before. WHy is your friend Josh different?Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
What's to talk about? A Christian did a terrible thing as a 15 year old boy and has asked Jesus Christ to forgive him.
(As opposed to Christian homosexual parents)
(As opposed to Christian homosexual parents...little Mattie Vines alert!).
I'm surprised that you don't even know what the definition of pedophile is TB (being a teen, Josh Duggars wasn't one).
an agenda that didn't exist until the FRC created itYep, that one (why are homosexual activists ashamed to admit that their political successes came from an agenda?).
Why do you want to defend your buddy Josh?Why do homosexuals want to murder Christians TracerBullet?
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Which would wipe out about 98 percent of the LGBTQueer "community" shag.
Refer to that fact that Josh Duggars was a teen and the definition of pedophile.
It's a 12 year old case where sexual immorality was a major problem with a 15 year old boy in a Christian family. I'm not going to waste my time reviewing what they should have done and allow the LGBTQueer movement to derail this thread.
That being said: If only you showed this much interest in adult homosexual pedophiles and pederasts Doper (who run rampant in the movement that you so adamantly defend).
what's wrong Connie?
You've never had issues labeling 15 year olds before.
WHy is your friend Josh different?
Sorry if this has been posted already: (have no time at present to go through all the posts)
Saw this and thought aCW would take it in the spirit in which it was intended (but not intended by Savage, tee hee ):
I would agree that this is just tit-for-tat for the LGBTQs. A piece of incredible luck for their campaign:
Dan Savage blasts Duggars for hypocrisy:
http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/davidbadash/watch_dan_savage_blasts_duggars
Didn't say it was objectively good. I said for their aims, for the lgbtq campaign, it is of course an incredible windfall that a Christian family would be booted off TLC and have such a scandal. Yes, of course they feed off such.Incredible luck? Like the pack of vultures that they are, they feed off good people's past misery's. How is that a good thing?
No, he's morally off-kilter but no hypocrite.If there is one thing that Dan Savage isn't, it's a hyprocrite (he's a proud moral degenerate and makes no apologies for being one).
Agreed, just as it was better in the 1950s to have strong families with secret adultery going on, than openly no-fault divorced people with cohabiting lovers. This is something ordinary people cannot seem to grasp :think: Yes, I understand where Huckabee is coming from on this....I'd rather have a politician propositioning in a bathroom than proposing policy that turns the whole country into a bathroom...