ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
The whole driving rainee anywhere has always been his invention.
no, it's demonstrable
she deleted much of her part of your exchange, but it still exists in your responses
The whole driving rainee anywhere has always been his invention.
I haven't changed a thing about this thread or it's approach. It was as it is. The only difference is in your skin.
That's how you feel about it. It is no more true than your humanist remarks or Sods lying about, oh, nearly anything to do with me.
The whole driving rainee anywhere has always been his invention. Maybe he believes it, maybe not. Maybe he just can't understand that there's another way of thinking and being than his own way. Sociopaths don't really get how the rest of the world thinks. They only mimic it.
Gee, cholostosom, I didn't know I was.
In the bag, so to speak. lain:
It's touching that you keep a scrapbook, but that bit (not the best or worst) was in line with a larger note on Chrys venting his bowels in fake awards that mostly only found humor in the comments of others.an example of his "brilliant wit" to savor - he is responding to Chrysostom:
and referring to a colostomy bag
prolly a suggestion of bybee's, knowing her fondness for matters of a scatological nature
I was disgusted when he used it to chase rainee away
captured here: http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4431995&postcount=1955
No, that's why I posted as strong a bit in relation to IMJ literally two posts before your glowing review. You're a bit like Sod, who suddenly found a litany of complaints, from character to religion, right after I opposed him strongly over race baiting.Wrong.
I didn't close it to avoid you and I opened it later, as I always do. But the arguments and offenses were there to continue in the threads noted. I'm not going to do much more of this with you. It's just not the point of the thread. If my characterizations are off people will see it. They may follow the links and think, "He's wrong about her." Or not. I'm guessing mostly not, from the responses I get.My remarks weren't made in a thread I could close after I made them.
Then you don't understand the word. You disparaged my faith. That's lower than any treatment you've had from me. But I didn't return it. I noted my disappointment. Dazed (and confused, being the inference you missed) seemed charitable.Your calling me Daze, and saying, "Then, after responding to the humanist nonsense one too many times, I came about as close to being outraged (in this case, head shakingly disappointed) and..." then shutting down the thread was one of the most cowardly things I've seen on here.
No, I don't, you're just an essentially blinkered soul who sees me as wonderful in agreement and horrible in disagreement.And, you do argue from a humanistic point of view.
Sociopaths don't really get how the rest of the world thinks. They only mimic it.
.. you're just an essentially blinkered soul who sees wonderful in agreement and horrible in disagreement. That's your problem.
Thanks you two for making my point about the thread and what trolls do when they're given the keys to the kingdom.
.. the keys to the kingdom.
And they have turned this kingdom into a most unsavory and unpleasant place to be.
You didn't have any problem with the thread until you were a subject in a Gazette.
Let's get a different opinion from someone a little earlier in this very thread:
Like I've said before, every argument is linked to and the place to continue the disagreement is in the thread. That's why I don't raise additional arguments in this thread, only note and link to debates ongoing.
Things change, as do people. We are known by the company we keep.
Hey, troll, the kingdom is TOL. Keys to troll it. See, that's another reason I mostly don't talk to you. It's like tutoring someone who is never really going to learn to read.another revealing slip:
notice his appraisal of his own self-celebrating blog-of-a-thread
"the kingdom"
on a Christian website
seems almost blasphemous, doesn't it?
It's a metaphor, but having you critique what's acceptable to a Christian is like getting a lecture in travel etiquette from a Visigoth.not to a Christian
:think:
another revealing slip:
notice his appraisal of his own self-celebrating blog-of-a-thread
"the kingdom"
on a Christian website
seems almost blasphemous, doesn't it?
feel free to whine about it all you like :idunno:
Yes, you enjoyed my absence so much you continued to talk and talk about me after I left, then stalked me like a suitor when I returned.actually town, it felt like Christmas when you were absent
do us all a favor...