Not sure why?
You're not being honest
It was you that brought up my name:
"and for tet...."????
:think: "and for tet...."
ECT What is the true root objection to MAD?
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
Not sure why?
You're not being honest
It was you that brought up my name:
"and for tet...."????
:think: "and for tet...."
Show us the scripture where and/or when the Gospel of Christ stopped going to the Jew first as per Rom 1:16?
Did I? I honestly don't recall asking.
Right Divider
Body part
Typical response from someone that thinks that they are smart.... but are not.
Typical response from someone that thinks that they are smart.... but are not.
Yet another post from another MADist who cannot show with scripture when the Gospel of Christ stopped going to the Jew first.
My point was that Jesus had to die in order to remarry Israel. Since Israel was divorced from God, according to Duet, it would have been an abomination for God to remarry Israel because she (Israel) had committed adultery.
The wife was bound to the husband until death.
That is why the Disciple were not permitted to preach to the Samaritans and Gentiles before the death of Jesus, but after the death of Jesus they were told to go amongst the Samaritans and Gentiles.
The Samaritans and Gentiles were the descendants of the House of Israel.
It's how the House of Israel was joined with the House of Judah. It's how the NC was made to both houses.
Right Divider
Body part
I know you are, but what am I.
Tet, you are an annoying little pest that just comes here to annoy people. If you can't understand that Paul was talking about the PAST in Romans 1-3 .. when God CHOSE Israel, too bad for you.
heir
TOL Subscriber
off ignore to address and then back on
I'll ask that you please stop dropping my name from henceforth and I will refrain the same.
Oh yes, I am. You drop my name when you see that I am in a thread yet know I have had you on ignore for some time. I see it in posts where others have quoted you. At some point I feel the need to reply because you drag my name all over the place. So tonight, I took you off of ignore for a minute.
I put your name in there knowing that you are always fishing about the "Jew first" (how many times in this thread alone?) and always go on about how no one ever answers you about it even though I know that STP has, Nick M has and I have, but not to your satisfaction (you can't get no).
I'll ask that you please stop dropping my name from henceforth and I will refrain the same.
So you don't know when the first marriage took place, and you don't know when the remarriage took place?
Do you know if that first marriage had two brides, or just one?
I said that no MADist has shown with scripture when the Gospel of Christ stopped going to the Jew first as per Rom 1:16.
STP gave an answer when I first asked the question many weeks ago. He said Paul stopped going to the Jew first when a remnant of Jews was gathered.
You gave the same answer.
However, there is no scripture that supports this answer.
Neither of you have shown any scripture that says Paul stopped going to the Jew first when a Jewish remnant was formed.
In fact, there is no scripture from Paul about Paul gathering a Jewish remnant.
As long as you continue to parrot the false teachings of Darby, I will continue to reply, and show they are wrong.
If you can't handle Darby's false teachings being challenged, then put me on ignore.
Rom 1:16 says the Gospel of Christ was preached to the Jew first.
This has nothing to do with OT Israel being the chosen nation of God.
(Isaiah 54:5) For your Maker is your husband—
the Lord Almighty is his name—...
Two
(Jer 3:8) I gave faithless Israel her certificate of divorce and sent her away because of all her adulteries. Yet I saw that her unfaithful sister Judah had no fear; she also went out and committed adultery.
(2 Cor 11:2) For I am jealous for you with godly jealousy. For I have betrothed you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.
The bride became as a virgin once again.
heir
TOL Subscriber
I quote from the pure and preserved words of the Lord in the KJB not "Darby".
I heard you were a nice guy, but I see not a gentleman as request denied. Back on ignore you go. :kiss:
Darby's false teachings can be proven wrong with a KJB, and/or any Bible that exists.
Anybody can do what you do.
Example:
Judas hung himself (Matt 27:5 KJV), go and do likewise (Luke 10:37 KJV)
Throwing KJV quotes in between your Darby propaganda doesn't make it any more valid, then what I did above.