Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

alwight

New member
I pray to God that He won't "zap" you and other perverts before we can get this country turned around by once again legislating righteous laws and embracing decency in the way of cultural mores'.

But then, that's totally up to Him.
Thanks for all your prayers aCW, I really can't say how important that is to me.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
On that note: I feel like going out for a drive, and what better song to listen to then The Cars "Drive".

Listen to the words Al, GayForReal7, Art Brain and Tracerbullet.

"You can't go on, thinking nothing's wrong".


Rest in peace Benjamin Orr.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
(Kind of like what Al, GayForReal7, Art Brain and Balerion the Black are doing by not coming out as 'proud' homosexuals).

Probably because none of us are. I rather imagine that if any of us were homosexual we'd have no qualms in admitting it to you, I certainly wouldn't. What would you have to threaten any of us with? An ineffectual mammoth joke of a blog? You're a nobody. A puffed up self impressed windbag who inwardly probably realizes that he's powerless, and tries to cope with it by compensating with this ongoing personal project under the delusion it's actually making any difference.

You're a sad case man and you have zero credibility which you probably also realize.

Oh, and for anyone who went for option one where it came to how aCW would deflect away from a public apology to GFR7 for his atrocious comments about his family then well done.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
One of the many scare-mongering tactics that homosexualists use is that if you recriminalize things like homosexuality, abortion and pornography you'll have a...

300px-No_Theocracy_San_Francisco2.jpg


This topic has been brought up several times in this 3 part thread and the questions that I ask each and every time is:

What does legislating righteous laws that control immoral behavior have to do with mandating a state religion?

Was the United States considered a theocracy prior to the decriminalization of abortion and homosexuality circa 1973?

Here is another question for those that use the scare-mongering theocracy tactic :

Are the US States that still have homosexual statutes on their books "theocratic states"?

The things I think about while driving.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
One of the many scare-mongering tactics that homosexualists use is that if you recriminalize things like homosexuality, abortion and pornography you'll have a...

300px-No_Theocracy_San_Francisco2.jpg


This topic has been brought up several times in this 3 part thread and the questions that I ask each and every time is:

What does legislating righteous laws that control immoral behavior have to do with mandating a state religion?

Was the United States considered a theocracy prior to the decriminalization of abortion and homosexuality circa 1973?

Here is another question for those that use the scare-mongering theocracy tactic :

Are the US States that still have homosexual statutes on their books "theocratic states"?

The things I think about while driving.

I'd just focus on the road if I were you...

:plain:
 

GFR7

New member
One of the many scare-mongering tactics that homosexualists use is that if you recriminalize things like homosexuality, abortion and pornography you'll have a...

300px-No_Theocracy_San_Francisco2.jpg


This topic has been brought up several times in this 3 part thread and the questions that I ask each and every time is:

What does legislating righteous laws that control immoral behavior have to do with mandating a state religion?

Was the United States considered a theocracy prior to the decriminalization of abortion and homosexuality circa 1973?

Here is another question for those that use the scare-mongering theocracy tactic :

Are the US States that still have homosexual statutes on their books "theocratic states"?

The things I think about while driving.


Well, I hope you weren't driving under the influence....... :think:

I will spell this out for the last time:
:plain:

Preamble:

When, in the course of human events.....it became necessary for feminists, gays, and liberals......

to dissolve the political bands which connected them to conservatives and Christians.........and to assume among the powers of the earth.... the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God [though this be now the God of Wicca and not of our Forefathers] entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

SAID THEY: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that we are equal......

HEREAFTER.....so much progress.......and change of public opinion....... has been allowed to grow, incrementally and exponentially.....for decades.............

and even those US states who still have criminal statues banning homosexuality were allowed to be federally negated in 2003 in Lawrence v Texas when the Supreme Court of the United States found we have a constitutional right to sodomy.....to suddenly say,

"Let us return to our former, righteous ways"........

when thou knowest as well as I, Brother aCW,

that to these Liberralles who dwell in our midst that this word now denote nothing.....

and that they speaketh in that strange Wiccan Tounge of things "Equal" and of "Holy Sodomie"..........

Therefore, my Christian Brother, you and Scott Lively and Mr. LaBarbera, Do worketh in vain toward this Recriminalization.


photo01-revolution.jpg
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Probably because none of us are. I rather imagine that if any of us were homosexual we'd have no qualms in admitting it to you, I certainly wouldn't. What would you have to threaten any of us with? An ineffectual mammoth joke of a blog? You're a nobody. A puffed up self impressed windbag who inwardly probably realizes that he's powerless, and tries to cope with it by compensating with this ongoing personal project under the delusion it's actually making any difference.

You're a sad case man and you have zero credibility which you probably also realize.

Oh, and for anyone who went for option one where it came to how aCW would deflect away from a public apology to GFR7 for his atrocious comments about his family then well done.

