IMJerusha
New member
We must accept that, Scripture can be, and is, misinterpreted at times, in
order to make a false doctrine sound true!
Well now, on that we can agree! When Yeshua states something outright, however, you can take that to the bank!
We must accept that, Scripture can be, and is, misinterpreted at times, in
order to make a false doctrine sound true!
Grosnick, you can't have it both ways.
I wasn't speaking of conformations.
Grosnick, you can't have it both ways.
Well now, on that we can agree! When Yeshua states something outright, however, you can take that to the bank!
I actually agree with GM on this one. I believe in OSAS, but I believe that Heaven is not a prison. If, upon arrival, the presence of God is not something you can tolerate, I figure you would have the freedom to go elsewhere and be miserable.I believe in OSAS and I believe we have freewill! How is that,
having it both ways?
I actually agree with GM on this one. I believe in OSAS, but I believe that Heaven is not a prison. If, upon arrival, the presence of God is not something you can tolerate, I figure you would have the freedom to go elsewhere and be miserable.
Most do not say an act of sin causes loss of salvation.
Heb. 12 and I Jn. and Pauline writings contradict you (you dispensationalize away the former and are selective with the latter).
God is holy, not a deaf, dumb, blind idol with amnesia.
etc. blah blah; Jesus sees me as sinless even though I am fornicating, etc. blah blah)
It is NOT legal nor moral for a Christian. It is a sin, contrary to the will and Word of God. You are justifying all sin due to your wrong view of sanctification, justification, etc
If you think that we are justified positionally while our life is godless, demonic, and no different than that of evil unbelievers, you are fooling yourself.
So Paul encouraged violation of the Decalogue? No! He reinforced every command except the Sabbath.
I hold that loving obedience to the law AFTER salvation by grace through faith is consistent with how Jesus and Paul lived. The law condemns us as sinners. It does not save us. We cannot keep the law (God's standard is perfection in thought, word, motive, deed) in order to be saved.
You are slandering me.
Romans 4:7 is talking about initial justification, not subsequent lapses. Our past sins are not counted against us. This does not mean that God is blind to our future sins and winks at them as we fall into them again. It should not be extrapolated as unconditional forgiveness while persisting in sin in the future.
That is true of both churches. The difference is the ministry. There are Jews and Gentiles in the Body of Christ. There are Jews and Gentiles in the gospel of circumcision."There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." Galatians 3:28
I believe in OSAS and I believe we have freewill! How is that,
having it both ways?
I actually agree with GM on this one. I believe in OSAS, but I believe that Heaven is not a prison. If, upon arrival, the presence of God is not something you can tolerate, I figure you would have the freedom to go elsewhere and be miserable.
Why do you claim I keep sinning?
Do you know me?
Do you know anything?
Have you even thought about the idea that, Christ
was telling that person, not to continue, in THAT
particular sin? Just a warning from Christ to stop
committing that, personally chosen sin?
Yep. And after much chastening, that particular act will no longer be a problem, but, rest assured, another area will be brought into the light.
Because she is carnal minded. She sees the flesh and makes judgement by it.
Saying that one can lose their salvation is like saying Christ can be un-crucified.
You really should have gone through the entire letter because you must have missed in Chapters 12 and 13 where the writer, presumably Paul, identifies the recipients as fellow believers. I'm amazed, with your level of “discernment”, that you missed that. "Let us fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy set before him endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God." And he goes on to encourage them to endure their opposition for "we are receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken, let us be thankful, and so worship God acceptably with reverence and awe, for our 'God is a consuming fire.' " It is a letter of exhortation, love and encouragement to fellow believers. "May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, equip you with everything good for doing his will and may he work in us what is pleasing to him, through Jesus Christ, to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen." And so, not only do myriad Bible commentaries identify the recipients of this letter as Hebrew Christians but also the letter itself accomplishes this.
You are wasting your breath. We have been going round and round with him and losing salvation. Including Judas with what you are pointing out. It goes even further. Judas was chosen because he was a devil. Rulz doesn't care, he wants to pull people from the faith.
That would be an OSAS doctrinal addendum. The two always seem to run hand in hand. God foreknew our choices. He didn't make them for us. He gave us free will to choose Him or walk away.
God chose a devil for the inner circle of Christ and called him an apostle?! What Bible are you reading? A Calvinistic one or the Satanic Bible?