Typical, claim anything you don't agree with is a lie.
In general I agree with the truth and not with lies.
However, that has nothing to do with it.
If abortion truly was 3% of PP business I would agree that it was 3% of their business, regardless of the fact that I don't agree with the act of abortion.
But far be it from me to expect you to put two and two together.
Newsflash, Public school doesn't support children under 3 (and preschool doesn't normally last all day). The parent has to care for the child up until that point, and during the summer and after school. Try working with a small child in tow (or even attending school), it doesn't work.
- Then why would we need to pay for their early education when there's no school for them?
- My dad did exactly those things; went to school and work and took me with him.
- How does it feel to fail?
I've heard nothing but complaints for supporting children of
poor single parents. Again, you love the unborn children . . until they're born, then their parents need to get it together and support themselves. :dizzy:
I love and support my nephews who are children of an unwed couple. I've given my brother money to buy them food, and have bought them food myself. And the oldest isn't actually his, biologically speaking; I love him just the same anyway.
But you know what, my brother and his now ex-girlfriend do need to get it together and work on supporting those three kids. They need to stop doing drugs and worry about spending money on those children. And my brother should have been thinking about his children and the money he could have been making to support them and the money he would have gotten in his tax return if he had actually worked during the ten months he didn't have a job last year. Now he's without a car and won't get enough back to get one, a car he needs to keep going to the job he has now so he can continue to support his children.
And he lost his previous job when he failed a drug test.
So, let's compare my dad and my brother [same mother, different father]: one was a poor single parent, the other currently is. The former didn't do drugs and didn't rely on government assistance. The latter does drugs and is worried that he won't receive enough money from the government's policy of giving people with kids more money in their tax returns. The former made sure his son had a roof over his head, food in his belly when needed, clean clothes [and new ones when necessary], a haircut once or twice a month and even a private school education from preschool through second grade, among many other things. The latter relies on his grandfather to help him with some of these and let's the mother take care of much of the rest [and I don't even know how much she does] and the oldest, being the only one old enough for school, goes to public school.
And you know when my dad could no longer afford to do these things? When my mom went on welfare and the government started garnishing his wages for child support. Before that my mom never asked for him to pay it, because he paid for the things I needed of his own accord.
Now, which one of these two men deserves more respect?