Every time I read one of your posts now Art, I can't help but think of the 'gimp' in the movie 'Pulp Fiction'.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4036794&postcount=1957

pulp_fiction3380.jpg


Do you wear that to pride parades or save it for that 'special someone'?
 
Last edited:

TracerBullet

New member
Thank you for your valuable input Traci. The work of Dr. Judith Reisman and her credentials are covered quite extensively in Part 1. Here are just 3 of the posts that you'll soon see again:

Alfred Kinsey, page 77, post #1142

Video: The Kinsey Syndrome, page 77, post #1152

"ALFRED KINSEY – THE LEFT’S PERVERT HERO" (Don Feder article), page 78, post #1158


Since I'm going to do a review of earlier posts from Part 1 and 2, I'll once again show what kind of sick degenerate that homosexual/child molester Alfred Kinsey was.

In the meantime, so that we can pacify homoseuxalist TracerBullet, I think we should all add Dr. Judith Reisman to the long list of LIAR! LIAR! PANTS ON FIRE! that represent those who believe in God and His Word when it comes to human sexuality.

and ignore God's commandment about false witness
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
One of the many scare-mongering tactics that homosexualists use is that if you recriminalize things like homosexuality, abortion and pornography you'll have a...

[theocracy].

This topic has been brought up several times in this 3 part thread and the questions that I ask each and every time is:

What does legislating righteous laws that control immoral behavior have to do with mandating a state religion?

Was the United States considered a theocracy prior to the decriminalization of abortion and homosexuality circa 1973?

Here is another question for those that use the scare-mongering theocracy tactic :

Are the US States that still have homosexual statutes on their books "theocratic states"?...



...I will spell this out for the last time:
:plain:

Preamble:

When, in the course of human events.....it became necessary for feminists, gays, and liberals......

to dissolve the political bands which connected them to conservatives and Christians.........and to assume among the powers of the earth.... the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God [though this be now the God of Wicca and not of our Forefathers] entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

SAID THEY: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that we are equal......

HEREAFTER.....so much progress.......and change of public opinion....... has been allowed to grow, incrementally and exponentially.....for decades.............

and even those US states who still have criminal statues banning homosexuality were allowed to be federally negated in 2003 in Lawrence v Texas when the Supreme Court of the United States found we have a constitutional right to sodomy.....to suddenly say,

"Let us return to our former, righteous ways"........

when thou knowest as well as I, Brother aCW,

that to these Liberralles who dwell in our midst that this word now denote nothing.....

and that they speaketh in that strange Wiccan Tounge of things "Equal" and of "Holy Sodomie"..........

Therefore, my Christian Brother, you and Scott Lively and Mr. LaBarbera, Do worketh in vain toward this Recriminalization.

Wow, the things one writes while hiiiiiiigh on methamphetamines.

Nice try GayForReal7, but your use of the word "theocracy" has nothing to do with the Declaration of Independence and has everything to do with attempting to scare people into believing that in order to legislate righteous laws, we first have to have someone like the Ayatollah (of rocknrolla) running this country.

Ayatolla-Khomeini-225x300.jpg.html
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Every time I read one of your posts now Art, I can't help but think of the 'gimp' in the movie 'Pulp Fiction'.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4036794&postcount=1957

Do you wear that to pride parades or save it for that 'special someone'?

Well, that pretty much just goes to show how much of a lurid imagination you've got then eh? Why you link to an earlier post that was just you acting like a silly little git along the same theme I'm not quite sure. You really would be better off going back to those quaint ole 'Ovaltine' & 'mothers basement' "gags".

In any event, your reticence to address your pathetic personal remarks which were inexcusable reduces anything you have to say obsolete.

Oh, you didn't understand the latter? I know how much TH confused you with erudite language and logic after all. Maybe this will help:

Soz guv, sum of us ain't gay an even know tha it's outa bounds ta be so much of a prick ta even thunk abut usin personal stuff yeh? Wen u gonna git aroun ta apologizin for ya crappy crud throuart this thrad?
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Every time I read one of your posts now Art, I can't help but think of the 'gimp' in the movie 'Pulp Fiction'.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4036794&postcount=1957

Do you wear that to pride parades or save it for that 'special someone'?

Well, that pretty much just goes to show how much of a lurid imagination you've got then eh? Why you link to an earlier post that was just you acting like a silly little git along the same theme I'm not quite sure. You really would be better off going back to those quaint ole 'Ovaltine' & 'mothers basement' "gags".

In any event, your reticence to address your pathetic personal remarks which were inexcusable reduces anything you have to say obsolete.

Oh, you didn't understand the latter? I know how much TH confused you with erudite language and logic after all. Maybe this will help:

Soz guv, sum of us ain't gay an even know tha it's outa bounds ta be so much of a prick ta even thunk abut usin personal stuff yeh? Wen u gonna git aroun ta apologizin for ya crappy crud throuart this thrad?

