Cross Reference
New member
Which church?
There's more than one?
A for the tongues thing, didn't you see this post..............
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4250432&postcount=1382
Thank you. No I didn't. [I took the liberty to correct your 1 Cor passage reference to mean 1 Cor 14 and not 15.]
In 1Cor 14:21-22 Paul says.... In the law it is written: "With men of other tongues and other lips I will speak to this people; And yet, for all that, they will not hear Me," says the Lord. Therefore tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers.
Tongues are not for the intellectually religious self assured but for the broken and contrite of heart who realize they are a needy people desperate to know the love of God.
It is a reference to Isaiah 28:11-12 For with stammering lips and another tongue He will speak to this people, To whom He said, "This is the rest with which You may cause the weary to rest," And, "This is the refreshing"; Yet they would not hear. where the people refused to receive instruction from the Lord, and so they would go back to the basics.
Again, they would not hear because of their unwillingness to live unto God.
And so the sign is negative to those who do not believe. The people rejected the word of the Lord, and so they were forced to listen to gentiles who were ruling over them speaking in foreign languages. They refused to listen to God, and were unable to understand the tongues of the gentiles, and this was a sign that the word of God spoken against them had come true. They refused to listen to God (unbelievers) and couldn't understand the foreign tongues.
The idea is to not speak in tongues publicly without there being an interpretation, otherwise the tongue will only be negative to those who are unbelievers, rather than being edified. God is still speaking to people, he hasn't given them up.
I can't agree that that is a correct understanding of the situation since Isa 28:13 gives the afterwards of their rejection.
Apparently you have never been in a meeting where no interpreter was present when one, by the overwhelming presence of God, brought a message in an unknown tongue to have it interpreted by a newly gifted interpreter. . .