Einsteinian theories of space-time continuums or dimensions are not necessarily true, especially dealing with issues before material creation.
The fact that matter and space and time cannot exist independently from one another
within the Creation is not exactly something which is up to debate. If it is please illustrate how this could be. The fact that we are dealing with issues before the material Creation is entirely my point. It is also a fact that
words mean things when the word "time" is used
it means something within the Creation. Whatever
things (for lack of a better term) exist beyond the Creation do not fit into any common frame of reference which we have. If what exists in eternity does not fit our definition/concept/ understanding of 'time" then it isn't exactly what we mean when we say "time"....is it?

lain:
You are wrongly assuming that time is a created 'thing' rather than a concept of duration/sequence/succession which the triune God experienced in His relations even before material creation.
If you are referring to Kant's view of "time" then in this frame of reference (BTW you asserting that Kant is correct does not make it so any more than I asserting the Platonic/Aristotelian view is correct) the details of my argument may shift but the basic premise does not. If 'time" is nothing more than an experienced concept then what is required is the tools necessary to experience it (space & matter) if these do not exist within the Creation than there is nothing on which to base the experience on. The construct falls apart. The fact still remains though that if the ALMIGHTY experiences what HE considers to be a concept called "time" by HIS reference it differs so
dramatically from our experience of "time" that the two cannot be one in the same. :nono:
In the beginning refers to the beginning of our universe and our unique MEASURE of time (which should not be confused with time itself).
If what we are experiencing is not time then we had
best develop another name for an experience which is defined by duration, experienced linearly, along a successive series of moments. Myself personally, I prefer the Biblical view that the Creation exists within/experiences time while the ALMIGHTY exists in Eternity and can impact upon time at will. The alternative is to (in my view) reclassify Eternity as an endless series of moments (which I do not consider to be Biblical....perhaps you can tell me how it could be so). :think:
You are simply reading an assumption into the text that time was created in the beginning with everything else.

lain: Not necessarily so...and yes I am aware that I said/indicated that time was Created....there is a
possibility that it was an result of the act of Creation. Much like for good to exist within the Framework of free choice the potential for evil must as well....IOW if good exists Evil can. It is a possibility that Time is a result of the Creation....not a positive act.
There was a before and after creation for the eternal God, so there is divine temporality from eternity past to eternity future.
Very good....now define this temporality. If it matches what we experience as "Time" then we should call it so......but I doubt it will.
Only the present is real for God and us (presentism) vs God experiencing eternal now simultaneity (eternalism).
:e4e: I happen to be an eternalist.....damn glad to meet you. Perhaps you can convince me that I am mistaken?