Rusha said:I predict that we will meet the goal for the 2013 TOL-a-thon ...
How dare you derail the squabblefest! :sibbie:
But CW, you'd declared that a long time ago.
:think: Running out of descriptions? Anyway, I'm happy to be described similarly to the way you did those who died in that Colorado theater shooting shielding others.
Nearly makes my day.
I already challenged you on that one. Not one quote out of 22K. I think you had to go with reworking the English language and rules of logic to take the stab.
:e4e:
Certainly. I find the sacrifice of those who died in an attempt to shield others from harm to be an expression of love that can be matched, but not surpassed. I think that's selfless, brave and heroic.Or, you could tell the truth, and explain to everyone why your standards for heroes are almost as low as your standards for honesty. :dunce:
...the biggest misconception is that Jesus is God.
Or, you could tell the truth, and explain to everyone why your standards for heroes are almost as low as your standards for honesty. :dunce:
Well, I hadn't planned on us speaking again, but I think it's fair play to comment on you commenting on me.CW, I watched you set him up, turn his own tactics and words back on him and walk him right into a trap. It was masterfully done.
Good to know you agree with CW that every time we use a metaphor, something we know isn't literally true, we're liars. Masterful.And I watched it knowing that he'd never acknowledge it, never live up to his own definition, never have the honor to accept his own words.
Yes. I don't doubt it.I recognized it because it's a technique I've used in the past with other posters.
That's what I thought. From race baiting to this sort of nonsense. You do it because it amuses you. lain:And other than satisfying my own amusment, it hasn't made a lick of difference.
Well, I hadn't planned on us speaking again, but I think it's fair play to comment on you commenting on me.
Anyone who is so negatively invested in me that they could describe CW's fumblings as "masterful" is mostly my best revenge on themselves.
Good to know you agree with CW that every time we use a metaphor, something we know isn't literally true, we're liars. Masterful.
You've redesigned the dictionary so that the definition of a lie no longer contains the necessity of an attempt to deceive.
Magnificent. Spitacular even. oly:
Why?
You're about to add the answer.
Yes. I don't doubt it.
But why would an essentially rational being do something like that?
That's what I thought. From race baiting to this sort of nonsense. You do it because it amuses you. lain:
Chrys will create a multitude of threads about destroying the Democrat party ... and unions ...
Once again you ignore your own behavior. Using and posting untrue things to mislead other people in a very dishonest way.
Once again you declare in lieu. How about that quote you haven't found yet? (hint: it doesn't exist)Once again you ignore your own behavior. Using and posting untrue things to mislead other people in a very dishonest way.
Look, I know how much you hung on the hope that my saying I saw chrys was dragging you out of the red would be the lie you could use as a new drum to beat, but it just isn't. No one can see that sort of thing and your ignorance on the point isn't the thing that makes it an attempt to deceive you.Except that you won't acknowledge your deceptions, and simply pass them off as "fishing" or "reasoned inference", or any other label that would avoid the obvious label, honest people just call lies.
It wasn't implying. It was literally stating something that wasn't true, as is, "My, aren't you clever?" but neither are a lie.How much fishing (implying something that is not true),
You think a dictionary is too narrow and insane. Noted. lain:Your standard for lying is so narrow, as to be insane.
Thanks for underlying your want of character more particularly and for the second time.Your mother should have raised you better.
Cowardly ongoing sniping and fanning while posturing as something else previously noted, but thanks for the underscore. :thumb:He's a squalid creature. Best to avoid him.
Once again you ignore your own behavior. Using and posting untrue things to mislead other people in a very dishonest way.
Except that you won't acknowledge your deceptions, and simply pass them off as "fishing" or "reasoned inference", or any other label that would avoid the obvious label, honest people just call lies.
How much fishing (implying something that is not true), how many "reasoned inferences" to discredit someone that are just plain false, is one unemployed sleazy lawyer allowed?
Your standard for lying is so narrow, as to be insane. Your mother should have raised you better.
Rusha said:I predict that in 2013 TOL will become the forum of utopia.
No harsh words or anger, only sugary sweetness ... like the cyber version of Mister Rogers' Neighborhood Meets the Net.