oatmeal
Well-known member
He is greater at the level of person not nature.
God is greater than all.
Take it or leave it.
He is greater at the level of person not nature.
Yes.
John 8:24 24 Therefore I said to you that you will die in your sins; for if you do not believe that I am He, you will die in your sins.”
There is no He in the greek in this verse, it literally says If you do not believe that I AM, you will die in your sins.
I AM is the name for God given to moses when moses asked God who to tell the hebrew people, sent him to them.
Exodus 3:14 4 God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM.This is what you are to say to the Israelites: ‘I AM has sent me to you.’”
Later in John 8:58 Christ says this:
58 Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.”
Jesus directly called Himself the same I AM speaking to moses.
So yes, according to Christ Himself, you must believe that He is God, or you will die in your sins.
That's like saying, that since the atonement was accomplished 2000 years ago, no one was saved before it happened. The Creed solidified what was being taught for centuries.
They are all divine, and so are we. To be divine, is to be one with God. No separate-appearing individual is God. And yet, our deepest identity is God, and we and "The Father" are one. They stoned Jesus for saying that, and he replied, in effect, so are you, so why do you stone me? That is the only way to read that verse that makes any sense.
And I salute you for talking some sense to the trinitarians.
I am,
are you?
God can't be defined or described. Experience God for yourself.
What? One trick doesn't work so you go to #2 of your repetiore?Considering all the pagan cultures with triune gods, haven't you ever considered the possibility that you have been worshiping a pagan god?
No, you just swallow that pagan stuff, hook, line and sinker.
oatmeal
Oh?????
What is "man?"
that's easy for you to say.
Show me what you mean from the scriptures.
oatmeal
God is greater than all.
Take it or leave it.
Well then, you should be able to show me where someone taught it between 100 and 150 AD (prior to Justin Martyr).
Problem is, there wasn't anyone teaching trinitarianism prior to Justin Martyr, and even he wasn't exactly trinitarian.
That does not mean that his nature is greater than all. His personhood is greater than all but not nature. The nature is the same in character with the Son and Spirit, 1 John 5:20, Acts 5:4. You don't understand the difference between person and nature and that is why you are currently a damned heretic.
Indeed God is not known or knowable to humans in His potential state (i.e. as Love). God is know only in His dynamic or doing state (i.e. as urgings of Love).
Hi Drake, what nature did the first Adam have BEFORE he rebelled against God? Was that nature also equal with God?
Your opinion is noted.
But where is your scriptural references to substantiate such a claim?
Book of Totton?
oatmeal
Or, one can just go with what the Bible states instead of hanging on a pagan ideology.
See, the problem is not if it is wrong or not- it is wrong. I have proven it wrong both to myself and any listener who is actually man enough to admit it. Which isn't many, because trinitarians are dishonest. It takes that degree of dishonesty and denial to keep it alive. If everyone was honest, it would be a dead doctrine.
But because trinitarianism is so gigantic, one can feel snug inside of of that lie. They don't have to feel like blasphemers and idolaters because they have a billion other people to tell them a LIE that they are not.
That's perhaps why trinitarians so often resemble pagans right at face value. They know it is lacking deep down, so they compensate for it by acting high and mighty, being an embarrassment to both real Christians and to all of humankind in general. Fanaticism does not equal Godly, it equals medicine and asylum.
And this is precisely why idols are bad. The Bible speaks on this. What good has the trinity done? It has done absolutely nothing then divide Christendom and cause persecution. Meaningless knowledge that does no good.
That is why I am being quite literal when I say that it is an unholy doctrine. It is obvious.
You don't find it disturbing that the majority of the early church held to a form of Sabellianism (according to Turtullian), and that the Trinity doctrine you hold to explicitly and implicitly claims God has three minds, two natures, and that the Father and Holy Spirit were not in Christ on the cross?
From my perspective, it's obviously true that Jesus is God, yet the Trinity doctrine is obviously false. The only reasons people hold to the Trinity is because they think it's synonymous with affirming Christ's deity and don't really understand, or care, that the Trinity doctrine is a superfluous and heretical teaching.