No, you have not represented me correctly.
First, your sentence has a double negative, so I’m not entirely sure what you intended to say. But if you meant that I deny God knows anything about future events, then no, that is not correct.
I believe God knows future events that are settled, determined, promised, declared, intended, or otherwise knowable.
What I deny is that every future free act already exists as a settled fact before it happens.
You keep treating that denial as a denial of omniscience, but that only works if you first define omniscience as exhaustive settled foreknowledge of every future free act. That is the very point under dispute.
So no, you have not represented Open Theism correctly. You are conflating “God knows the future” with “every future free act is already settled.” Open Theism affirms the former and denies the latter.
