:AMR:
Okay, wait...I don't know what to disagree with first.
How "inconvenient" is it really to have to ask a pharmacist to hand you a package of medication?
Does that inconvenience actually stop the making of meth? I doubt it.
I even disagree that this 'inconvenience' doesn't stop meth production. I think it does make it more inconvenient for meth producers and dealers. I'm sure it has even stopped some. Just not much and certainly not enough to even pretend to
reduce meth production in light of its increased popularity over the years. What I think is that it simply isn't effective overall and not nearly as effective as swift, public executions.
One thing it does do is raise awareness in a humane way.
Why is this important enough to warrant the hassle?
If you were to execute every meth cooker I doubt that would do much for humanity. They would continue to cook it...
Do you mean that it wouldn't stop
all meth production? Because, if so...of course and so what? If we could arrange for people to automatically burst into flames and explode when they attempt to make meth I'm sure someone somewhere would still try to make it. And among them some would surely succeed in making some before they explode. No law, no matter how harsh, will ever
completely eliminate crime. And so...what? Why not make this argument for all laws that fail to completely eradicate the crimes they address. Because, you know, that'd be all of them.
Or do you mean putting people to death, publicly, for making or selling meth wouldn't even
reduce meth production? Because I honestly can't believe you mean that either. That's ludicrous. You can argue it wouldn't reduce it enough to warrant the death penalty and certainly not a public death penalty...but I can't believe you're arguing it'd have no or even little effect.
...and IMO the overall moral compass of humans would suffer.
How much death and suffering is one meth supplier responsible for? How much one dealer? How exactly is taking the responsibility of putting that one person to death rather than more comfortably suffering all those other deaths because they're more distantly removed going to swing the moral compass of humanity any direction but decidedly to the better?