I didn't even make this thread.
Trump supporters subjected to "extreme vetting"....and fail
- Thread starter Jose Fly
- Start date
Politics have always been a dirty business, however, Trump has opened the door to an all new level of low. This is a candidate who puts a *doctor* up to making judgments on the health of someone he has never seen, hints that the "second amendment people" should take matters into their own hands should Clinton be elected, urges the Russians to hack the Democratic party, etc.
As Trump stated, it's not a big deal because even if he loses, he goes back to a pretty nice life. That leaves the Republican party trying to clean up his mess.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Been here 3 years, ain't happened yet. Sorry if that disappoints you.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well it makes a bloody change then doesn't it? Most threads with 'Trump' in em' are "authored" by you after all...
Well bloody whatever, bloody Limey.
What you you Limeys say? "Sod off"? There ya' go.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
You may have been here three years but at least in your formative period you weren't spamming up the politics forum with your sickening Trump veneration threads...
Besides which, you spent a load of those three years being banned didn't you?
Well, there was no presidential election happening, and I hadn't realized there were so many political idiots like you here before. There you bloody well go, Limey.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Oh indubitably sirrah. One also eats tuna & cucumber sandwiches before playing a game of croquet on the lawn don't you know?
There are indeed certain residents of the British Isles that use your latter although in general the profanity tends to be rather more...fruity...
:e4e:
Now you are being pig-headed and confrontational.
Peace be with you
And to think it is all comic relief. He will do great in his chosen field. Lots of laughs on this one!
LOL. I suggest you read some history on American politics. ALL of this stuff is lightweight compared to the 1700's and 1800's. You just think its bad because you people have been so wuss-ified.
Jesus loves you.
You are right about one thing, this, "Randolph once fought a duel with Henry Clay, but otherwise mostly kept his bellicosity for the floor of Congress. He routinely dressed in a flashy manner, often accompanied by his slaves and his hunting dogs. "[W]hen Clay had set about making the speakership a position of true power upon his first election to that post in 1811, he had unceremoniously ordered Randolph to remove his dog from the House floor—something no previous Speaker had dared to do."
Randolph had an intense dislike for Rep. Willis Alston and had a pitched fight with him in a Washington boarding house. Heated words led to the two throwing tableware at each other. Six years later, they fought again in a stairwell at the House after Alston loudly referred to Randolph as a "puppy". Randolph beat Alston bloody with his cane and the two had to be separated by other congressmen. Randolph was fined $20 for this breach of the peace.?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Randolph_of_Roanoke
Randolph had an intense dislike for Rep. Willis Alston and had a pitched fight with him in a Washington boarding house. Heated words led to the two throwing tableware at each other. Six years later, they fought again in a stairwell at the House after Alston loudly referred to Randolph as a "puppy". Randolph beat Alston bloody with his cane and the two had to be separated by other congressmen. Randolph was fined $20 for this breach of the peace.?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Randolph_of_Roanoke
Of course, Trump's attacks probably haven't hit all that close to home for you, so the fact that you aren't moved by them speaks to your callousness more than anything.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Calm down dude. You're free to be as gullible and a dupe as much as you wish. Some of us aren't so gormless as to venerate an egotistical business mogul as some sort of political philanthropist or some equivalent is all.
Then again, you may have a problem with philanthropy anyway?
:think:
Wrong. Its more like this: Weak Nancys like you perceive strong talk as being "attacks" and gut all bunched up about it.
I said: ".......ALL of this stuff is lightweight compared to the 1700's and 1800's. You just think its bad because you people have been so wuss-ified."
I am correct. Read Ktoyou's post right above yours just to give you one example.
I am right about all things young friend. God be with you.