That's an interesting generalization in need of particulars. Paint the picture, let's look at it.
Being a white male conservative is being a person who has been made fun of in the media and whose virtues have been dragged through the mud. They have been treated like crap, to be frank, and denying it just adds insult to injury- these people were not at these rallies out of hate, they were there out of frustration.
The problem with that objection, the notion that you're somehow participating in an immoral act by virtue of providing a cake, is that I'm going to bet my bottom dollar there's no questionaire by the cake maker regarding whether or not the couple who wants it are being married in a Christian church (my understanding being that so far it's been a Christian objection). It's as hypocritical and under thought as the objection to gay marriage was from our community when atheists, Hindus and every other heterosexual couple who wanted to marry were married without moral objection from anyone.
Discrimination would be turning them to the door when they walked in because they are gay.
That is what we made the law for in the first place. Not to bully someone into doing something against reasonable convictions and beliefs.
It's not a fact, it's an opinion offered as one.
They got by with their 'concern' by brainwashing white people into thinking we are offing them in a disproportionate amount than they are us, even though the statistics tell a completely opposite story.
Honestly, I didn't even know the statistic at first, and I've always been against BLM- so go figure
But they know the statistic, and still chose to do as they did.
That's what burns me up with not just racial, but also sexual agendas.
The headline reads:
"We can still be right when we are wrong, because a long time ago we suffered iniquity"