Trump will be reelected

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Facebook algorithms will pick up on certain words and automatically ban people. Twitter too.

it's been a learning curve - used to be I only participated on hobby groups where discussion of politics was forbidden - lately though I've been participating on retarded "Fourth-wave feminism" groups.

they don't like it when it's pointed out that they're retarded :chuckle:
 

Trump Gurl

Credo in Unum Deum
it's been a learning curve - used to be I only participated on hobby groups where discussion of politics was forbidden - lately though I've been participating on retarded "Fourth-wave feminism" groups.

they don't like it when it's pointed out that they're retarded :chuckle:


Yes, you have to be careful. No free speech there.

Luckily Trump does not have the problem that us little folks have. Maybe he will start his own Twitter-like company after he leaves office. That would be cool.
 

Trump Gurl

Credo in Unum Deum
Liberals are now starting to think Donald Trump will win once more
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...-win-once-more

Liberals are starting to turn on one another across the campaign trail as it becomes increasingly clear that President Trump is now cruising toward reelection this fall. Four years ago, most liberals treated the prospect of his presidency as simply a punchline instead of a serious possibility. When they were proven spectacularly wrong in 2016, the same people tried to protect their egos with a conspiracy theory about “collusion” with Russia.

The 2020 election cycle started off with liberals wallowing in the same dismissive and unfounded certainty of their own triumph. Trump had no chance at reelection, they assumed, if he even made it to Election Day without being removed from office. Now following his acquittal and the realization that Democrats have to face the man who humiliated them, wishful thinking among liberals is quickly changing into outright panic.

Rising approval ratings, widespread agreement among Americans that they are better off under Trump, and the utter absence of the recession that his detractors have been predicting for years are breaking through the bubble of confidence that the liberal commentators had created for themselves and their fawning audiences. The race for the Democratic nomination is devolving into a blame game as the party scrambles to identify which of the candidates will not be a sure loser in November.

The collapse of Joe Biden has made Bernie Sanders the new front runner, which has many liberals sweating bullets. The Democratic establishment is scrambling to find someone other than Sanders, as moderates such as Jonathan Chait sound the alarm. But leave it to James Carville, the spin doctor for Bill Clinton, to take the gloves off. “Good God! We have got to do something here,” Carville exclaimed, heavily implying that a Sanders nomination would be “the end of days” for the party and end in defeat.
 
Last edited:

Trump Gurl

Credo in Unum Deum
When CNN says it, that's not good for the Democrats:

Sanders could not beat Trump simply by mobilizing turnout. Here's why.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/26/politics/bernie-sanders-turnout-trump-2020/index.html

(James) Carville has emerged as a leader among Democrats concerned that nominating Sanders will doom the party to defeat against Trump and put the House majority at grave risk as well. Unlike Carville, Sean McElwee, founder of the liberal-leaning group Data for Progress, believes Sanders can find a pathway to victory against Trump by attracting working-class voters across racial lines. But McElwee agrees with Carville that no candidate, Sanders included, can bet on winning mostly by transforming the nature of who votes.

"I think that all campaigns are incentivized to portray themselves as doing something unique and groundbreaking and really changing the structure of turnout." McElwee says. "But turnout is a pretty durable attribute and it tends to correlate with intrinsic human identities: Older people tend to vote at much higher rates than younger; college educated vote more than non-; homeowners vote more than renters. It is really, really hard using the tools available to campaigns to change that."

This dispute has profound implications as Democrats' assess Sanders' potential viability as a general election candidate. The Democratic front-runner brushes off concerns about whether his agenda will alienate swing voters by insisting he can compensate by bringing in millions of new voters to overwhelm them.

But the evidence strongly suggests that's wrong, and that to win Sanders would, in fact, need to persuade swing voters, just like any other potential nominee. Democratic experts both sympathetic to Sanders and skeptical of him agree the real question is whether he can do that -- not whether he can count on a massive cavalry of new voters to til
t the election.
 

Trump Gurl

Credo in Unum Deum

One year inside Trump's monumental Facebook campaign
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/28/donald-trump-facebook-ad-campaign-2020-election

As the Democratic candidates for president spent 2019 battling each other in early voting states, Donald Trump’s re-election campaign built a sophisticated social media machine to communicate with conservative voters, grow its email list and fine-tune its messaging.

Over the course of 2019, the Trump campaign spent nearly $20m on more than 218,000 different Facebook ads, a new Guardian analysis shows. Among the ads were some of the images and videos that made front-page news for their xenophobic, fear-mongering, vitriolic and outright false rhetoric.

But the campaign also ran a decidedly mundane social media campaign featuring classic marketing ploys designed to harvest user data. Considering the fact that the campaign has run these ads – which are largely substance-free and appear designed to maximize engagement with simple requests – over and over again, they were probably very effective.

Trump’s prowess on Facebook has struck fear in the hearts of Democrats. The architect of his 2016 digital campaign, Brad Parscale, boasted of the sophistication of his Facebook operation, and was promoted to campaign manager for 2020. “The campaign is all about data collection,” Parscale told the Guardian. “If we touch you digitally, we want to know who you are and how you think and get you into our databases so that we can model off it and relearn and understand what’s happening.”

In order to understand how Trump is communicating with Americans on Facebook in the 2020 election cycle, the Guardian built a database of all 218,100 campaign ads launched by the Trump campaign in 2019, using the Facebook political ad archive application programming interface, or API. The analysis is the most comprehensive of the Trump re-election campaign’s Facebook advertising to date.
 

jgarden

BANNED
Banned
Trump will be reelected

Trump has never had to contend with a major crisis - if he bungles the government's response to the spread of "coronavirus" he couldn't be re-elected as dog-catcher!

Now a "whistleblower has revealed that the NHS employes sent to get Americans out of Wuhan, lacked the necessary training and proper medical suits to protect them!

While those Americans flown back from China were placed in quarantine, the NHS workers who were exposed to them were then allowed to fly back on domestic flights and return to their families - creating the spectrum of the further spreading of this virus to planeloads of passengers entering the US without taking any precautions!
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
I don't fawn. I told you that before. You seem to have a problem insulting people. Insulting people seems to be your default position.

Sure, your username and thread count regarding the guy in the WH just smacks of neutrality...

Oh, and I must be imagining that you call people tools and morons as well.

:rolleyes:
 
Top