Cruciform
New member
Actually, it rests upon both.Just wanted to add, the catholicity of the church does not depend on the papacy, but the Gospel.
Actually, it rests upon both.Just wanted to add, the catholicity of the church does not depend on the papacy, but the Gospel.
:nono: Your human-decision to endorse your favored church rendition.Rather, the authoritative teachings of Christ's one historic Church, as opposed to the mere opinions of your favored recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect.
I did. That's just the way you "came across" to me.
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
The Catholic Church either is or is not that one historic Church founded by Jesus Christ himself, thus possessing the very same doctrinal authority as its founder. Likewise regarding your preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect.:nono: Your human-decision to endorse your favored church rendition.
Your insistence on utterly missing my point---and thus merely proving it---is noted.True. In the exact same fashion I did as well. Glad we are on the same page.
Absolutely true. :up:"The belief in the Bible as the sole source of faith is unhistorical, illogical, fatal to the virtue of faith, and destructive of unity." -The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume XIII, "Protestantism", Section III A - Sola Scriptura ("Bible Alone")
See this....to destroy as much of the Waldensean literature as possible.
Try again. :yawn:(Fox's Book Of Martyrs)
The Catholic Church either is or is not that one historic Church founded by Jesus Christ himself, thus possessing the very same doctrinal authority as its founder. Likewise regarding your preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect.
Your insistence on utterly missing my point---and thus merely proving it---is noted.
Sure.Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
Hardly. What matters is the objective nature of what we've chosen. Back to Post #464.Regardless, it 'your' preferred church. Somehow, that you 'choose' it and I mine eludes you.
Basically, the RCC is full of rhetoric, not objective truth.Hardly. What matters is the objective nature of what we've chosen. Back to Post #464.
Basically, the RCC is full of rhetoric, not objective truth.
The Roman machine continues to twist history in an effort to convince themselves and others that they are the one true church.
The one, holy, catholic and apostolic church embodies those Christians who hear the voice of Christ and follow Him, over and above false teachers.
The Roman machine continues to twist history in an effort to convince themselves and others that they are the one true church.
For example...?Basically, the RCC is full of rhetoric, not objective truth.
For example...?The Roman machine continues to twist history in an effort to convince themselves and others that they are the one true church.
Proof, please.The one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church embodies those Christians who hear the voice of Christ and follow Him, over and above false teachers.
Actually, it rests upon both.
The Gospel mentions nothing about a papacy.
Still waiting for you to provide the information requested in Post #472 above.I am grateful to be counted as a true believer in God's one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church.
Surely you won't believe proof that I post, as I don't believe those you post.Still waiting for you to provide the information requested in Post #472 above.
You chose it. We both used pretty much the same objectivity and subjectivity in choosing our man-preferred rendition. 1) God's sovereignty over that choice 2) which embraces the central truths of scripture without confusion 3) our motives and reason for choosing our church preference, etc. Both objective and subjective reasons are employed for choosing what we preferred. The overall reason there are Protestant and Catholic churches is beyond us and in God's hands. We chose what was available based on our expectations and preferences. Rather than asserting the superiority of your choice, realize it was 'your' choice. After that you can knock yourself out with why 'you' chose it, subjectively and objectively.Hardly. What matters is the objective nature of what we've chosen. Back to Post #464.
Lon, this is right on.You chose it. We both used pretty much the same objectivity and subjectivity in choosing our man-preferred rendition. 1) God's sovereignty over that choice 2) which embraces the central truths of scripture without confusion 3) our motives and reason for choosing our church preference, etc. Both objective and subjective reasons are employed for choosing what we preferred. The overall reason there are Protestant and Catholic churches is beyond us and in God's hands. We chose what was available based on our expectations and preferences. Rather than asserting the superiority of your choice, realize it was 'your' choice. After that you can knock yourself out with why 'you' chose it, subjectively and objectively.
As far as it being the 'only' choice in your mind, such doesn't not come from outside looking in. We stand on perception of truth and make that call, but the superior peak idea is to be held suspect.
-Lon