Because of GayForReal7's obvious substance abuse problem, I was reading various articles about how homosexuals disproportionately use and abuse alcohol and drugs (like this one from the CDC: http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/substance-abuse.htm ) and ran across this 7 year old article by Americans For Truth About Homosexuality's Peter LaBarbera that you and others your age might want to pay very close attention to:

Why Are So Many Mid-Life “Gay” Men Getting HIV?

Monday, March 19th, 2007

More on that “healthy” “gay” lifestyle…the one that our schools are promoting to our children…

Excerpted from Why Are So Many Mid-Life Gay Men Getting HIV?, by Spencer Cox and Bruce Kellerhouse, PhD, published Mar 15, 2007, by the pro-homosexuality Gay City News:

New data released by the city’s department of health show that the highest rates of new HIV infections are among gay men 35 to 49 years old. These findings are alarming and, to some, perplexing.

Why are so many mid-life gay men who were able to avoid HIV infection for so long now taking risks that are exposing them to the disease?

We believe that one common thread runs through most of these men’s life histories – they came out and/or lived during the death-saturated culture of the 1980s and early to mid-1990s.

Mid-life gay men have lived most of their adult lives during the worst of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, experiencing the loss of partners, friends, and people in their community…

By 1988, gay men had already on average lost six lovers, friends, and/or family members…

Many health problems that are now common among gay men are made worse by loneliness and lack of social opportunities…

Furthermore, gay men have high levels of depression and anxiety disorders, another characteristic of people who have survived trauma. Studies estimate that gay men have about twice the levels of depression than are found in Americans generally. Depression is strongly linked to high-risk behavior, including drug use, alcoholism, and risky sex.

The methamphetamine epidemic that has swept through urban gay communities also contributes to high levels of new HIV infections. A recent study from the Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center, which offers HIV testing, found that one in three new HIV-positive tests was associated with meth use. About one in 10 gay men in New York City report recent meth use.

In some ways, gay men in mid-life are at the center of a “perfect storm,” in which multiple problems converge to create a very high-risk environment…

http://americansfortruth.com/issues...t-groups/gay-culture/crystal-methamphetamine/

Granted, young homosexual males between the ages of 13 and 24 are disproportionately contracting HIV/AIDS, but that doesn't mean that you older sodomites can't as well.

Remember to "get tested" Art and...

letz be kerful out ther.


402871073_9c29bf9e45_o.jpg
 

GFR7

New member
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
One of the many scare-mongering tactics that homosexualists use is that if you recriminalize things like homosexuality, abortion and pornography you'll have a...

[theocracy].

This topic has been brought up several times in this 3 part thread and the questions that I ask each and every time is:

What does legislating righteous laws that control immoral behavior have to do with mandating a state religion?

Was the United States considered a theocracy prior to the decriminalization of abortion and homosexuality circa 1973?

Here is another question for those that use the scare-mongering theocracy tactic :

Are the US States that still have homosexual statutes on their books "theocratic states"?...



Wow, the things one writes while hiiiiiiigh on methamphetamines.

Nice try GayForReal7, but your use of the word "theocracy" has nothing to do with the Declaration of Independence and has everything to do with attempting to scare people into believing that in order to legislate righteous laws, we first have to have someone like the Ayatollah (of rocknrolla) running this country.

Ayatolla-Khomeini-225x300.jpg.html
I was only using the preamble as a literary template, idiot. :D

You're too thick to get the points.

IF it were possible to go back to righteous laws, dummy, I am sure YOU, Lively, et al, would have made sure to do so BEFORE Lawrence v TX made sodomy legal in all 50 states and the same sex marriage movement got federal backing from dozens of judges and DOMA was struck down and anti-hate laws were passed and Christian bakers and hotels were sued -Right??????????

Oh, by the way, I have no substance abuse problem, and never have had.

antoine_dodson_you_are_so_dumb-14245.gif
 
Last edited:

alwight

New member
Because of GayForReal7's obvious substance abuse problem, I was reading various articles about how homosexuals disproportionately use and abuse alcohol and drugs (like this one from the CDC: http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/substance-abuse.htm ) and ran across this 7 year old article by Americans For Truth About Homosexuality's Peter LaBarbera that you and others your age might want to pay very close attention to:
The hypocrisy here is pretty overwhelming aCW. If you really do have health concerns and that is your real anti-gay motivation then fair enough let's discuss such issues.
Can they perhaps be addressed, how representative are they, or are they even as particularly clear cut as some people might try to suppose?
But no, that isn't actually yours or "Americans For Truth About Homosexuality" real motivation at all. This is really about one particularly self righteous group refusing to tolerate a different group, with a different lifestyle, and using any convenient stick that happens to come to hand.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Because of GayForReal7's obvious substance abuse problem, I was reading various articles about how homosexuals disproportionately use and abuse alcohol and drugs (like this one from the CDC: http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/substance-abuse.htm ) and ran across this 7 year old article by Americans For Truth About Homosexuality's Peter LaBarbera that you and others your age might want to pay very close attention to:


