Junius Gallio
New member
How so? He is either losign in the swing states by a lot or tied with polls that use a democratic lean. So how do you figure?
The same way I do--by refusing to take a conspiracist view of the polls.
How so? He is either losign in the swing states by a lot or tied with polls that use a democratic lean. So how do you figure?
How so? He is either losing in the swing states by a lot, or tied with polls that use a democratic lean. So how do you figure? I am watching al jezeera right now. They think Romney is winning, but want Obama to win (badly).
Here's a Huffington Post piece about polling data.
By way of isolating on data from one swing state, Ohio, the polling all shows Obama ahead. He only needs Ohio and a couple of others, by projection, to reach the magic number.
Then I don't think you looked at the link, since it cited to polling data not created by HP. I don't let anyone process information for me, but I don't ignore information that can be independently confirmed either. It's a good jumping off point. And it seems in line (especially the model created by Stanford' Simon Jackman) with the New York Times model.Ugh. TH, I do not trust HuffPo--they're the liberal equivalent of FoxNews, and are (imho) too biased to be trustworthy.
One of the points made in the article, if memory serves. I think a lot of people are invested in drama and that it serves everyone to keep this thing feeling like a piano wire, but I don't believe it is or will turn out that way.Yup. If Obama takes Ohio and Wisconsin (both of which appear to be solidly in the bag for him), then by CNN projections he only needs five more electoral votes. RealClearPolitics places the election solidly in his hands (on their "No toss ups" map).
Zeal brings hope and the two together, fanned by talking point friendly media outlets, can generate a great deal of smoke without much real heat.The folks talking about a "Romney landslide" are talking through their hat.
Then I don't think you looked at the link, since it cited to polling data not created by HP.
Cool beans, as the kids say...they do say that, don't they? :think:I don't distrust the citations, I distrust the interpretation and the omissions. Same as for Fox and MSNBC. Huffpo is biased--but they're not downright dishonest like WND or Newsmax.
Cool beans, as the kids say...they do say that, don't they? :think:
I asked Jack if he was interested in saying it...If the kids nowadays are saying it, then it's back. That first came around in the 60s. :chuckle:
I kind of think Obama will win. As inept as he is and the fact that Romney isn't leading by a landslide is perplexing to me. I guess people love a liar and don't care what Obama says and does.
Somebody should have told Gore he was a democrat.Uh... it's typically the Democrats who fight over the results.
In those states I think it might be easier to vote third party.I don't know, but I'm glad I live in a swing-state (Pennsylvania) where my vote will matter.
I don't know how people in states like NY, California, Texas, Illinois, etc get excited to vote, when it is crystal clear who will get their state's electoral votes before they even vote.
The TheologyOnline.com TOPIC OF THE DAY for November 5th, 2012 09:47 AM
toldailytopic: The election is finally upon us. What do you think will be the outcome?
Take the topic above and run with it! Slice it, dice it, give us your general thoughts about it. Everyday there will be a new TOL Topic of the Day.
If you want to make suggestions for the Topic of the Day send a Tweet to @toldailytopic or @theologyonline or send it to us via Facebook.
In those states I think it might be easier to vote third party.
will let you know next week.....
I think after all the votes are counted the queen will still be the queen.