It's devastating isn't it?
lain:
Quite so. We should discuss this at our next meeting.
Who Posted?
- Thread starter chrysostom
- Start date
Quite so. We should discuss this at our next meeting.
No thanks - I'm quite happy stomping around in here.
Post one and we'll discuss it.
Post one and we'll discuss it.
It's as though Oscar Wilde had returned from the grave...with the commensurate deterioration.
Or more likely "The Picture of Dorian Grey"!:dead:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Surely the one that was deleted couldn't have been that insulting, after all wouldn't be evil speaking and malicious?
:think:
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Oh, it was very insulting. And now it's gone.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well then, that would seem case closed. After all, why would it be deleted if it was okay to keep on the thread?
I wonder what SOD will have to say....
What's the betting it'll be either *crickets* or some other complete non answer?
Anybody?
One single post of mine to discuss?
Rusha?
anna?
tardlyartie?
One single post of mine to discuss?
Rusha?
anna?
tardlyartie?
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
anna?
One single post of mine?
throw it up and we'll discuss it
One single post of mine?
throw it up and we'll discuss it
That was about as hard to figure as who did it in a Columbo episode.
lain:suddenly it's gotten awfully quiet in here
Nice and peaceful with all the clamorous bitter and angry posters gone
Much like it was in here last week before the butthurt sulker returned :chuckle:
Someone needs attention ....
Someone needs attention ....
What Koban really means to say is ....
Someone needs attention ....
No thanks - I'm quite happy stomping around in here.
Post one and we'll discuss it.
Post one and we'll discuss it.
What Koban really means to say is ....
koban said:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
The one that was deleted and landed you an infraction. Why were you given one for that SOD? Your gossip posts and snide comments are plastered all over this thread. Your 'tardly' insult nonsense even.Your current latest indirect snipe at TH would also serve easily enough. That whole kind of stuff is the antithesis of your sig and you do it in spades, hence your hypocrisy, further compounded by your reluctance to own up to it.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
The one which got you an infraction on Jan 23rd for being unnecessarily disruptive and is still in the woodshed. How about you address that? I'm not going to link to it as it's been deleted on this thread (with good reason)
Asides from that the post where you refer to TH on here as a 'butthurt' sulker' a handful of posts ago would also go completely against your sig.
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Here's another one for you SOD
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3346505&postcount=144
The relevant portion being:
I see our friend who likes to pretend he's a lawyer has been clamoring for the attention he's so dearly missed since he sulked off butthurt and has been yammering on about consent again, so let's revisit:
TH's credentials as a lawyer have been verified already, Further, he's challenged you on it if you were willing to put your money where your gob is. So either you're deliberately lying or accusing him without foundation, none of which would be applicable to your sig. The same with the 'sulked off butthurt' garbage but just address your misrepresentation for the time being.
:thumb:
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3346505&postcount=144
The relevant portion being:
I see our friend who likes to pretend he's a lawyer has been clamoring for the attention he's so dearly missed since he sulked off butthurt and has been yammering on about consent again, so let's revisit:
TH's credentials as a lawyer have been verified already, Further, he's challenged you on it if you were willing to put your money where your gob is. So either you're deliberately lying or accusing him without foundation, none of which would be applicable to your sig. The same with the 'sulked off butthurt' garbage but just address your misrepresentation for the time being.
:thumb:
annabenedetti said:
One artie.
Just one.
From this thread.
Post it up here and we'll discuss it.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
You've just been given examples. I could care less whether the last one came from this thread or not as it's a prime example of your deliberate slander as it is. The one in the woodshed came from this thread and is still up there for why you received an infraction. So stop trying to squirm around the issue and start 'discussing'.
Or do the expected and don't take account for your own vile words and hypocrisy.