IMJerusha
New member
Not what I meant at all. You missed my point.
Please be so kind to expound.
Not what I meant at all. You missed my point.
Please be so kind to expound.
Just go back and re-read my posts. Thanks.
:sigh: For a moment there, I thought I spied detente.
I've read your posts.
Well, then, again: you missed my point. I'll say it again: to dwell, consistently, and repeatedly, on behavior that one claims to find disgusting, or sinful, speaks to an unhealthy and repressed mind. Many Christians here (OEJ's original post that prompted my comment is a case in point) seem to enjoy wallowing in downright pornographic scenarios that they excuse as "worst case" or "calls for alarm," which seems disingenuous to me. I see this all the time, on TOL and elsewhere: moral alarmists who seem awfully eager to describe, in prurient detail, behavior and activities they claim to despise. I guess it's not smut if you claim to be doing this "for the children" or in the name of "morality."
Actually, I don't believe I missed any of your points and I addressed each one of your posts as you made them. The problem, Granite, is not that you won't see our POV but rather that you can not see it because you can't see your baseline...God.
Because of that, you are really not in a position to assess our actions or motives.
You're not thinking on the same plane as we are. Not to say that you're below us or that we are above you. We're just coming from different places.
Passive aggressive arrogance is still arrogance.
Right, right. I am not worthy.
I invite you to take your presumption and find a good place to stick it.
You confuse arrogance with fruit of the Spirit.
Those are your words, not mine. I would never say that you are unworthy. You're every bit as worthy as I am in my estimation but more importantly, in God's.
LOL I would if I'd made one, but I didn't.
You confuse arrogance with faux humility. And I'm sick to death of that particular shtick. If there's "fruit" to be had here it's rotten to the core.
If you think it's impossible for me to discern what you're thinking or feeling, do me a real favor and don't respond to my posts.
I didn't have arrogance in mind at all so I really couldn't confuse it with anything.
Me thinks you protest too much. If you weren't attracted by what is here, you wouldn't be here.
I'm not here because of you, brainless.
Would you want to see you daughter doing it? Or your wife?I have to disagree. If prostitutes willingly join the profession--at a brothel in Nevada, as a call girl--and are free to leave the profession at any point, it's hard for me to see how they're being exploited.
I have to disagree. If prostitutes willingly join the profession--at a brothel in Nevada, as a call girl--and are free to leave the profession at any point, it's hard for me to see how they're being exploited.
Would you want to see you daughter doing it? Or your wife?
That doesn't address what I said.
If a woman willingly joins the profession and can leave at any point explain how she is being "exploited."
If a child willingly enters into a sexual relationship with an adult and can leave at any point, explain how they are molested?
A child is not capable of that kind of consent. We know that.
It is too heinous to contemplate this type of abuse.
Our job as individuals and as a society is to protect the innocent, the vulnerable and the handicapped.
A child is not capable of that kind of consent.
I realize that this is a sticking point for many in this type of discussion.
Can you explain what you mean by "that kind" of consent?
What "kind" is it that the government has claimed responsibility for over parental control?