You seem to be forgetting A) that how popular an idea, concept, or statement is, has no bearing on it's validity, and B) the source of information has no bearing on it's validity.
In other words...
You're getting to be so good at using logical fallacies that you've started combining them.
I don't know whether to be impressed or saddened.
You shouldn't actually be either but just embarrassed.
Conservapedia is a joke because it starts off with an agenda, hence why I used a fairly neutral subject such as music. That led to Delius and the laughable entry in Conservapedia as opposed to Wiki. Conservapedia's lack of anything resembling salient facts beyond the obvious is just appalling whereas Wiki goes into abject detail. Compare the articles on here.
Conservapedia is a joke, it just is.