The hypocrisy here is pretty overwhelming aCW. If you really do have health concerns and that is your real anti-gay motivation then fair enough let's discuss such issues.
Can they perhaps be addressed, how representative are they, or are they even as particularly clear cut as some people might try to suppose?
But no, that isn't actually yours or "Americans For Truth About Homosexuality" real motivation at all. This is really about one particularly self righteous group refusing to tolerate a different group, with a different lifestyle, and using any convenient stick that happens to come to hand.

Those who engage in homosexual behavior and the (as you call it) "health concerns" that goes along with it is only part of the reason why homosexuality MUST be recriminalized Al.

Note how The Centers for Disease Control, the United State's premier health organization, doesn't even talk about how abstaining from homosex will save lives, but instead talks about how homophobia often times is the cause of substance abuse amongst those who engage in homosex (from my above link) :

Substance Abuse

Studies have shown that, when compared with the general population, gay and bisexual men, lesbian, and transgender individuals are more likely to:
•Use alcohol and drugs
•Have higher rates of substance abuse
•Are less likely to abstain from alcohol and drug use
•Are more likely to continue heavy drinking into later life[1]

Alcohol and drug use among some men who have sex with men (MSM) can be a reaction to homophobia, discrimination, or violence they experienced due to their sexual orientation and can contribute to other mental health problems.

http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/substance-abuse.htm

Yet another case of an institution (government) that was ordained by God to "do good", taking the side of evil.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
1-a-reminder_note-300x256.png


As I've mentioned numerous times before: This 3 part thread is not about those individuals who are struggling with homosexual desires and behavior (although there are numerous posts that talk about asking Christ into your life so that He can help wash away those desires), it's about those that have given into this sexual sin and are promoting it through an extremely well financed and politically backed agenda.
 

TracerBullet

New member
1-a-reminder_note-300x256.png


As I've mentioned numerous times before: This 3 part thread is not about those individuals who are struggling with homosexual desires and behavior (although there are numerous posts that talk about asking Christ into your life so that He can help wash away those desires), it's about those that have given into this sexual sin and are promoting it through an extremely well financed and politically backed agenda.

no this thread was about promoting homophobia, hate and discrimination through false witness and propaganda
 

GFR7

New member
1-a-reminder_note-300x256.png


As I've mentioned numerous times before: This 3 part thread is not about those individuals who are struggling with homosexual desires and behavior (although there are numerous posts that talk about asking Christ into your life so that He can help wash away those desires), it's about those that have given into this sexual sin and are promoting it through an extremely well financed and politically backed agenda.

1. Of all those whom you (falsely) label as gay, substance abusers, corruptors, etc. - I alone have consistently supported the idea that a well funded campaign needs to be dismantled . And yet your delusions about me remain.

2. What is this evidence/proof you have of my substance abuse? Thankfully, I have lived absolutely free of drugs and of any alcohol dependence.

3. You do realize at some future point you are going to have to meet all of us in person at some TOL conference(me, Alwight, Arthur, and the others) and look us in the eye, when we are with our spouses/sons/families and repeat these accusations? :think: I think you will look like a fool and act like a real coward. :chuckle:

and in fact, if you met my son, and told him that he and I never suffered our tragic loss in 2006, and that I am gay and a truckstop trick and addicted to meth, he'd punch you in the face. ;) Guarenteed. :D

Oh, and I wonder why I am posting the latest by Van Maren about the brutal disease and effects of the sexual revolution? (if I love it so much - NOT) :think:
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=104158
 
Last edited:

alwight

New member
Those who engage in homosexual behavior and the (as you call it) "health concerns" that goes along with it is only part of the reason why homosexuality MUST be recriminalized Al.
Then let's have some honesty here aCW, neither you nor "Americans For Truth About Homosexuality" actually gives a damn about the health of active homosexuals, quite the opposite perhaps, except in how gay health issues might be used to suit your bigoted agenda.
You even use your "God" in a remarkably similar insincere manner, as a handy convenience in your hate crusade.
 

GFR7

New member
Then let's have some honesty here aCW, neither you nor "Americans For Truth About Homosexuality" actually gives a damn about the health of active homosexuals, quite the opposite perhaps, except in how gay health issues might be used to suit your bigoted agenda.
You even use your "God" in a remarkably similar insincere manner, as a handy convenience in your hate crusade.
And one wonders: If medical technology/culture advance to the point of containing/negating many or most of the health problems, will aCW suddenly say that being gay is OK? And if not, then why use the medical argument in the first place? :think:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top